Can patriarchal attitudes moderate the relation between women on boards and firm economic performance?

  1. Paula Castro 1
  2. María T. Tascón 1
  3. Sara Corral 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 29

Número: 3

Páginas: 1-17

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumen

The paper investigates the moderating effect of patriarchal attitudes by country and year on the relationship between gender diversity on boards and firm performance. The international sample analyzed is composed of 1,103 listed firms from 18 European countries for the period of 2005–2019. Using a two-step system GMM approach, the analysis shows how the generally positive relationship between gender diversity and economic performance (proxied by return on assets and Tobin’s Q) is offset and even surpassed by the negative moderating effect of patriarchal attitudes. Furthermore, our work tests critical mass theory and finds confirmation in line with the results obtained for gender diversity. The main contributions of this work include its use of new specific proxies for gender culture by country, namely, patriarchal attitudes and the finding of how they affect the relationship between women’s board participation and firm performance in a negative and consistent way.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abad, D., Lucas-P´ erez, M. E., Mínguez-Vera, A., & Yagüe, J. (2017). Does gender diversity on corporate boards reduce information asymmetry in equity markets? Business Research Quarterly, 20(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. brq.2017.04.001
  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  • Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
  • Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1331–1355. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.1549482
  • Ahmadi, A., Nakaa, N., & Bouri, A. (2018). Chief Executive Officer attributes, board structures, gender diversity and firm performance among French CAC 40 listed firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ribaf.2017.07.083
  • Amorelli, M. F., & García-S´anchez, I. M. (2020). Critical mass of female directors, human capital, and stakeholder engagement by corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/csr.1793
  • Amorelli, M. F., & García-S´ anchez, I. M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/csr.2079
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  • Atif, M., Liu, B., & Huang, A. (2019). Does board gender diversity affect corporate cash holdings? Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 46(7-8), 1003–1029. https://doi. org/10.1111/jbfa.12397
  • Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88 (March), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
  • Botta, M. (2020). Financial crises, debt overhang, and firm growth in transition economies. Applied Economics, 52(40), 4333–4350. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00036846.2020.1734184
  • Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2020). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2089
  • Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X466594
  • Cabeza-García, L., Del Brio, E. B., & Rueda, C. (2019). Legal and cultural factors as catalysts for promoting women in the boardroom. Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.004
  • Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
  • Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. M. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.228
  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1540-6288.00034
  • Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simon, W. G (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x
  • Datta, S., Doan, T., & Toscano, F. (2021). Top executive gender, board gender diversity, and financing decisions: Evidence from debt structure choice. Journal of Banking and Finance, 125, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106070
  • Davis, L. S., & Williamson, C. R. (2019). Does individualism promote gender equality? World Development, 123, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104627
  • Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09513570210435861
  • Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta- analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0149206304272185
  • Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
  • Diehl, A. B., Stephenson, A. L., Dzubinski, L. M., & Wang, D. C. (2020). Measuring the invisible: Development and multi-industry validation of the Gender Bias Scale for Women Leaders. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(3), 249–280. https:// doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21389
  • Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28 (1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
  • Elsaid, E. (2014). Examining the effect of change in CEO gender, functional and educational background on firm performance and risk. Journal of Applied Business Research, 30(6), 1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v30i6.8878
  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2020). Statistical brief: Gender balance in largest listed companies. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/statistical-brief-gender- balance-largest-listed-companies. European Parliament (2017). Resolution of 14 March 2017 on equality between women and men in the European Union in 2014-2015 (2016/2249(INI)).
  • Galbreath, J. (2016). Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business & Society, 57(5), 863–889. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0007650316647967
  • Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8683.2010.00830.x
  • Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., & Rayton, B. (2007). Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2007.00508.x
  • Gyapong, E., & Afrifa, G. A. (2019). National culture and women managers: Evidence from microfinance institutions around the world. Business & Society, 60(6), 1387–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319876101
  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234
  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307- 0919.1014
  • Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M., & Michel, E. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 2473–2499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316628643
  • Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1263990
  • Huffman, M. L., Cohen, P. N., & Pearlman, J. (2010). Engendering change: Organizational dynamics and workplace gender desegregation 1975-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 255–277. https://doi.org/10.2189/ asqu.2010.55.2.255
  • Hurley, D., & Choudhary, A. (2020). Role of gender and corporate risk taking. Corporate Governance, 20(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2018-0313
  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., et al. (2020a). World values survey: Round five-country-pooled datafile version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp.
  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., et al. (2020b). World values survey: Round six-country-pooled datafile version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp.
  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., et al. (2020c). World values survey: Round seven-country-pooled datafile version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp.
  • Jeong, S. H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1219–1252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0716
  • Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass”? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009234
  • Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0149-2063(96)90031-8
  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9221.2004.00402.x
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990. https:// doi.org/10.1086/226425
  • Kim, B., Burns, M. L., & Prescott, J. E. (2009). The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 728–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8683.2009.00775.x
  • King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., George, J. M., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36(2), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328508
  • Kirsch, A. (2017). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. leaqua.2017.06.001
  • Konrad, A., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
  • Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., Erkut, S., & Hooper, M. J. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
  • Kristie, J. (2011). The power of three. Director Boards, 35(5), 22–32.
  • Kyaw, K., Olugbode, M., & Petracci, B. (2017). Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance? Corporate Governance, 17(5), 789–802. https://doi. org/10.1108/CG-09-2016-0183
  • Li, H., & Chen, P. (2018). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 294–308. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/beer.12188
  • Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcorpfin.2013.11.016
  • Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, R. B., Jr. (2013). Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24(3), 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0761
  • Miller, T., & Triana, M. C. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (5), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
  • Montgomery, N. V., & Cowen, A. P. (2020). How leader gender influences external audience response to organizational failures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000176
  • Ng, E. S., & Sears, G. J. (2017). The glass ceiling in context: The influence of CEO gender, recruitment practices and firm internationalisation on the representation of women in management. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 133–151. https://doi. org/10.1111/1748-8583.12135
  • Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.022
  • Nguyen, T. H. H., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. K. (2020). Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101554
  • Parboteeah, K. P., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2008). Managers’ gender role attitudes: A country institutional profile approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400384
  • Pathan, S., & Faff, R. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1573–1589. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.016
  • Pham, T. D. T., & Lo, F. Y. (2023). How does top management team diversity influence firm performance? A causal complexity analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186(part B), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122162
  • Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta- analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/amj.2013.0319
  • Reguera-Alvarado, N., de Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9
  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00233
  • Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298
  • Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over- represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100. https:// doi.org/10.1037/h0037128
  • Schopohl, L., Urquhart, A., & Zhang, H. (2020). Female CFOs, leverage and the moderating role of board diversity and CEO power. Journal of Corporate Finance, 101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101858
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In J. T. Jost (Ed.), Political psychology: Key readings in political psychology. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984.
  • Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979. tb00324
  • Terjesen, S., Barbosa Couto, E., & Morais Francisco, P. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
  • Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65. https://doi. org/10.1017/beq.2016.7
  • Torchia, M., Calabr` o, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
  • Triana, M. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2014). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0842
  • Uribe-Bohorquez, M. V., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-S´anchez, I. M. (2019). Women on boards and efficiency in a business-orientated environment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ csr.1659
  • Valls Martínez, M. C., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1825
  • Valls Martínez, M. C., Martín-Cervantes, P. A., & Miralles-Quir´ os, M. M. (2022). Sustainable development and the limits of gender policies on corporate boards in Europe. A comparative analysis between developed and emerging markets. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100168
  • Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x
  • Wang, G., Holmes, R. M., Devine, R. A., & Bishoff, J. (2018). CEO gender differences in careers and the moderating role of country culture: A meta-analytic investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 148, 30–53. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.04.002. September.
  • Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.205
  • Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
  • Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.004