La agenda feminista del siglo XXIcontinúa la reacción

  1. Blanco García, Ana Isabel 1
  2. Aguado Cabezas, Elena 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Journal:
Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia
  1. Blanco García, Ana Isabel (coord.)
  2. Aguado Cabezas, Elena (coord.)

ISSN: 1699-597X

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: The Feminist Agenda

Issue: 18

Pages: 1-22

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18002/CG.I18.7701 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia

Abstract

The concern for gender equality and its consideration as a fundamental element for social development is very present in our societies. Numerous movements have emerged to denounce the oppression of women from various perspectives. These diverse proposals include, in different ways, a cross-cutting vision of gender relations, reflecting a conceptual challenge and a desire to modify society in order to build a more just and equal social system. The existing gender inequalities in contemporary societies are the result of a historical construction that has generally granted power and public representation to men, while assigning women a subsidiary and complementary role. The progressive understanding of this situation as a structural issue that goes beyond individual realities has allowed for progress in building more balanced power relations between sexes. Feminism is an enlightenment-rooted universalism that has always asserted its political agenda with the help of universal declarations. Said agenda, related to its practical implementation, has removed women from ethicality, turning what was accepted as custom into political oppression. The progressive diffusion, implantation and uncritical acceptance by large sectors of the population of the postulates of postmodernity, along with the more or less overlapping slippage of the postulates of posthumanism, have caused internal tensions within contemporary feminism, while at the same time forced the movement to rearm itself theoretically. For this reason, we have convened this new monograph on the Feminist Agenda, aware of both its relevance in the here and now and also that it should take into account the turbulence to which we are subjected and which we have been carefully observing in recent years. We hope it will be useful to focus a debate that, in our opinion, is necessary, urgent and cannot be postponed to continue fulfilling the objective of achieving real equality between men and women.   The issue opens with 6 invited articles on current feminism: “They call it feminism and it is not” (Alicia Miyares), “Some legal consequences that can be derived from the entry into force of the Trans Law” (Altamira Gonzalo Valgañón), “Feminist Objections to the Law for the real and effective equality of trans people and for the guarantee of the rights of LGTBI people” (Amparo Mañés Barbé), "Review of some arguments in favor of `sexual assistance´” (Ana Cuervo Pollán), “`He says that he loves me´. Gender violence in adolescence” (Teresa San Segundo) and “The usurpation of the reproductive capacity of women: From `empty vessels´ to `surrogate mothers´” (Ana de Miguel Álvarez). The twenty-five contributions that make up the Monograph provide new data on the above topics and their relationship with the Feminist Agenda. To this content are added twenty articles from the Open Tribune, grouped into themes that concern the situation of gender studies, social control and maternity, violence against women and their education. Six book reviews close the issue.

Bibliographic References

  • Amorós, Celia (1997): Tiempo de feminismo: sobre feminismo, proyecto ilustrado y postomodernidad [ie postmodernidad]. Vol. 41. Universitat de València.
  • Amorós, Celia. (2008) “Conceptualizar es politizar”. En: Patricia Laurenzo, María Luisa Maqueda Abreu y Ana maría Rubio Castro (coords.): Género, violencia y derecho. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Amorós, Celia y De Miguel, Ana (2005): “Introducción: Teoría feminista y movimientos feministas”. En: Celia Amorós y Ana de Miguel Álvarez (coord..): Teoría feminista. De la ilustración a la globalización. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, pp. 13-90.
  • Blanco García, Ana Isabel (1996): “La polémica biológico-social acerca de la división sexual del trabajo”. En: Ana Isabel Blanco García (comp.): Mujer, Violencia y Medios de Comunicación. León: Universidad de León. Secretariado de Publicaciones.
  • Bostrom, Nick (2001): “What is transhumanism”. Disponible en: https://nickbostrom.com/old/transhumanism [24/06/2023].
  • Bostrom, Nick (2003): The Transhumanist FAQ. A General Introduction. USA: World Transhumanist Association. Disponible en: https://nickbostrom.com/old/transhumanism [24/06/2023].
  • Bostrom, Nick. (2005): “Transhumanist values”. En: Journal of philosophical research, nº. 30, Supplement, pp. 3-14.
  • Butler, Judith (2011): Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Londres: Routledge.
  • Castellanos-Torres, Esther; Mateos, José Tomás y Chilet-Rosell, Elisa (2021): “COVID-19 en clave de género”. En: Gaceta sanitaria, vol. 34, nº. 5, pp. 419-421.
  • De Miguel, Ana (2021): Ética para Celia. Barcelona: Ediciones B.
  • Donath, Orna (2016): Madres arrepentidas: una mirada radical a la maternidad y sus falacias sociales. Barcelona: Reservoir Books.
  • Fundación Foessa (2019): VIIIInforme sobre exclusión y desarrollo social en España 2019. Madrid: Cáritas Española Eds.
  • Londoño Bernal, Nicolás (2020): “Expresiones de la violencia basada en género, en el marco del confinamiento por COVID-19”. En: Nova, vol. 18, nº. 35, pp. 107-113. Disponible en: https://revistas.unicolmayor.edu.co/index.php/nova/article/view/1823 [24/06/2023].
  • Macionis,John y Plummer, Ken (2013): Sociología. Londres: Pearson
  • Parkin, Frank (1984): “El cierre social como exclusión”. En: Frank Parkin: Marxismo y teoría de clases: una crítica burguesa. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 69-108.
  • Preciado, P. Beatriz (2012): “Teoría Queer: Notas para una política de lo anormal o contra-historia de la sexualidad”. En: Observaciones filosóficas, nº. 15. Disponible en: https://www.observacionesfilosoficas.net/queer-teoria.htm [24/06/2023].
  • Puleo, Alicia (1993) (ed.): La Ilustración olvidada. La polémica de los sexos en el siglo XVIII. Madrid: Antrhopodos.
  • Richards, Janet Radcliffe (1982): The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Enquiry. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Tezanos, José Félix (1988): “La estratificación social: Desigualdad y jerarquización”. En: Salustiano del Campo (ed.): Tratado de Sociología. Vol. l. Madrid: Taurus, pp. 287-319.
  • Valcárcel, Amelia (2001): La memoria colectiva y los retos del feminismo. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
  • Valcárcel, Amelia. (2023): La civilización femenista. Madrid: La Esfera de los Libros.
  • Thomas, William I. (1923): The Unadjusted Girl with cases and standpoint for behavior analysis. Boston: Little Brown and Company Editors
  • West, Candace y Zimmerman, Don H. (1987): “Doing gender”. En: Gender & Society, vol. 1, nº. 2, pp. 125-151.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2014): “Five faces of oppression”. En: Thomas W. Wartenberg (ed.): Rethinking power, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 174-195.
Data source: Dialnet