Nuevos entornos de aprendizaje para la escrituraSistemas de tutoría inteligente

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aleven, V., Ashley, K., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (junio, 2008). Intelligent tutoring systems for ill-defined domains: Assessment and feedback in ill-defined domains. Trabajo presentado en el 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bc92/f01e2282eacc6bf714db10958f7 0401f6d29.pdf
• Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (junio, 2015). Promoting selfregulated learning in an intelligent tutoring system for Writing. Trabajo presentado en International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Madrid, España. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bdaf/a2e6e9f6654e0d7f 1751f60395b549ad1758.pdf
• Allen, L., Matthew, E.J., & McNamara, D.S. (2017). Computerbased writing instruction. In C.A. Macarthur, S Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 316228). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition–Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367– 379.doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
• Azevedo, R., Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Harley, J. M., & Trevors, G. J. (2012). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in student-centered learning environments. In Land, S., & Jonassen, D (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of student-center learning environments (pp. 216–260). New York, NY: Routledge
• Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research y Practice, 17(1), 65-77.doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00032
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 69-93. doi: 10.2307/1170560
• Barrera III, M. T., Rule, A. C., & Diemart, A. (2001). The effect of writing with computers versus handwriting on the writing achievement of first-graders. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2001(1), 215-229.
• Carbonell, J. R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-machine Systems, 11(4), 190-202. doi: 10.1109/TMMS.1970.299942
• Cataldi, Z., & Lage, F. J. (2009). Sistemas tutores inteligentes orientados a la enseñanza para la comprensión. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 28. doi: 10.21556/edutec.2009.28.456
• Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Educat ion, 105, 14-30. doi : 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
• Crinon, J., & Legros, D. (2002). The semantic effects of consulting a textual database on rewriting. Learning and Inst ruc t ion, 12(6) , 605-626. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00031-7
• De Smet, M. J., Brand-Gruwel, S., Broekkamp, H., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Write between the lines: Electronic outlining and the organization of text ideas. Computers in Human Behavior , 28 (6 ) , 2107-2116. doi : 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.015
• De Smet, M. J., Brand-Gruwel, S., Leijten, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). Electronic outlining as a writing strategy: Effects on students’ writing products, mental effort and writing process. Computers & Education, 78, 352-366. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.010
• Englert, C. S., Wu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Cognitive tools for writing: Scaffolding the performance of students through technology. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 184-198. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00132.x
• Ferreira, A., & Atkinson, J. (2009). Designing a feedback component of an intelligent tutoring system for foreign language. Knowledge-Based Systems 22(7), 496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2008.10.012
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31(1), 21-32.
• Fournier-Viger P., Nkambou R., Nguifo E.M. (2010) Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains. In: Nkambou R., Bourdeau J., Mizoguchi R. (Eds.), Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Studies in computational intelligence (pp.81-101). Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg
• Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., & Dooley, S. (2005). Summary Street®: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 53-80. doi: 10.2190/DH8F-QJWMJ457-FQVB
• Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writ ing in tervent ions for s tudents wi th learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454-473. doi: 10.1177/0014402914527238
• Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2(1).
• Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Matthews, E., Mitchell, H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., et al. (2003). Why/AutoTutor: A test of learning gains from a physics tutor with natural language dialog. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 25(25), 1069-7977. Trabajo recuperado de https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6mj3q2v1.
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
• Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chambers, A. B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. In MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.211-226). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523-547. doi: 10.1086/681947
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of educational psychology, 104(4), 879-896. doi: 10.1037/a0029185
• Holdich, C. E., & Chung, P. W. (2003). A ‘computer tutor’to assist children develop their narrative writing skills: conferencing with HARRY. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(5), 631-669. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00086-7
• Koster, M. P., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P., & Van den Bergh, H. H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299-324.doi: 10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
• Lajoie, S., & Azevedo, R. (2006) Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments. In Patricia A. Alexander, A.P., & Winne, H. P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology Routledge (pp.803-820). New York, NY: Routledge
• Lenhard, W., Baier, H., Endlich, D., Schneider, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2013). Rethinking strategy instruction: direct reading strategy instruction versus computer-based guided practice. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 223-240. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01505.x
• Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 2344. doi: 10.1007/BF02504551
• MacArthur, C. A. (2006). The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 248–262). New York: The Guilford Press
• MacArthur, C. A. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 93-103. doi: 10.1111/j.15405826.2009.00283.x
• MacArthur, C. A., & Cavalier, A. R. (2004). Dictation and speech recognition technology as test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 43-58. doi: 10.1177/001440290407100103
• Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S., & Barrow, D. K. (2013). The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system. Computers & Education, 60(1), 264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.002
• Mónico, P., Pérez-Sotomayor, S. M., Areces, D., Rodríguez, C., & García, T. (2017). Afrontamiento de Necesidades Específicas de Apoyo Educativo (NEAE) y burnout en el profesorado. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 12(1), 35-54.
• Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 641-678. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
• Pan, A. C., & Zbikowski, J. M. (1997). Emerging technology for writing instruction: new directions for teachers. Computers in the Schools, 13(3-4), 103-118. doi: 10.1300/J025v13n03_08
• Paz, S. D. L. (2007). Managing cognitive demands for writing: Comparing the effects of instructional components in strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 249266. doi: 10.1080/10573560701277609
• Peterson-Karlan, G. R. (2011). Technology to support writing by students with learning and academic disabilities: Recent research trends and findings. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 7(1), 39-62.
• Proske, A., Narciss, S., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Computer-based scaffolding to facilitate students’ development of expertise in academic writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 136-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01450.x
• Quinlan, T. (2004). Speech recognition technology and students with writing difficulties: Improving fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 337-346. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.337
• Rijlaarsdam, G; Janssen., T; Rietdijk, S., & van Weijen, D.(2017) Reporting Design Principles for Effective Instruction of Writing: Interventions as Constructs. In Fidalgo, R., Harris, K. R., & Braaksma, M. (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 280-313). Leiden: Brill.
• Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879-906. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879
• Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Writing Pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1010-1025. doi: 10.1037/a0032340
• Rowley, K., & Meyer, N. (2003). The effect of a computer tutor for writers on student writing achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(2), 169-187. doi: 10.2190/3WVD-BKEY-PK0D-TTR7
• Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Surkes, M. A., C.Wade, A.,& Woods, J. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271-291. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002
• Schwartz, H. J., van der Geest, T., & Smit-Kreuzen, M. (1992). Computers in writing instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 37-50. doi: 10.1016/08830355(92)90040-D
• Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. C., Elliot,N., Miel,S.,& Folt, P.(2017). Automated writing evaluation. An expanding body of knowledge. In C.A. Macarthur, S Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 395-409). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Shute, V. J., Lajoie, S. P., & Gluck, K. A. (2000). Individualized and group approaches to training. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training and retraining: A handbook for business, Industry, government, and the military (pp. 171-207). New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Sung, Y. T., Liao, C. N., Chang, T. H., Chen, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (2016). The effect of online summary assessment and feedback system on the summary writing on 6th graders: The LSA-based technique. Computers & Education, 95, 118. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.003
• VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
• Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language teaching research, 10(2), 157-180.doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa
• Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2013). High-fidelity implementation of web-based intelligent tutoring system improves fourth and fifth graders content area reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 68, 366-379. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.021
• Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94-109. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004
• Zaid, M. A. (2011). Effects of web-based pre-writing activities on college EFL students’ writing performance and their writing apprehension. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 23(2), 77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jksult.2011.04.003