Evaluación formativa de la actuación docente en la universidadUna experiencia práctica

  1. Ángeles Diez Fernández1 1
  2. M. Dolores Alonso-Cortés Fradejas 1
  3. Rachel A. Bovill 2
  4. Raquel Domínguez Fernández 1
  5. Roberto Fernández Fernández 1
  6. Marta Eva García González 1
  7. Inmaculada González Alonso 3
  8. Carlos Gutiérrez- García 1
  9. David Hortigüela Alcalá 1
  10. Ángel Pérez-Pueyo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info
    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de León
  2. 2 University of Sheffield
    info
    University of Sheffield

    Sheffield, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/05krs5044

    Geographic location of the organization University of Sheffield
  3. 3 Universidad de Burgos
    info
    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de Burgos
Show affiliations +
Book:
La evaluación educativa: entre la emoción y la razón
  1. Antonia Ramírez García (coord.)
  2. María Pilar Gutiérrez Arenas (coord.)

Publisher: Don Folio

ISBN: 978-84-17171-41-4

Year of publication: 2018

Pages: 368-374

Congress: Congreso de Evaluación Formativa y Compartida (11. 2018. Córdoba)

Type: Conference paper

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBULERIA editor
BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León: lock_openOpen access Externo

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This paper summarizes a practical experience of formative assessment carried out by IFAHE (Innovation through Formative Assessment in Higher Education) working group and the Professional Development Team for Learning and Teaching of the University of Sheffield during the academic year 2017-2018. Its main aim was to adapt and develop a process for the formative assessment of teaching performance (session-level) that could be valid for different areas of knowledge. The experience consisted in nine phases, which included theoretical and practical training, adaptation and development of assessment tools, observation of real teaching, feedbacks and discussion on the experience and its applicability in a wider university context. We conclude that the experience was satisfactory and could be of interest for the improvement of teaching in high education.

Data source: Dialnet