Discurso del odio como objeto de investigación en ciencias de la información y la documentación

  1. Aurora Cuevas-Cerveró 1
  2. Daniel Martínez-Ávila 2
  3. Mirelys Puerta-Díaz 3
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid. España
  2. 2 Universidad de León. España
  3. 3 Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Marília, Brasil
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Informatio: Instituto de Información. Facultad de Información y Comunicación

ISSN: 2301-1378

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 28

Issue: 2

Pages: 292-323

Type: Article

DOI: 10.35643/INFO.28.2.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Informatio: Instituto de Información. Facultad de Información y Comunicación

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly diverse society in which different identities and perspectives coexist, hate speech has also emerged and grew parallelly. This phenomenon, characterized by violent actions and expressions directed towards minorities, unprivileged groups as well as vulnerable collectives, is amplified by digital platforms and social media in particular. It poses significant challenges to a proper coexistence and human rights in our interconnected age. This article focuses on the study of hate speech in the field of Library and Information Science based on the research indexed by the Web of Science and the doctoral theses from the Ibero-American region for the period 2017-2022. We retrieved a total of 59 records that were analyzed using the software Pajek to visualize the network of scientific collaboration and the software VOSviewer to create networks of co-authorship and co-occurrence of topics. The results indicate an increase in publications on hate speech between 2017 and 2022, with a significant raise in 2021 and 2022. Spain, the United States, and Brazil stand out as the most productive countries on the topic, with universities such as Complutense University of Madrid in Spain and Federal University of Paraná in Brazil leading this research. The journal "Information Processing & Management" served as a fundamental medium for disseminating scientific knowledge about hate speech. The social network analysis revealed that most researchers in the field work individually, although there is a trend towards more stable co-authorship teams in recent years, suggesting room for greater scientific collaboration given the interdisciplinary nature of the topic. The keyword co-occurrence analysis reflects an interdisciplinary perspective encompassing computer science, social sciences, communication, and journalism in the study of hate speech within Library and Information Science

Bibliographic References

  • Arango, A., Pérez, J. y Poblete, B. (2019). Hate Speech Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think: A Closer Look at Model Validation. En Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'19) (pp. 45-54). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331262
  • Comisión Europea contra el Racismo y la Intolerancia (2016). Recomendación general no 15 relativa a la lucha contra el discurso de odio y memorándum explicativo. Adoptada el 8 de diciembre de 2015 [traducción no oficial]. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-n-15-on-combating-hate-speech-adopt/16808b7904
  • Consejo de Europa (1997). Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on «hate speech» adopted on 30 October. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680505d5b
  • Guterres, A. (2019) El discurso del odio, incendio arrasador. Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/sg/es/content/sg/articles/2019-06-18/the-wildfire-of-hate-speech
  • Glänzel, W. y Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. En: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W. y Schmoch, U. (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
  • Haasio, A., Mattila, M. y Ojaranta, A. (2018). The Role of Libraries in Avoiding Hate Speech and False Information. Information and Communication Sciences Research, 22(1), 9-15. Disponible en: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=762431
  • Ibarra, E. (2017). Registro, monitorización y análisis de los incidentes relativos a los discursos y delitos de odio. Cuadernos de análisis, 59, 5-8. Disponible en: http://www.estebanibarra.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/59-Monitorizacion-Delitos-de-Odio.pdf
  • MacAvaney, S., Yao, H.-R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N. y Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PloS one, 14(8), e0221152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221152
  • Mossie, Z. y Wang, J.-H. (2020). Vulnerable community identification using hate speech detection on social media.Information Processing & Management, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102087
  • Naciones Unidas (2023) ¿Qué es el discurso de odio? Disponible en: https://www.un.org/es/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech
  • Pamungkas, E. W., Basile, V. y Patti, V. (2020). Misogyny Detection in Twitter: a Multilingual and Cross-Domain Study. Information Processing & Management, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102360
  • Puerta-Díaz, M., Ovalle-Perandones, M.-A. y Martínez-Ávila, D. (2020). Patrones y tendencias emergentes de la estructura científica internacional en el dominio «discurso del odio». Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, 13(3), 963‑978. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v13.n3.2020.33017
  • Risso Ferrand, M. (2020). La libertad de expresión y el combate al discurso del odio. Estudios constitucionales, 18(1), 51-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002020000100051
  • Santos, J. C. G., Martínez-Ávila, D. y Mello, M. R. G. (2022). Agenda 2030 e direitos humanos: análise da literatura iberoamericana publicada em ciência da informação. Ibersid, 16(2), 33-43.
  • Asociación Americana de Bibliotecas (2023). American Library Association reports record number of demands to censor library books and materials in 2022. News and Press Center. Disponible en: http://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2023/03/record-book-bans-2022
  • Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. y Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1119- 1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
  • Van Eck, N. J. y Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. Univeristeit Leiden.
  • Waltman, M. S. (2018). The normalizing of hate speech and how communication educators should respond. Communication Education, 67(2), 259-265.
Data source: Dialnet