La difusión de la producción científica en el ámbito de las Humanidadesel caso de la Universidad de León

  1. Andrés Fernández-Ramos
  2. Leticia Barrionuevo
Zeitschrift:
Investigación bibliotecológica

ISSN: 2448-8321,  0187-358X

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 36

Nummer: 90

Seiten: 47-65

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2022.90.58486 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Investigación bibliotecológica

Zusammenfassung

Abstract The dissemination of scholarly publications has become a new task for researchers. In addition to the traditional channels, other new ones have emerged to make this kind of publications known to the rest of the scientific community, such as academic social networks, author identifiers or institutional repositories. In this article, it is compared the use made by researchers in the Humanities area of the University of León of five platforms for the dissemination of scientific production: ORCID, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu and the institutional repository of the University of León. The presence of researchers on these platforms and the scientific production deposited or linked to their profile are analyzed. A large presence of these researchers is observed in ORCID and in the institutional repository, although, in many cases, their profiles are incomplete and outdated. Their presence in academic social networks is lower and the profiles created do not include all the scientific production of their authors. However, to deposit copies in open access, researchers prefer social networks to institutional repositories. It is necessary to promote the use of platforms for the dissemination of scientific production, especially institutional repositories, with the library being a key agent in this task.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Al-Aufi, Ali S.,Fulton, Crystal. (2014). Use of Social Networking Tools for Informal Scholarly Communication in Humanities and Social Sciences Disciplines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 147. 436
  • Baessa, Mohamed,Lery, Thibaut,Grenz, Daryl,Vijayakumar, J. K.. (2015). Connecting the Pieces: Using ORCIDs to Improve Research Impact and Repositories. F1000Research. 4.
  • Becerril García, Arianna,Aguado López, Eduardo. (2020). Una infraestructura abierta distribuida para la comunicación y evaluación científica: el reto para los repositorios institucionales. Revista PH. 100. 124
  • Björk, Bo Christer. (2017). Open Access to Scientific Articles: A Review of Benefits and Challenges. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 12. 247
  • Boock, Michael,Yordanova Todorova, Tania,Stoyanova Trencheva, Tereza,Todorova, Radostina. (2020). Bulgarian Authors’ Open Access Awareness and Preferences. Library Management. 41. 91-102
  • Borrego, Ángel. (2016). Measuring Compliance with a Spanish Government Open Access Mandate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67. 757
  • Borrego, Ángel. (2017). Institutional Repositories versus ResearchGate: The Depositing Habits of Spanish Researchers. Learned Publishing. 30. 185
  • Campos-Freire, Francisco,Rúas-Araújo, Raúl. (2016). Uso de las redes sociales digitales profesionales y científicas: El caso de las tres universidades gallegas. El profesional de la información. 25. 431
  • Davis, Philip M.,Connolly, Matthew J. L.. (2007). Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-Use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine. 13.
  • Eva, Nicole C.,Tara, A. Wiebe. (2019). Whose Research Is It Anyway? Academic Social Networks Versus Institutional Repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 7.
  • Fathli, Margareta,Lundén, Tomas,Sjögårde, Peter. (2014). The Share of Open Access in Sweden 2011 - analyzing the OA outcome from Swedish universities. ScieCom Info. 10.
  • Fernández-Marcial, Viviana,González-Solar, Llarina. (2015). Promoción de la investigación e identidad digital: el caso de a Universidade da Coruña. El profesional de la información. 24. 656
  • Fernández-Ramos, Andrés,Barrionuevo, Leticia. (2021). Value-Added Services in Institutional Repositories in Spanish Public Universities. Information Research. 26.
  • García-Peñalvo, Francisco José. (2018). Identidad digital como investigadores. La evidencia y la transparencia de la producción científica. Education in the Knowledge Society. 19. 7-28
  • Gómez-Castaño, Javier. (2020). Repositorios digitales y redes sociales académicas: ¿una coexistencia necesaria?. Revista PH. 100. 73
  • Gruzd, Anatoliy,Staves, Kathleen,Wilk, Amanda. (2012). Connected Scholars: Examining the Role of Social Media in Research Practices of Faculty Using the UTAUT Model. Computers in Human Behavior. 28. 2340
  • Lynch, Clifford A.,Lippincott, Joan K.. (2005). Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005. D-Lib Magazine. 11.
  • Marín-Arraiza, Paloma,Mejías, Gabriela. (2020). Identificadores persistentes: la adopción del ORCID ID en España. Anuario ThinkEPI. 14.
  • Martín-Martín, Alberto,Orduna-Malea, Enrique. (2017). Can We Use Google Scholar to Identify Highly-Cited Documents?. Journal of Informetrics. 11. 152
  • Martínez-Méndez, Francisco Javier,López-Carreño, Rosana. (2019). La paulatina adopción de ORCID para la mejora de la identidad digital de las revistas científicas españolas en acceso abierto. Investigación Bibliotecológica. 33. 73-95
  • Mason, Shannon. (2020). Adoption and Usage of Academic Social Networks: A Japan Case Study. Scientometrics. 122. 1751
  • McDowell, Cat S.. (2007). Evaluating Institutional Repository Deployment in American Academe since Early 2005: Repositories by the Numbers, Part 2. D-Lib Magazine. 13.
  • Meishar-Tal, Hagit,Pieterse, Efrat. (2017). Why Do Academics Use Academic Social Networking Sites?. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 18.
  • Melero Melero, Remedios. (2020). Los porqués de los repositorios de acceso abierto y las redes académicas. Revista PH. 100. 60
  • Mikki, Susanne,Zygmuntowska, Marta,Gjesdal, Yvind Liland,Al Ruwehy, Hemed Ali. (2015). Digital Presence of Norwegian Scholars on Academic Network Sites-Where and Who Are They?. PLoS ONE. 10.
  • Nández, Gemma,Borrego, Ángel. (2013). Use of Social Networks for Academic Purposes: A Case Study. Electronic Library. 31. 781
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique. (2020). De la aldea pública de los repositorios institucionales a la metrópoli privada de ResearchGate. Revista PH. 100. 102
  • Ortega, José Luis. (2015). How Is an Academic Social Site Populated? A Demographic Study of Google Scholar Citations Population. Scientometrics. 104. 1-18
  • Ortega, José Luis. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review. 39. 520
  • Ovadia, Steven. (2013). When Social Media Meets Scholarly Publishing. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. 32. 194
  • Prieto Gutiérrez, Juan José. (2018). Conocimientos sin fronteras: colaboración científica e institucional en documentación e información. Universidad Complutense. Madrid.
  • Rodríguez Bravo, Blanca,Nicholas, David. (2020). Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles. El profesional de la información. 29.
  • Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio,Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio. (2017). Opiniones, actitudes y prácticas de los investigadores españoles hacia la publicación en acceso abierto. El profesional de la información. 26. 722
  • Sánchez Pérez, Javier. (2020). Hacia la colaboración entre repositorios y redes sociales académicas. Revista PH. 100. 120
  • Scherer, David. (2016). Making Institutional Repositories Work. Purdue University Press. EUA.
  • Thelwall, Mike,Kousha, Kayvan. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66. 876
  • Xia, Feng,Su, Xiaoyan,Wang, Wei,Zhang, Chenxin,Ning, Zhaolong,Lee, Ivan. (2016). Bibliographic Analysis of Nature Based on Twitter and Facebook Altmetrics Data. PLoS ONE. 11.
  • Yan, Weiwei,Zhang, Yin,Hu, Tao,Kudva, Sonali. (2021). How Does Scholarly Use of Academic Social Networking Sites Differ by Academic Discipline? A Case Study Using ResearchGate. Information Processing and Management. 58.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet