Aplicación de la revisión de la clase 2 religión de la cdu en las bibliotecas españolas¿fin del sesgo religioso? un estudio centrado en el budismo

  1. Aragón-Palancar, Elena 1
  2. Martínez-Ávila, Daniel 2
  1. 1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)
  2. 2 Universidad de León (ULe)
Revista:
EDICIC

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Special Number: Information and knowledge as elements of empowerment of marginalized communities

Volumen: 2

Número: 4

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Resumen

The class of Religion is one of the most sensitive and historically problematic ones of the classification systems. Considering this, the present paper has two aims: to verify the process of reclassification of the already classified collection and/or application of the revision in the collection to be classified after the publication of the last revised edition of the UDC in Spanish libraries; and to examine the implications of the omission or presence of the application of this revision with respect to access, search, and retrieval of information. We studied the collection of monographs of the Spanish Bibliography and the Network of Spanish University Libraries (Rebiun), and more specifically the notation of the 080 field of the MARC record with the assignment of the call number according to the UDC and, therefore, of its physical location on the shelf. The review of the online Spanish Bibliography focuses on the monographs on religion (class 2) for the period 2007-2018 and is based on the search for bibliographic records in the online catalog of the National Library of Spain. For the study of the integrity in shelving, an advanced search was conducted for the Subject field of the Rebiun catalog, accessing the subject index and searching for a standardized term in fields 600, 610, 611, 630, 650, and 651 of the records. We analyzed the results from the online catalog of the selected library, both the bibliographic record (MARC 080 label) and the call number to obtain an insight of the location of the collection on the shelf according to the UDC. The study focused mainly on Buddhism as it was one of the numbers that structurally changed with the last revisions. The results show that it has been preferred to maintain the integrity in the location according to the call numbers following the 2001 edition, so that the bias towards the Christian religion is maintained on the shelves of the selected university collections. The scatter of religions into differentiated classes, that is, the grouping of call numbers into 29 makes the Christian religion the dominant subject. Consequently, the lack of development or the minimal expansion of non-Christian religions on the shelves implies the loss of their conceptual and structural relationships, with the consequent possibility of loss in the retrieval of documents.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aragón-Palancar, E., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2021). Ontogenia de la clase religión de la Clasificación Decimal Universal en Español. Ponto de Acesso: Revista do Instituto de Ciência da Informação da UFBA, 15(3), 21-45. https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaici/article/view/47479.
  • Baker, D., & Islam, N. (2020). From Religion Class to Religion Classification and Back Again: Religious Diversity and Library of Congress Classification. Theological librarianship, (13)1, 27-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31046/tl.v13i1.559
  • Barité Roqueta, M. G. (2011). La garantía literaria como instrumento de revisión de sistemas de organización del conocimiento: modelo y aplicación [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Granada.
  • Bibliografía Española en Línea (2022, July 14). http://www2.bne.es.
  • Biblioteca Nacional de España. Catálogo Bibliográfico. 12 de febrero de 2009. http://www.bne.es/es/Catalogos/CatalogoBibliografico/.
  • Broughton, V (2004). Essential classification. Facet Publishing.
  • Broughton, V., & Lomas E. (2020) Philosophical Foundations for the Organization of Religious Knowledge: Irreconcilable Diversity or a Unity of Purpose? Knowledge Organization, 47(5), 372-92. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-5-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-5-372
  • Catálogo Colectivo. Grupos de Trabajo REBIUN (2022, July 14). https://www.rebiun.org/grupos-trabajo/catalogo-colectivo.
  • Catálogo Colectivo. REBIUN (2022, July 14). https://rebiun.baratz.es/rebiun/.
  • Hjørland, B. (2012). Is classification necessary after Google?. Journal of Documentation, 68(3), 299-317 https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211225557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211225557
  • Mai, J.-E. (2013). Ethics, Values and Morality in Contemporary Library Classifications. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 242-253. 10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-242
  • Martínez Ávila, D., & Chaves Guimarães, J.A. (2013). Library classifications criticisms: universality, poststructuralism and ethics. Scire, 19(2), 21-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v19i2.4081
  • McIlwaine, I. C., & Mitchell, J. S. (2006). The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC/UDC view of religion. In G. Budin, C. Swertz and K. Mitgutsch (Eds.) Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the ninth international ISKO conference, Vienna, Austria (pp. 323-30). Ergon Verlag.
  • Merkley, C. (2011). The Library of Congress, Dewey Decimal, and Universal Decimal Classification Systems are Incomplete and Unsystematic. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(4), 134-136. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8QK7S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8QK7S
  • Miksa, F. L. (1998). The DDC, the universe of knowledge and the post-modern library. Forest Press.
  • San Segundo Manuel, Rosa. (2016). Clasificación Decimal Universal (CDU): Edición abreviada 2016. AENOR.
  • Oh, D.-G., & Yeo, J.-S. (2001). Suggesting an option for DDC class religion (200) for nations in which religious diversity predominates. Knowledge Organization, 28(2), 75-84.
  • Satija, M. P., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2017). Mapping of the Universe of Knowledge in Different Classification Schemes. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 7(2), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2017.7.2.085.
  • Silva, M., & Almeida, C. (2018). Representation of religions of African influence in CDD: A critical analysis of Umbanda in Brazil. Scire, 24(2), 63-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v24i2.4532
  • Smiraglia, R. P., Scharnhorst, A., Salah, A. A., & Gao, C. 2013. “UDC in action.” In A. Slavic, A. A. Slah, & S. Davies (Eds.), Classification and Visualization: Interfaces to Knowledge, Proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 24-25 October 2013, The Hague, The Netherlands (pp. 259-72). Ergon Verlag.
  • Tennis, J. (2002). Subject Ontogeny: Subject Access through Time and the Dimensionality of Classification. In M. J. López-Huertas (Ed.) Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge across Boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference 10-13 July 2002 Granada, Spain (pp. 54-59). Ergon Verlag.
  • Tennis, J. (2007). Diachronic and synchronic indexing: modeling conceptual change in indexing languages. In Information Sharing in a Fragmented World, Crossing Boundaries. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association for Information Science/L'Association canadienne des sciences de l'information. (Montreal, Quebec). http://hdl.handle.net/1773/37973.
  • Tennis, J. (2012). The Strange Case of Eugenics: A Subject’s Ontogeny in a Long-Lived Classification Scheme and the Question of Collocative Integrity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1350-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22686
  • Tennis, J. (2019). Four Orders of Classification Theory and Their Implications. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1521622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1521622
  • UDC Consortium - UDC Subject Coverage. (2021, June 15). http://www.udcc.org/index.php/site/page?view=subject_coverage.
  • Zins, C., & Santos, P. L. V. A. C. (2011). Mapping the knowledge covered by library classification systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 877-901. doi:10.1002/asi.21481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21481
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet