Early career researchers and predatory journals during the Covid-19 pandemic. An international analysis

  1. David Nicholas 1
  2. Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo 2
  3. Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri 3
  4. Eti Herman 1
  5. David Clark 1
  6. Jie Xu 4
  7. Abdullah Abrizah 5
  8. Marzena Świgoń 6
  9. Anthony Watkinson 1
  10. David Sims 7
  11. Hamid R. Jamali 8
  12. Carol Tenopir 7
  13. Suzie Allard 7
  1. 1 CIBER Research Ltd.
  2. 2 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  3. 3 University of Lyon System
    info

    University of Lyon System

    Lyon, Francia

    ROR https://ror.org/01rk35k63

  4. 4 Wuhan University
    info

    Wuhan University

    Wuhan, China

    ROR https://ror.org/033vjfk17

  5. 5 University of Malaya
    info

    University of Malaya

    Kuala Lumpur, Malasia

    ROR https://ror.org/00rzspn62

  6. 6 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
    info

    University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

    Olsztyn, Polonia

    ROR https://ror.org/05s4feg49

  7. 7 University of Tennessee
  8. 8 Charles Sturt University
    info

    Charles Sturt University

    Bathurst, Australia

    ROR https://ror.org/00wfvh315

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Transparency

Volumen: 32

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.ENE.17 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

Se entrevistó a alrededor de 170 investigadores noveles (early career researchers, ECR) de 8 países sobre toda la variedad de actitudes y prácticas de comunicación académica durante tiempos de pandemia, y este artículo analiza sus manifestaciones sobre las revistas depredadoras en diferentes contextos de la comunicación académica. Debido a la importancia del tema, solo hubo una pregunta dirigida exclusivamente a las revistas depredadoras, que indagó sobre políticas en lugar de acciones, lo que arrojó variados comentarios interesantes. Los ECR también ofrecieron información sobre prácticas de investigación cuestionables. La fuente de datos fue principalmente la entrevista final de tres realizadas, con algunas comparaciones con las rondas uno y dos. Los hallazgos revelan la existencia de una serie de políticas/directrices de evaluación formales e informales que dirigen a los ECR a revistas legítimas, lejos de las depredadoras. A pesar de ser junior, los ECR están acostumbrados a los criterios de lo que se considera prestigio y calidad y creen que la publicación depredadora ni siquiera es concebible. Están mucho más preocupados por la investigación de baja calidad, los preprints y en identificar las revistas “grises” que están en el límite de calidad. La pandemia ha aumentado el nivel de prácticas cuestionables y de investigación de baja calidad, pero las revistas depredadoras solo fueron señaladas por un número relativamente pequeño de ECR.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abalkina, Anna (2021). “Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive”. Scientometrics, n. 126, pp. 7123-7148. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0
  • Alecci, Scilla (2018). New international investigation tackles ‘fake science’ and its poisonous effects. Blog post, 20 July. https://www.icij.org/blog/2018/07/new-international-investigation-tackles-fake-science-and-its-poisonous-effects
  • Alrawadieh, Zaid (2018). “Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies”. Tourism and hospitality research, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358418800121
  • Bagues, Manuel F.; Sylos-Labini, Mauro; Zinovyeva, Natalia (2017). A walk on the wild side: An investigation into the quantity and quality of ‘predatory’ publications in Italian academia (N. 2017/01). LEM working paper series. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174551
  • Cobey, Kelly D.; Grudniewicz, Agnes; Lalu, Manuj M.; Rice, Danielle B.; Raffoul, Hanna; Moher, David (2019). “Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey”. BMJ open, v. 9, n. 3, e026516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516
  • Cohen, Andrew J.; Patino, German; Kamal, Puneet; Ndoye, Medina; Tresh, Annas; Mena, Jorge; Butler, Christie; Washington, Samuel; Breyer, Benjamin N. (2019). “Perspectives from authors and editors in the biomedical disciplines on predatory journals: survey study”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 21, n. 8, e13769. https://doi.org/10.2196/13769
  • Cortegiani, Andrea; Manca, Andrea; Lalu, Manoj; Moher, David (2020). “Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers”. International journal of public health, v. 65, n. 1, pp. 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w
  • Crotty, David (2017). “Predatory publishing as a rational response to poorly governed academic incentives”. The scholarly kitchen. Blog post, February 28. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/02/28/predatory-publishing-rational-response-poorly-governed-academic-incentives
  • Dadkhah, Mehdi; Borchardt, Glenn (2016). “Hijacked journals: an emerging challenge for scholarly publishing”. Aesthetic surgery journal, v. 36, n. 6, pp. 739-741. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw026
  • Dadkhah, Mehdi; Maliszewski, Tomasz; Da-Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira (2016). “Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics”. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, v. 12, n. 3, pp. 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x
  • Da-Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira (2020). “An alert to COVID-19 literature in predatory publishing venues”. The Journal of academic librarianship, v. 46, n. 5, 102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102187
  • Da-Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira (2021). “Challenges that early career researchers face in academic research and publishing: pre-and post-COVID-19 perspectives”. Exchanges: the interdisciplinary research journal, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 77-106. https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v9i1.882
  • Da-Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira; Dunleavy, Daniel J.; Moradzadeh, Mina; Eykens, Joshua (2021). „A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers”. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 10, pp. 8589-8616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04118-3
  • Demir, Selcuk-Besir (2018). “Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?”. Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 4, pp. 1296-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008
  • Dobusch, Leonhard; Heimstädt, Maximiliam; Mayer, Katja; Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2020). “Defining predatory journals: no peer review, no point”. Nature, v. 580, n. 7801, p. 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00911-x
  • Dunleavy, Daniel J. (2022). Progressive and degenerative journals: On the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/yskhj
  • Elliott, Tracey; Fazeen, Bisma; Asrat, Asfawossen; Cetto, Ana-María; Eriksson, Stefan; Looi, Lai-Meng; Negra, Diane (2022). “Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1458
  • Eykens, Joshua; Guns, Raf; Rahman, A. Jakaria; Engels, Tim C. (2019). “Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding”. PloS one, v. 14, n. 11, e0224541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224541
  • Frandsen, Tove-Faber (2017). “Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers”. Scientometrics, v. 113, n. 3, pp.1513-1528. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x
  • Frandsen, Tove-Faber (2019). “How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1230
  • Frandsen, Tove-Faber (2022). “Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles”. Learned publishing, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 598-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1489
  • Gasparyan, Armen-Yuri; Yessirkepov, Marlen; Diyanova, Svetlana N.; Kitas, George D. (2015). “Publishing ethics and predatory practices: a dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication”. Journal of Korean medical science, v. 30, n. 8, pp. 1010-1016. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010
  • Grimes, David-Robert; Bauch, Chris T.; Ioannidis, John P. A. (2018). “Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure”. Royal Society open science, v. 5, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171511
  • Grudniewicz, Agnes; Moher, David; Cobey, Kelly D.; Bryson, Gregory L.; Cukier, Samantha; Allen, Kristiann; Ardern, Clare; Balcom, Lesley; Barros, Tiago; Berger, Monica; Ciro, Jairo Buitrago et al. (2019). “Predatory journals: no definition, no defence”. Nature, v. 576, pp. 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
