Simulations of vented dust explosions in a 5 m3 vessel
- Tascón, A. 1
- Aguado, P.J. 2
-
1
Universidad de La Rioja
info
-
2
Universidad de León
info
ISSN: 0032-5910
Year of publication: 2017
Volume: 321
Pages: 409-418
Type: Article
More publications in: Powder Technology
Metrics
Cited by
JCR (Journal Impact Factor)
- Year 2017
- Journal Impact Factor: 3.23
- Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 2.545
- Article influence score: 0.59
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 30/137 (Ranking edition: SCIE)
SCImago Journal Rank
- Year 2017
- SJR Journal Impact: 0.982
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 41/526
Scopus CiteScore
- Year 2017
- CiteScore of the Journal : 5.4
- Area: Chemical Engineering (all) Percentile: 87
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)
- Year 2017
- Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.91
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 31/154
Abstract
Vented dust explosions were simulated using the computational fluid dynamics code FLACS-DustEx. The results were compared with previously reported experimental tests performed with maize starch in a 5.2 m3 vessel with a length/diameter ratio equal to 1.05 using three different vent areas. In addition, a sensitivity study was conducted with respect to some of the parameters involved in the numerical simulations, including dust/air mixture reactivity, grid resolution and area size and activation pressure of the venting device. The simulation results were generally in good agreement with the experimental values, but the CFD code overpredicted explosion pressures for the scenario with the smallest vent area. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were dependent on both grid resolution and mixture reactivity. Further simulations confirmed the influence of the activation pressure of the venting device on the explosion overpressure when the vent area was large in comparison to the volume, i.e. with a low KV (= V2/3 / A). These simulations made it possible to study scenarios outside the range of validity of current venting standards. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.