Dust explosion venting in silos: A comparison of standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491

  1. Tascón, A. 1
  2. Aguado, P.J. 1
  3. Ramírez, A. 2
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

Revista:
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

ISSN: 0950-4230

Ano de publicación: 2009

Volume: 22

Número: 2

Páxinas: 204-209

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.JLP.2008.12.006 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-61349103642 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Indicadores

Citas recibidas

  • Citas en Scopus: 31 (25-02-2024)
  • Citas en Web of Science: 22 (29-10-2023)
  • Citas en Dimensions: 20 (06-01-2024)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Ano 2009
  • Factor de impacto da revista: 0.81
  • Factor de impacto sen autocitas: 0.619
  • Article influence score: 0.245
  • Cuartil maior: Q3
  • Área: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Cuartil: Q3 Posición na área: 68/128 (Edición: SCIE)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Ano 2009
  • Impacto SJR da revista: 0.691
  • Cuartil maior: Q1
  • Área: Food Science Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 49/244
  • Área: Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 68/420
  • Área: Energy Engineering and Power Technology Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 31/397
  • Área: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 24/293
  • Área: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 48/499
  • Área: Management Science and Operations Research Cuartil: Q2 Posición na área: 46/152
  • Área: Control and Systems Engineering Cuartil: Q2 Posición na área: 55/657

CIRC

  • Ciencias Sociais: A

Dimensions

(Datos actualizados na data de 06-01-2024)
  • Total de citas: 20
  • Citas recentes (2 anos): 3
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 3.72

Resumo

Venting devices are commonly used to try to reduce the damage caused by any dust explosion that may occur in silo systems. In North America and Europe the sizing of these vent areas is governed by standards NFPA 68 and EN 14491, respectively, both of which have recently come into force. The aim of the present work was to compare these standards in terms of the cost of protecting against dust explosions. Vent areas calculated according to NFPA 68 were smaller than those calculated in line with EN14491, except when the silos had a length/diameter ratio of 1, when the opposite was true. The difference increases for high length/diameter ratios, especially when the reduced explosion pressure is low. The optimum design for attaining minimum protection costs according to the two standards was slightly different. As a practical example, the cost of protecting a real silo using venting panels was calculated using both standards. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.