  • IAP - InterAcademy Partnership (2022). Combatting predatory academic journals and conferences. Report. March 2022. https://www.interacademies.org/publication/predatory-practices-report-English
  • Kurt, Serhat (2018). “Why do authors publish in predatory journals?”. Learned publishing, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
  • Linacre, Simon (2022). The predator effect: Understanding the past, present and future of deceptive academic journals. E-book. Ann Arbor, MI: Against the Grain (Media), LLC. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12739277
  • Marina, Tatiana; Sterligov, Ivan (2021). “Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level”. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 6, pp. 5019-5077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03899-x
  • McCann, Terence V.; Polacsek, Meg (2018). “False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals”. Journal of advanced nursing, v. 74, n. 4, pp. 809-817. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13483
  • Mertkan, Sefika; Aliusta, Gulen Onurkan; Suphi, Nilgun (2021). “Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review”. Research evaluation, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab032
  • Mills, David; Inouye, Kelsey (2021). “Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences”. Learned publishing, v. 34, n. 2, pp. 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1325
  • Moher, David; Shamseer, Larissa; Cobey, Kelly D.; Lalu, Manoj M.; Galipeau, James; Avey, Marc T.; Ahmadzai, Nadera; Alabousi, Mostafa; Barbeau, Pauline; Beck, Andrew; Daniel, Raymond; Frank, Robert; Ghannad, Mona; Hamel, Candyce; Hersi, Mona; Hutton, Brian; Isupov, Inga; McGrath, Trevor A.; McInnes, Matthew D. F.; Page, Matthew J. et al. (2017). “Stop this waste of people, animals and money”. Nature, v. 549, n. 7670, pp. 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a
  • Moher, David; Srivastava, Anubhav (2015). “You are invited to submit….”. BMC medicine, v. 13, 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3
  • NDR (2018). More than 5,000 German scientists have published papers in pseudo-scientific journals. https://www.ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/More-than-5000-German-scientists-have-published-papers-in-pseudo-scientific-journals,fakescience178.html
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Abrizah, Abdullah; Watkinson, Anthony; Xu, Jie; Sims, David; Serbina, Galina; Świgoń, Marzena; Jamali, Hamid R.; Tenopir, Carol; Allard, Suzie (2022), “Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic-era early career researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1488
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Świgoń, Marzena (2021). “Early career researchers and predatory publishing: The views and behaviours of the millennials”. Foresight and STI governance, v. 15, n. 1, pp. 56-65. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.56.65
  • Nicholas, David; Rodríguez‐Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017). “Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Rodríguez‐Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Clark, David; Herman, Eti (2019). “So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1232
  • Nobes, Andi; Harris, Siân (2019). “Open access in low-and middle-income countries: attitudes and experiences of researchers”. Emerald open research, v. 1, n. 17. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13325.1
  • Noga-Styron, Krystal E.; Olivero, J. Michael; Britto, Sarah (2017). “Predatory journals in the criminal justices sciences: getting our cite on the target”. Journal of criminal justice education, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 174-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1195421
  • Offord, Catherine (2018). “German scientists frequently publish in predatory journals”. The scientist, July 19. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/german-scientists-frequently-publish-in-predatory-journals-64518
  • Ojala, Marydee; Reynolds, Regina; Johnson, Kay G. (2020). “Predatory journal challenges and responses”. The serials librarian, v. 46, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2020.1722894
  • Perlin, Marcelo S.; Imasato, Takeyoshi; Borenstein, Denis (2018). “Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study”. Scientometrics, v. 116, n. 1, pp. 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2750-6
  • Pyne, Derek (2017). “The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 48, n. 3, pp. 137-160. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137
  • Salehi, Mohammad; Soltani, Mohammad; Tamleh, Hadis; Teimournezhad, Shohreh (2020). “Publishing in predatory open access journals: Authors’ perspectives”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1261
  • Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martín-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutiérrez, Juan-José (2022). “Jumping over the paywall: Strategies and motivations for scholarly piracy and other alternatives”. Information development (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221144429
  • Severin, Anna; Low, Nicola (2019). “Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases”. International journal of public health, v. 64, n. 1123-1124. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v64y2019i8d10.1007_s00038-019-01284-3.html
  • Severin, Anna; Strinzel, Michaela; Egger, Matthias; Domingo, Marc; Barros, Tiago (2021). “Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data”. BMJ open, v. 11, n. 7, e050270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050270
  • Shaghaei, Najmeh; Wien, Charlotte; Holck, Jakob; Thiesen, Anita L.; Ellegaard, Ole; Vlachos, Evgenios; Drachen, Thea (2018). “Being a deliberate prey of a predator: Researchers’ thoughts after having published in predatory journal”. Liber quarterly, v. 28, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10259
  • Shehata, Ahmed-Maher-Khafaga; Elgllab, Mohammed-Fathy-Mahmoud (2018). “Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap”. Learned publishing, v. 3, n. 3, pp. 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167
  • Shen, Cenyu; Björk, Bo-Christer (2015). “‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics”. BMC medicine, v. 13, 230. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
  • Siler, Kyle (2020). “Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 71, n. 11, pp. 1386-1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24339
  • Tella, Adeyinka (2020). “Nigerian academics patronizing predatory journals: implications for scholarly communication”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 51, n. 3, pp. 182-196. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.3.02
  • Wallace, Frederick H.; Perri, Timothy J. (2018). “Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals”. Scientometrics, v. 115, n. 2, pp. 749-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2690-1
  • Xia, Jingfeng; Harmon, Jennifer L.; Connolly, Kevin G.; Donnelly, Ryan M.; Anderson, Mary R.; Howard, Heather A. (2015). “Who publishes in ‘predatory’ journals?”. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, v. 66, n. 7, pp. 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet