Concientización facilitadoraalternativa al concepto tradicional de la motivación en el campo de la salud

  1. Fernández Arrojo, José 1
  2. Casado Verdejo, Inés 2
  1. 1 Centro de Salud Puerta de la Villa, Gijón, Asturias, España
  2. 2 Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León, España
Journal:
Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

ISSN: 1132-1296

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 29

Issue: 3

Pages: 132-136

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the world has been exposed to a number of threats from emerging viral outbreaks of different kinds. In the face of the new COVID-19 pandemic, attitudes, beliefs, expectations, or representations of the disease/health problem, play a determining role. Alphabetize in health is to raise consciousness, to learn to think, to show patients their problematic experience, to inculcate a critical conscience to make them capable of perceiving what is bad, and to discover the means to be used for its improvement. Applying Paulo Freire's process of conscientization, it is possible to pass from a passive conscience to an active critical conscience (conscientization), through an active method of alphabetization and conscientization in health, dialogue and critique, with appropriate proposals and contents for each case.

Bibliographic References

  • Bibliografía 1. World Health Organization: WHO. Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations. 2005. Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(20 05)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) [acceso: 11/04/ 2020].
  • Edwards W. The theory of decisión making. Psychological Bulletin 1954; 51:380-417.
  • Fishbein M, Azjen L. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and rese-arch. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975.
  • Azjen L, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical rese-arch. Psychological Bulletin 1977; 84:888-918.
  • Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs 1966; 2:354-386.
  • Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological proces-ses in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. En: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, authors. Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford press, 1983; cap. 6:153-176.
  • DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenan-ce. Addiction 1982; 7:133-142.
  • Sutton S. Stage theories oh health behavior. En: Corner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting heatlh behaviour: Research and practice with social cogni-tions models. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2005 (2nd ed.).
  • Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Bridle C, Sowden A, Mather L, et al. Systematic review of the effective-ness of stage based interventions to promote smo-king cessation. British Medical Journal 2003 May; 326(7400):1175.
  • Wilson GT, Schlam TR. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treat-ment of eating and weight disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 24(3):361-378.
  • Bridle C, Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Mather L, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology & Health 2005; 20(3):283-301.
  • West R. Time for a change: Putting the transt-heoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addic-tion 2005; 100(8):1036-1039.
  • Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and ilness. En: Cameron LD, Levental H, edits. The self-regulation of health and illness behavior. Lon-don: Routledge: 2003; Pp. 42-65.
  • Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz DR. The com-mon sense representation of illness danger. Contri-butions to Medical Psychology 1980; 2: 7-30.
  • Cameron LD, Leventhal H. Self-regulation, health and illness: an overview. En: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The Self-Regulation of Health and Illness Behaviour. London: Psychology Press, 2003; Pp: 1-13.
  • Gil Roales-Nieto J. Psicología de la Salud. Aproximación histórica, conceptual y aplicaciones. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide, 2004.
  • Green LW, Kreuter MV. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental appro-ach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1991.
  • Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational intervie-wing: Preparing people to change addictive be-havior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
  • Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychot-herapy 1995; 23(4):325-334.
  • Wilson GT, Schlam TR. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treat-ment of eating and weight disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 24(3):361-378.
  • Miller WR. Motivational interviewing: research, practice and puzzles. Addictive Behaviors 1996; 21(6):835-842.
  • Levensky ER. Motivational interviewing. Cognitive behavior therapy 2003; p. 252-260.
  • Allsop S. What is this thing called motivational interviewing? Addiction 2007; 102(3):343-345.
  • Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:843-61.
  • Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychol 1986; 41:159-64.
  • Shadish WR, Matt GE, Navarro AM, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2000; 126:512-29.
  • Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55:305-12.
  • Miller W, Sovereign R, Krege B. Motivational Interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drin-ker’s Check-up as preventive intervention. Behavio-ral Psychotherapy 1988; 16:251-68.
  • Miller WR, Benefield RG, Tonigan JS. En-hancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993; 61:455-61.
  • Project Match Research Group. Project MATCH: rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treat-ment. Alcohol 1993; 17:1130-45.
  • Vasilaki EI, Hosier SG, Cox WM. The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief interven-tion for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic re-view. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41:328-35.
  • Grenard JL, Ames SL, Pentz MA, Sussman S. Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults for drug-related problems. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006; 18:53-67.
  • Soria R, Legido A, Escolano C, López Yeste A, Montoya J. A randomised controlled trial of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:768-74.
  • Knight KM, McGowan L, Dickens C, Bundy C. A systematic review of motivational interviewing in physical health care settings. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11:319-32.
  • Freire, Paulo. Pedagogía del oprimido. Montevi-deo: Siglo XXI Editores, 1985.
  • Freire, Paulo. Educación para el cambio social. Buenos Aires: Tierra Nueva, 1974.
  • Scorsolini-Comin, Fabio. Implicaciones pedagó-gicas del concepto de aprendizaje en la asistencia en Enfermería. Index de Enfermería 2019; 28(1-2):79-83.
Data source: Dialnet