Educación Telemática en la Universidad: Un Estudio en Futuros Docentes

  1. Daniel Pattier 1
  2. Sheila García-Martín 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Aldizkaria:
REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación

ISSN: 1696-4713

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 20

Zenbakia: 3

Orrialdeak: 165-184

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación

Laburpena

The emergence of Information and Communication Technologies in the educational area has allowed the expansion of learning through telematic means. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the consequent closure of school institutions, led to the massive application of fully online or combined training (face-to-face and with telematics support). The objective of this research was to know the evaluations of university students who intend to be teachers, about the training they are receiving by telematic means. To do this, an online questionnaire was designed, validated and applied to 523 students from two universities from Spain and one from Portugal. Descriptive and multivariate analyzes were performed, obtaining statistically significant differences. The results show that telematic education is not evaluated in a particularly positive way by the students, highlighting that they miss socializing with their classmates, although they recognize that its implementation also offers advantages such as greater flexibility and a reduction in economic expenses. Finally, the need to transform teaching methodologies for an efficient transition from face-to-face to telematic learning is discussed, and concludes with guidelines to improve the quality and effectiveness of online and combined training plans for higher education students.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Adnan, M. yAnwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the Covid-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Online Submission, 1(2), 45-51.https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.2020261309
  • Ali, T. yHerrera, M. (2020). Distance learning during Covid-19: 7 equity considerations for schools and districts. Southern Education Foundation.
  • Bagriacik Yilmaz, A. yBanyard, P. (2020). Engagement in distance education settings: Atrend analysis.TurkishOnline Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 101-120.https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690362
  • Berrios-Aguayo, B., Molina-Jaén, M. D. yPantoja-Vallejo, A. (2020). Opinion of ICT coordinators on the incidence of telematicstools. Journal ofTechnology and Science Education, 10(1), 142-158. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.690
  • Burgos, M.,Beltrán-Pellicer, P. yGodino, J. D. (2020). La cuestión de la idoneidad de los vídeos educativos de matemáticas.Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(275), 27-50.https://doi.org/10.22550/REP78-1-2020-07
  • Cabrera, L. (2020). Efectos del coronavirus en elsistema de enseñanza: Aumenta la desigualdad de oportunidades educativas en España. RASE-Revista deSociología de la Educación, 13(2), 114-139. https://doi.org/10.7203/rase.13.2.17125
  • Camacho, I. yGuzmán, J. C. (2013). Teleformación: Realidad global impostergable en las políticas universitarias. Etic@net, 13(1), 357-378.
  • Cigerci, F. M. (2020). Slowmation experiences of pre-service teachers via distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic disease. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 9(1), 111-127.
  • Constate-Amores, A., Florenciano-Martínez, E., Navarro-Asencio, E. yFernández-Mellizo, M. (2021). Factores asociados al abandono universitario. Educación XX1, 24(1), 17-44. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.26889
  • Dilmaç, S. (2020). Students' opinions about the distance education to art and design courses in the pandemic process. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 113-126.https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p113
  • Dinh, L. P. yNguyen, T.T. (2020). Pandemic, social distancing, and social work education: Students’ satisfaction with online education in Vietnam. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1074-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1823365
  • Feito, R. (2020). Este es el fin de la escuela tal y como la conocemos. Unas reflexiones en tiempo de confinamiento. RASE. Revista de Sociología de la Educación, 13(2), 156-163.https://doi.org/10.7203/rase.13.2.17130
  • García-Martín, S. yCantón-Mayo, I. (2019). Use of technologies and academic performance in adolescent students. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal,59, 73-81.https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-07
  • García-Martín, J. yGarcía-Sánchez, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers & Education, 107, 54-67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
  • García-Peñalvo, F., Corell, A., Abella-García, V. y Grande, M. (2020). La evaluación online en la educación superior en tiempos de la Covid-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23013
  • Gentles, C. H. yHaynes-Brown, T. (2021). Latin American and Caribbean teachers’ transition to online teaching during the pandemic: Challenges, changes and lessons learned. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 61, 131-163. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.88054
  • Godoy, V. L. H., Morales, K. F. yPulido, J. E. (2018). La actitud hacia la educación en línea en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 349-364.https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.277451
  • Iranzo-García, P., Camarero, M., Barrios-Arós, C., Tierno-García, J. M. yGilabert-Medina, S. (2018). ¿Qué opinan los maestros sobre las competencias de liderazgo escolar y sobre su formación inicial? REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 16(3), 31-47.https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.3.002
