Medir la capacidad de innovación social en organizaciones complejas del tercer sector

  1. Hernández-Ascanio, José
  2. Aja Valle, Jaime
  3. Rueda López, Ramón
  4. Medina Viruel, Miguel Jesús
Zeitschrift:
Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1139-5737

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Nummer: 51

Seiten: 153-182

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5944/EMPIRIA.51.2021.30811 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

Zusammenfassung

Social innovation is an issue that in recent decades has acquired growing interest both from the academic world and from social actors who pay attention to meeting social needs and demands. However, social innovation raises problems in the construction of its theoretical corpus (in relation to foundations of a conceptual and methodological nature) that translates into difficulties of a praxeological nature. Contributing to this foundation is a necessity of the first order to advance in the construction of a coherent agenda in the field of social innovation. It is especially urgent to address deficits identified in three foci: a) the scope of the consolidation of a canonical definition; b) methodological aspects aimed at facilitating processes; and c) the identification of determinants and conditioning factors of the emergence of social innovation processes. This work aims to advance in this sense, using as a reference the context of complex organizations, especially in the Third Sector. This choice is due to the fact that the bibliography confirms that they are especially privileged actors in facilitating this type of process. The methodological option chosen is the application of a Grounded Theory approach that has been triangulated through the application of a DELPHI panel. Among the main achievements in the work carried out is, as has been said, the elaboration of a theoretical model to explain the processes of intentional social innovation, as well as the identification of its main related capacities, from which can carry out the design of a tool for measuring social innovation in complex Third Sector organizations.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Adams, D. y Hess, M. (2010). Social innovation and why it has policy significance. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21, (2), 139-55.
  • Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., y O’Riordan, T. (2017). Transformative social innovation and (dis) empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
  • Bassi, A. (2011) Social innovation: Some definitions. Boletín del Centro de Investigación
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.
  • Cunha, J. y Benneworth, P. S. (2013) “Universities’ contributions to social innovation: towards a theoretical framework” paper presented to “Cities as seedbeds for innovation, Annual Conference of the European Urban Research Association (EURA), Enschede, the Netherlands, 3rd-6th July, 2013.European Urban Research Association Conference 2013, 3-6 July, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Haxeltine, A., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., Kemp, R., Weaver, P., Backhaus, J., y O’ Riordan, T. (2013). Transformative social innovations: A sustainability transition perspective on social innovation. Social Frontiers.The next edge of social innovation research. https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1997.7032
  • Hernández – Ascanio, J., Tirado, P., & Ariza, A. (2016). El Concepto de Innovación Social:Ámbitos,Definiciones y Alcances teóricos. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 88, 165-199.
  • Hernández – Ascanio, J. (2020). ¿La innovacion social como metodo de investigacion participativo y sociopractico? Tendencias Sociales. Revista de Sociología. 6, 33 – 63.
  • Herrera Flores, J. (2005). Los derechos humanos como productos culturales. Crítica del humanismo abstracto. Madrid: Libros de la Catarata.
  • Hochgerner, J. (2011) The Analusis of Social Innovations as Social Practice, En línea: http //www.socialinnovation2011.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Analysis-ofSocial-Innovations-as-Social-Practice.pdf (Consulta 13-07-2016).
  • Howaldt, J. y Schwarz, M. (2010a) Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. En línea: http://www.asprea.org/imagenes/IMO%20Trendstudie_ Howaldt_englisch_Final%20.pdf (Consulta: 13-07-2016).
  • Howaldt, J., y Schwarz, M, (2010b). Soziale Innovation–Konzepte, Forschungsfelder und-perspektiven. Soziale Innovation, 87–108. Springer.
  • Hubrich, D. K., Schmitz, B., Mildenberger, G., & Bund, E. (2012). The measurement of social economies in Europe–A first step towards an understanding of social innovation: A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical, and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission–7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  • Kirwan, J.; Ilbery, B.; Maye, D. y Carey, J. (2013). Grassroots social innovations and food localisation: An investigation of the Local Food programme in England. Global Environmental Change, 23, (5), 830-37.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Kristen, P. et al. (2016) Toward a Theory of Social Innovation, Innovation Policy Lab White Paper 2016-01, Version Date: December 1st, 2015
  • Krlev, G., Bund, E., y Mildenberger, G., (2014). Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level, Information Systems Management, 31 (3), 200-224, DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
  • Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi. org/10.1080/10400410701397180
  • Marques, C.S.; Gerry, C.; Diniz, F. y Ferreira, A.L. (2012): Social innovation: determinants of the demand for high-quality institutional care by the elderly, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology. 2, (2), 186-202.
  • Moulaert, Frank and Van Dyck, B. (2013). Framing social innovation research: a sociology of knowledge perspective. En International Handbook on Social Innovation.
  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). the Open Book of Social Innovation. En The Young Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030166
  • Mulgan, G. y Albury, D. (2003): Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1-40.
  • Nicholls, A., and A. Murdock, (2012. The Nature of Social Innovation. Social Innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nicholls, A., J. Simon, M. Gabriel, and C. Whelan. (2016). New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Reeder, N., O’Sullivan, C., Tucker, S., Ramsden, P., & Mulgan, G. (2012). Strengthening social innovation in Europe: Journey to effective assessment and metrics. Brussels: European Union.
  • Schachter, M., Matti, C. y Alcántara E. (2014): Fostering Quality of Life through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case, Review of Policy Research, 29, (6), 672- 692.
  • Van der Have, R. P., and L. Rubalcaba. (2016). Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies? Research Policy 45 (9), 1923–1935.
  • Westley, F. 2008. The Social Innovation Dynamic. Social Innovation Generation, University of Waterloo.
  • Westley, F. (2013). Social Innovation and Resilience: How One Enhances the Other. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer, 6-8.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet