Dust explosion venting in silos: A comparison of standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491
- Tascón, A. 1
- Aguado, P.J. 1
- Ramírez, A. 2
-
1
Universidad de León
info
-
2
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
info
ISSN: 0950-4230
Year of publication: 2009
Volume: 22
Issue: 2
Pages: 204-209
Type: Article
More publications in: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Metrics
Cited by
JCR (Journal Impact Factor)
- Year 2009
- Journal Impact Factor: 0.81
- Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 0.619
- Article influence score: 0.245
- Best Quartile: Q3
- Area: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 68/128 (Ranking edition: SCIE)
SCImago Journal Rank
- Year 2009
- SJR Journal Impact: 0.691
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: Food Science Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 49/244
- Area: Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 68/420
- Area: Energy Engineering and Power Technology Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 31/397
- Area: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 24/293
- Area: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 48/499
- Area: Management Science and Operations Research Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 46/152
- Area: Control and Systems Engineering Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 55/657
CIRC
- Social Sciences: A
Abstract
Venting devices are commonly used to try to reduce the damage caused by any dust explosion that may occur in silo systems. In North America and Europe the sizing of these vent areas is governed by standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491, respectively, both of which have recently come into force. The aim of the present work was to compare these standards in terms of the cost of protecting against dust explosions. Vent areas calculated according to NFPA 68 were smaller than those calculated in line with EN14491, except when the silos had a length/diameter ratio of 1, when the opposite was true. The difference increases for high length/diameter ratios, especially when the reduced explosion pressure is low. The optimum design for attaining minimum protection costs according to the two standards was slightly different. As a practical example, the cost of protecting a real silo using venting panels was calculated using both standards. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.