  • Iso, A., Eizaguirre, A. y García-Olalla, A. (2020). Una revisión sistemática del concepto de actividad extracurricular en educación superior. Educación XX1, 23(2), 307-335.https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.25765
  • Johnston, J. P. (2020). Creating better definitions of distance education. Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), EJ1260793
  • Lembani, R., Gunter, A., Breines, M. y Dalu, M.(2020). The same course, different access: The digital divide between urban and rural distance education students in South Africa. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 70-84.https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1694876
  • Llanes Ordóñez, J., Méndez-Ulrich, J.L. y Montané López, A. (2021). Motivación y satisfacción académica delos estudiantes de educación: Una visión internacional. Educación XX1, 24(1), 45-68.https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.26491
  • Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R. yArchambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the Covid-19 pandemic.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391.
  • Márquez, C., Sandoval, M., Sánchez, S., Simón, C., Moriña, A., Morgado, B., Moreno-Medina, I., García, J. A., Díaz-Gandasegui, V. yElizalde-San Miguel, B. (2020). Evaluación de la inclusión en educación superior mediante indicadores. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(3), 33-51.https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.3.003
  • Martínez, N. (2017). Prospectiva educativa del satélite VENESAT-1 en contextos universitarios virtuales según proceso fenomenológico de Moustakas.Revista Electrónica de Humanidades, Educación y Comunicación Social,11(22), 260-287.
  • Nichols, M. (2020). Transforming universities with digital distance education: the future of formal learning.Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429463952
  • OECD.(2020).A helping hand: Education responding to the coronavirus pandemic.OECD.
  • Özgen, C. yReyhan, S. (2020). Satisfaction, utilitarian performance and learning expectations in compulsory distance education: Atest of mediation effect. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(6), 290-297. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3995
  • Park, C. y Kim, D. G. (2020). Exploring the roles of social presence and gender difference in online learning.Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 291-312.https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12207
  • Pattier, D. (2021). Science on YouTube: Successful edutubers. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review, 10(1), 1-15.https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revtechno.v10.2696
  • Pattier, D. yOlmos-Rueda, P. (2021). Administration and teachers: Evidence-based educational practices. Revista de Educación, 392, 33-58.https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-392-478
  • Prado Montes, A., Morales Caballero, A. yMolle Cassia, J. N. (2017). Síndrome de fatiga ocular y su relación con el medio laboral. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 63(249), 345-361.
  • Rajhans, V., Memon, U., Patil, V. yGoyal, A. (2020). Impact of Covidon academic activities and way forward in Indian optometry. Journal of Optometry, 13, 216-226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.002
  • Rana, K. yRana, K. (2020). ICT integration in teaching and learning activities in higher education: A case study of Nepal's teacher education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2020.01.003
  • Ricardo-Barreto, C. T., Molinares, D. J., Llinás, H., Santodomíngo, J. M. P., Acevedo, C. M. A., Rodríguez, P. D. A., Navaro, C. P. B. yVilla, S. M. V. (2020). Trends in using ICT resources by professors in HEIs. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 395-425. https://doi.org/10.28945/4601
  • Romero-García, C., de Paz-Lugo, P., Buzón-García, O. yNavarro-Asencio, E. (2021).Evaluación de una formación online basada en Flipped classroom. Revista de Educación, 391, 65-93. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-471
  • Romero Martínez, S. J., Ordóñez Camacho, X. G., Guillén-Gamez, F. D. yBravo Agapito, J. (2020). Attitudes toward technology among distance education students: Validation of an explanatory model. Online Learning, 24(2), 59-75.https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2028
  • Sari, T. yNayır, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360.https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.5872
  • Sepulveda-Escobar, P. yMorrison, A. (2020).Online teaching placement during the Covid-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 587-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981
  • Srijamdee, K. yPholphirul, P. (2020). Does ICT familiarity always help promote educational outcomes? Empirical evidence from PISA-Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2933-2970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10089-z
  • Villa, F. G., Litago, J. D. U. yFernández, A. S. (2020). Percepciones y expectativas en el alumnado universitario apartir de la adaptación a la enseñanza no presencial motivada por la pandemia de Covid-19.Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 99-119.https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-
  • Yang, R. (2020). China’s higher education during the Covid-19 pandemic: Some preliminary observations. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1317-1321.https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1824212
  • Yilmaz, F. G. K., Ustun, A. B. yYilmaz, R. (2020). Investigation of pre-service teachers' opinions on advantages and disadvantages of online formative assessment: An example of online multiple-choice exam. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning,2(1), 10-19.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet