Concientización facilitadoraalternativa al concepto tradicional de la motivación en el campo de la salud

  1. Fernández Arrojo, José 1
  2. Casado Verdejo, Inés 2
  1. 1 Centro de Salud Puerta de la Villa, Gijón, Asturias, España
  2. 2 Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León, España
Revista:
Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

ISSN: 1132-1296

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 29

Número: 3

Páginas: 132-136

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

Resumen

Durante las últimas décadas, el mundo se ha expuesto a una serie de amenazas por brotes virales emergentes de diferente índole. Ante la nueva pandemia del COVID-19 las actitudes, las creencias, las expectativas, o la representación que se haga del problema de salud/enfermedad, cumplen un papel determinante. Alfabetizar en salud es concientizar, aprender a reflexionar, mostrar a los pacientes la vivencia problemática, conseguir inculcar una conciencia crítica para hacerles capaz de percibir lo malo, y de descubrir los medios a emplear para su mejora. Aplicando el proceso de concientización de Paulo Freire, es posible el paso de una conciencia pasiva a una conciencia crítica activa (concientización), mediante un método activo de alfabetización y concientización en salud, de diálogo y de crítica, con propuestas y contenidos apropiados para cada caso.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bibliografía 1. World Health Organization: WHO. Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations. 2005. Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(20 05)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) [acceso: 11/04/ 2020].
  • Edwards W. The theory of decisión making. Psychological Bulletin 1954; 51:380-417.
  • Fishbein M, Azjen L. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and rese-arch. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975.
  • Azjen L, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical rese-arch. Psychological Bulletin 1977; 84:888-918.
  • Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs 1966; 2:354-386.
  • Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological proces-ses in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. En: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, authors. Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford press, 1983; cap. 6:153-176.
  • DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenan-ce. Addiction 1982; 7:133-142.
  • Sutton S. Stage theories oh health behavior. En: Corner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting heatlh behaviour: Research and practice with social cogni-tions models. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2005 (2nd ed.).
  • Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Bridle C, Sowden A, Mather L, et al. Systematic review of the effective-ness of stage based interventions to promote smo-king cessation. British Medical Journal 2003 May; 326(7400):1175.
  • Wilson GT, Schlam TR. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treat-ment of eating and weight disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 24(3):361-378.
  • Bridle C, Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Mather L, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology & Health 2005; 20(3):283-301.
  • West R. Time for a change: Putting the transt-heoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addic-tion 2005; 100(8):1036-1039.
  • Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and ilness. En: Cameron LD, Levental H, edits. The self-regulation of health and illness behavior. Lon-don: Routledge: 2003; Pp. 42-65.
  • Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz DR. The com-mon sense representation of illness danger. Contri-butions to Medical Psychology 1980; 2: 7-30.
  • Cameron LD, Leventhal H. Self-regulation, health and illness: an overview. En: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour. London: Psychology Press, 2003; Pp: 1-13.
  • Gil Roales-Nieto J. Psicología de la Salud. Aproximación histórica, conceptual y aplicaciones. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide, 2004.
  • Green LW, Kreuter MV. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental appro-ach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1991.
  • Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational intervie-wing: Preparing people to change addictive be-havior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
  • Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychot-herapy 1995; 23(4):325-334.
  • Wilson GT, Schlam TR. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treat-ment of eating and weight disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 24(3):361-378.
  • Miller WR. Motivational interviewing: research, practice and puzzles. Addictive Behaviors 1996; 21(6):835-842.
  • Levensky ER. Motivational interviewing. Cognitive behavior therapy 2003; p. 252-260.
  • Allsop S. What is this thing called motivational interviewing? Addiction 2007; 102(3):343-345.
  • Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:843-61.
  • Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychol 1986; 41:159-64.
  • Shadish WR, Matt GE, Navarro AM, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2000; 126:512-29.
  • Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55:305-12.
  • Miller W, Sovereign R, Krege B. Motivational Interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drin-ker’s Check-up as preventive intervention. Behavio-ral Psychotherapy 1988; 16:251-68.
  • Miller WR, Benefield RG, Tonigan JS. En-hancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993; 61:455-61.
  • Project Match Research Group. Project MATCH: rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treat-ment. Alcohol 1993; 17:1130-45.
  • Vasilaki EI, Hosier SG, Cox WM. The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief interven-tion for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic re-view. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41:328-35.
  • Grenard JL, Ames SL, Pentz MA, Sussman S. Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults for drug-related problems. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006; 18:53-67.
  • Soria R, Legido A, Escolano C, López Yeste A, Montoya J. A randomised controlled trial of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:768-74.
  • Knight KM, McGowan L, Dickens C, Bundy C. A systematic review of motivational interviewing in physical health care settings. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11:319-32.
  • Freire, Paulo. Pedagogía del oprimido. Montevi-deo: Siglo XXI Editores, 1985.
  • Freire, Paulo. Educación para el cambio social. Buenos Aires: Tierra Nueva, 1974.
  • Scorsolini-Comin, Fabio. Implicaciones pedagó-gicas del concepto de aprendizaje en la asistencia en Enfermería. Index de Enfermería 2019; 28(1-2):79-83.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet