Water Quality Assessment

Referencias bibliográficas

• Venkatachalapathy, R., Karthikeyan, P.: Application of diatom-based indices for monitoring environmental quality of riverine ecosystems: a review. In: Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems, pp. 593–619. Springer (2015)
• Taylor, J., Prygiel, J., Vosloo, A., Pieter, A., van Rensburg, L.: Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia. 592(1), 455–464 (2007)
• Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Grenier, M., Dillon, P.J.: A diatom-based index for the biological assessment of eastern Canadian rivers: an application of correspondence analysis (CA). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63(8), 1793–1811 (2006)
• Rakowska, B., Szczepocka, E.: Demonstration of the Bzura River restoration using diatom indices. Biologia. 66(3), 411–417 (2011)
• Blanco, S., Bécares, E., Cauchie, H.-M., Hoffmann, L., Ector, L.: Comparison of biotic indices for water quality diagnosis in the Duero Basin (Spain). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Large Rivers. 161, 267–286 (2007)
• Taylor, J., van Vuuren, M.J., Pieterse, A.: The application and testing of diatom-based indices in the Vaal and Wilge Rivers, South Africa. Water SA. 33(1), (2007)
• Feio, M.J., Almeida, S.F., Craveiro, S.C., Calado, A.J.: A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic diatom communities. Ecol. Indic. 9(3), 497–507 (2009)
• Schneider, S.C., Kahlert, M., Kelly, M.G.: Interactions between pH and nutrients on benthic algae in streams and consequences for ecological status assessment and species richness patterns. Sci. Total Environ. 444, 73–84 (2013)
• Soininen, J.: Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms—a review. Diatom Res. 22(2), 473–490 (2007)
• Bere, T.: Are diatom-based biotic indices developed in eutrophic, organically enriched waters reliable monitoring metrics in clean waters? Ecol. Indic. 62, 312–316 (2016)
• Atazadeh, I., Sharifi, M., Kelly, M.: Evaluation of the Trophic Diatom Index for assessing water quality in River Gharasou, western Iran. Hydrobiologia. 589(1), 165–173 (2007)
• Stenger-Kovács, C., Buczko, K., Hajnal, E., Padisák, J.: Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia. 589(1), 141–154 (2007)
• Blanco, S.: Environmental factors controlling lake diatom communities: a meta-analysis of published data. Biogeosci. Discuss. 11(11), 15889–15909 (2014)
• Bate, G., Smailes, P., Adams, J.: A water quality index for use with diatoms in the assessment of rivers. Water SA. 30(4), 493–498 (2004)
• Stevenson, R., Pan, Y.: Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, pp. 57–85 (1999)
• Kelly, M.: Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Res. 32(1), 236–242 (1998)
• Kelly, M.: Use of community-based indices to monitor eutrophication in European rivers. Environ. Conserv. 25(1), 22–29 (1998)
• Kelly, M., et al.: The Trophic Diatom Index: A User’s Manual Revised edition R&D Technical Report E2/TR2. Environment Agency, Bristol (2001)
• Fornells, N.P., Solà, C., Munné, A.: QBR: un índice rápido para la evaluación de la calidad de los ecosistemas de ribera. Tecnología del Agua. 175, 20–39 (1998)
• Pardo, I., et al.: El hábitat de los ríos mediterráneos. Diseño de un índice de diversidad de hábitat. Limnetica. 21(3–4), 115–133 (2002)
• Soeprobowati, T.R., Tandjung, S.D., Sutikno, S., Hadisusanto, S., Gell, P.: The minimum number of valves for diatoms identification in Rawapening Lake, Central Java. BIOTROPIA Southeast Asian J. Trop. Biol. 23(2), 97–100 (2017)
• Chessman, B., Growns, I., Currey, J., Plunkett-Cole, N.: Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshw. Biol. 41(2), 317–331 (1999)
• Rimet, F., Bouchez, A.: Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 406, 01 (2012)
• Rice, A., Baird, E., Eaton, R.: Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC (2017)
• Sournia, A.: Phytoplankton Manual. UNESCO, Paris (1978)
• Utermöhl, H.: Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik: Mit 1 Tabelle und 15 abbildungen im Text und auf 1 Tafel. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Mitteilungen. 9(1), 1–38 (1958)
• Lund, J., Kipling, C., Le Cren, E.: The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia. 11(2), 143–170 (1958)
• CEN: Water quality-Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. EN 13946: 2003. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Geneva (2003)
• CEN: Water Quality–Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters. EN 14407: 2004. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Geneva (2004)
• Kelly, M.: International and European standards for algal-based monitoring. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 1, 77–81 (2004)
• Kelly, M., et al.: Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol. 10(2), 215 (1998)
• CHD: Metodología para el establecimiento del estado ecológico según la Directiva Marco del Agua. Protocolos de muestreo y análisis para fitobentos (microalgas bentónicas), pp. 1–33. CHD, Zaragoza (2005)
• Pardo, I., García, L., Delgado, C., Costas, N., Abraín, R.: Protocolos de muestreo de comunidades biológicas acuáticas fluviales en el ámbito de las Confederaciones Hidrográficas del Miño-Sil y Cantábrico. MARM, Madrid (2010)
• Stevenson, R., Bahls, L.: Periphyton protocols: revision to rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA, Washington, DC (1999)
• Blanco, S., Álvarez, I., Cejudo, C.: A test on different aspects of diatom processing techniques. J. Appl. Phycol. 20(4), 445–450 (2008)
• Moss, B., et al.: The estimation of numbers and pigment content in epipelic algal populations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11(4), 584–595 (1966)
• Battarbee, R.W.: A new method for the estimation of absolute microfossil numbers, with reference especially to diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18(4), 647–653 (1973)
• McBride, T.P.: Preparing random distributions of diatom valves on microscope slides. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 1627–1629 (1988)
• Schrader, H.: Proposal for a standardized method of cleaning diatom-bearing deep-sea and land-exposed marine sediments. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 45, 403–409 (1973)
• Alverson, A.J., Manoylov, K.M., Stevenson, R.J.: Laboratory sources of error for algal community attributes during sample preparation and counting. J. Appl. Phycol. 15(5), 357–369 (2003)
• Van der Werff, A.: A new method of concentrating and cleaning diatoms and other organisms. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen. 12(1), 276–277 (1953)
• Setty, M.A.P.: Preparation and method of study of fossil diatoms. Micropaleontology. 12, 511–514 (1966)
• Brown, S.-D., Austin, A.: A method of collecting periphyton in lentic habitats with procedures for subsequent sample preparation and quantitative assessment. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie. 56(4), 557–580 (1971)
• Ma, J.C.W., Jeffrey, L.M.: Description and comparison of a new cleaning method of diatom frustules for light and electron microscope studies. J. Microsc. 112(2), 235–238 (1978)
• Carr, J.M., Hergenrader, G.L., Troelstrup Jr., N.H.: A simple, inexpensive method for cleaning diatoms. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 152–157 (1986)
• Scherer, R.P.: A new method for the determination of absolute abundance of diatoms and other silt-sized sedimentary particles. J. Paleolimnol. 12(2), 171–179 (1994)
• Charles, D.F., Knowles, C., Davis, R.S.: Protocols for the analysis of algal samples collected as part of the US Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Patrick Center for Environmental Research Report, Philadelphia, PA (2002)
• Rings, A., Lücke, A., Schleser, G.H.: A new method for the quantitative separation of diatom frustules from lake sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods. 2(1), 25–34 (2004)
• Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Stelzer, D., Hofmann, G., Gutowski, A., Foerster, J.: Instruction protocol for the ecological assessment of running waters for implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive: macrophytes and phytobenthos. Bavarian Environment Agency, Augsburg (2006)
• Blanco, S., Becares, E.: Metodo de muestreo de diatomeas epífitas en lagunas para la aplicación de la Directiva Marco del Agua. Tecnología del Agua. 261, 48–53 (2006)
• Li, J., Chen, J.: An effective cleaning method for producing pure diatom samples from lake sediments. Earth Environ. 35(1), 91–96 (2007)
• Metfies, K., et al.: An optimized protocol for the identification of diatoms, flagellated algae and pathogenic protozoa with phylochips. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 7(6), 925–936 (2007)
• Debenest, T., Silvestre, J., Coste, M., Delmas, F., Pinelli, E.: A new cell primo-culture method for freshwater benthic diatom communities. J. Appl. Phycol. 21(1), 65 (2009)
• Evans, K.M., Mann, D.G.: A proposed protocol for nomenclaturally effective DNA barcoding of microalgae. Phycologia. 48(1), 70–74 (2009)
• Díaz-Palma, P., Alucema, A., Hayashida, G., Maidana, N.: Development and standardization of a microalgae test for determining deaths by drowning. Forensic Sci. Int. 184(1–3), 37–41 (2009)
• Fetscher, A.E., Busse, L., Ode, P.R.: Standard operating procedures for collecting stream algae samples and associated physical habitat and chemical data for ambient bioassessments in California. California State Water Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP 2 (2009)
• Watanabe, T., Kodama, Y., Mayama, S.: Application of a novel cleaning method using low-temperature plasma on tidal flat diatoms with heterovalvy or delicate frustule structure. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. Phila. 160(1), 83–87 (2010)
• Serieyssol, K., et al.: Diatom fossils in mires: a protocol for extraction, preparation and analysis in palaeoenvironmental studies. Mires Peat. 7(12), 1–11 (2010)
• Lang, I., Kaczmarska, I.: A protocol for a single-cell PCR of diatoms from fixed samples: method validation using Ditylum brightwellii (T. West) Grunow. Diatom Res. 26(1), 43–49 (2011)
• Zoto, G.A., Dillon, D.O., Schlichting Jr., H.E.: A rapid method for clearing diatoms for taxonomic and ecological studies. Phycologia. 12(1), 69–70 (1973)
• Friedrichs, L., Maier, M., Hamm, C.: A new method for exact three-dimensional reconstructions of diatom frustules. J. Microsc. 248(2), 208–217 (2012)
• Mendes, T., Almeida, S.F., Feio, M.J.: Assessment of rivers using diatoms: effect of substrate and evaluation method. Arch. Hydrobiol. 179(4), 267–279 (2012)
• MacDonald, L.A., Balasubramaniam, A.M., Hall, R.I., Wolfe, B.B., Sweetman, J.N.: Developing biomonitoring protocols for shallow Arctic lakes using diatoms and artificial substrate samplers. Hydrobiologia. 683(1), 231–248 (2012)
• Vermeulen, S., Lepoint, G., Gobert, S.: Processing samples of benthic marine diatoms from Mediterranean oligotrophic areas. J. Appl. Phycol. 24(5), 1253–1260 (2012)
• Gautam, S., Arya, A., Vinayak, V.: Protocol to establish axenic cultures for diatoms of fresh water. Int. J. Sci. Res. 5(11), 410–418 (2016)
• Tennant, R.K., et al.: A new flow cytometry method enabling rapid purification of fossil pollen from terrestrial sediments for AMS radiocarbon dating. J. Quat. Sci. 28(3), 229–236 (2013)
• Seo, Y., Sato, S., Kuroki, K., Kishida, T.: A simple DNA coprecipitation method for the detection of diatoms in heart blood. Forensic Sci. Int. 232(1–3), 154–159 (2013)
• Kimura, K., Tomaru, Y.: A unique method for culturing diatoms on agar plates. Plankton Benthos Res. 8(1), 46–48 (2013)
• Zhao, J., et al.: Application of the microwave digestion-vacuum filtration-automated scanning electron microscopy method for diatom detection in the diagnosis of drowning. J. Forensic Legal Med. 33, 125–128 (2015)
• Jiang, W., Pan, H., Wang, F., Jiang, M., Deng, X., Li, J.: A rapid sample processing method to observe diatoms via scanning electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phycol. 27(1), 243–248 (2015)
• Warnock, J.P., Scherer, R.P.: A revised method for determining the absolute abundance of diatoms. J. Paleolimnol. 53(1), 157–163 (2015)
• Wang, H., et al.: A simple digestion method with a Lefort aqua regia solution for diatom extraction. J. Forensic Sci. 60, S227–S230 (2015)
• Stancheva, R., Busse, L., Kociolek, J., Sheath, R.: Standard operating procedures for laboratory processing and identification of stream algae. California State Water Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP 0003 (2015)
• Morin, S., Gómez, N., Tornés, E., Licursi, M., Rosebery, J.: Benthic diatom monitoring and assessment of freshwater environments: standard methods and future challenges. In: Aquatic Biofilms, Ecology, Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment, pp. 111–124 (2016)
• Ferrara, M.A., De Tommasi, E., Coppola, G., De Stefano, L., Rea, I., Dardano, P.: Diatom valve three-dimensional representation: a new imaging method based on combined microscopies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(10), 1645 (2016)
• Mansilla, C., Novais, M.H., Faber, E., Martínez-Martínez, D., De Hosson, J.T.: On the 3D reconstruction of diatom frustules: a novel method, applications and limitations. J. Appl. Phycol. 28(2), 1097–1110 (2016)
• Saba, F., et al.: A rapid and reproducible genomic DNA extraction protocol for sequence-based identification of archaea, bacteria, cyanobacteria, diatoms, fungi and green algae. J. Med. Bacteriol. 5(3–4), 22–28 (2017)
• Rojas-Camacho, O., Forero, M.G., Menéndez, J.M.: A tuning method for diatom segmentation techniques. Appl. Sci. 7(8), 762 (2017)
• Barragán, C., Wetzel, C.E., Ector, L.: A standard method for the routine sampling of terrestrial diatom communities for soil quality assessment. J. Appl. Phycol. 30(2), 1095–1113 (2018)
• Bayer, M., et al.: ADIAC: Using computer vision technology for automatic diatom identification. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Diatom Symposium, Athens, pp. 537–562 (2000)
• Du Buf, H., et al.: Diatom identification: a double challenge called ADIAC. In: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Venice, pp. 734–739 (1999)
• Du Buf, H., Bayer, M. (eds.): Automatic diatom identification. World Scientific, Singapore (2002)
• Kloster, M., Kauer, G., Beszteri, B.: SHERPA: an image segmentation and outline feature extraction tool for diatoms and other objects. BMC Bioinf. 15(1), 218 (2014)
• Kloster, M., Esper, O., Kauer, G., Beszteri, B.: Large-scale permanent slide imaging and image analysis for diatom morphometrics. Appl. Sci. 7(4), 330 (2017)
• Wishkerman, A., Hamilton, P.B.: Shape outline extraction software (DiaOutline) for elliptic Fourier analysis application in morphometric studies. Appl. Plant Sci. 6(12), (2018)
• Pappas, J., Kociolek, P., Stoermer, E.: Quantitative morphometric methods in diatom research. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 143, 281–306 (2014)
• Delgado, C., Novais, M.H., Blanco, S., Almeida, S.F.: Examination and comparison of Fragilaria candidagilae sp. Nov. with type material of Fragilaria recapitellata, F. capucina, F. perminuta, F. intermedia and F. neointermedia (Fragilariales, Bacillariophyceae). Phytotaxa. 231(1), 1–18 (2015)
• Poulíčková, A., Neustupa, J., Hašler, P., Tomanec, O., Cox, E.J.: A new species, Navicula lothargeitleri sp. nov., within the Navicula cryptocephala complex (Bacillariophyceae). Phytotaxa. 273(1), 23–33 (2016)
• Wengrat, S., Marquardt, G.C., de Campos Bicudo, D., de Mattos Bicudo, C.E., Wetzel, C.E., Ector, L.: Type analysis of Cymbella schubartii and two new Encyonopsis species (Bacillariophyceae) from southeastern Brazil. Phytotaxa. 221(3), 247–264 (2015)
• Bueno, G., Deniz, O., Pedraza, A., et al.: Automated diatom classification (Part A): handcrafted feature approaches. Appl. Sci. 7(8), 753 (2017)
• Pedraza, A., Bueno, G., Deniz, O., Cristóbal, G., Blanco, S., Borrego-Ramos, M.: Automated diatom classification (Part B): a deep learning approach. Appl. Sci. 7(5), 460 (2017)
• Pedraza, A., et al.: Lights and pitfalls of convolutional neural networks for diatom identification. Optics, Photonics and Digital Technologies for Imaging Applications V, International Society for Optics and Photonics 106790G (2018)
• Kelly, M., et al., A DNA based Diatom Metabarcoding Approach for Water Framework Directive Classification of Rivers (2018).
• Malviya, S.: Global Diatom Biodiversity: An Assessment Using Metabarcoding Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Paris (2015)
• Nanjappa, D., Audic, S., Romac, S., Kooistra, W.H., Zingone, A.: Assessment of species diversity and distribution of an ancient diatom lineage using a DNA metabarcoding approach. PLoS One. 9(8), e103810 (2014)
• Moniz, M.B.J., Kaczmarska, I.: Barcoding diatoms: is there a good marker? Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 65–74 (2009)
• Zimmermann, J., Jahn, R., Gemeinholzer, B.: Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Org. Divers. Evol. 11(3), 173 (2011)
• Rivera, S., Vasselon, V., Jacquet, S., Bouchez, A., Ariztegui, D., Rimet, F.: Metabarcoding of lake benthic diatoms: from structure assemblages to ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia. 807(1), 37–51 (2018)
• Zimmermann, J.: DNA barcoding and eDNA barcoding in diatoms. Ph.D. Dissertation, Giessen (2015)
• Vasselon, V., Domaizon, I., Rimet, F., Kahlert, M., Bouchez, A.: Application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding to diatom biomonitoring: do DNA extraction methods matter? Freshw. Sci. 36(1), 162–177 (2017)
• Vasselon, V., Rimet, F., Tapolczai, K., Bouchez, A.: Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France). Ecol. Indic. 82, 1–12 (2017)
• Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., Cordonier, A., Straub, F., Iseli, J., Esling, P., Pawlowski, J.: Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17(6), 1231–1242 (2017)
• Piredda, R., Simeone, M.C., Attimonelli, M., Bellarosa, R., Schirone, B.: Prospects of barcoding the Italian wild dendroflora: oaks reveal severe limitations to tracking species identity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11(1), 72–83 (2011)
• Hoef-Emden, K.: Pitfalls of establishing DNA barcoding systems in protists: the Cryptophyceae as a test case. PLoS One. 7(8), e43652 (2012)
• Fittipaldi, M., Codony, F., Adrados, B., Camper, A.K., Morató, J.: Viable real-time PCR in environmental samples: can all data be interpreted directly? Microb. Ecol. 61(1), 7–12 (2011)
• Urbánková, P., Veselá, J.: DNA-barcoding: a case study in the diatom genus Frustulia (Bacillariophyceae). Nova Hedwigia. 142, 147–162 (2013)
• Khan-Bureau, D., Ector, L., Morales, E.A., Wade, E.J., Lewis, L.A.: Contrasting morphological and DNA barcoding methods for diatom (Bacillariophyta) identification from environmental samples in the Eightmile River in Connecticut. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 146, 279–302 (2018)
• Hering, D., Moog, O., Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.: Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia. 516(1–3), 1–20 (2004)
• Sandin, L., Verdonschot, P.F.: Stream and river typologies—major results and conclusions from the STAR project. In: The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods, pp. 33–37. Springer (2006)
• CEDEX: Directiva 2000/60/CE. Análisis de las características de las demarcaciones. Caracterización de los tipos de ríos y lagos. MARM, Madrid (2004)
• Tison, J., et al.: Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydrosystem scale. Water Res. 39(14), 3177–3188 (2005)
• Grenier, M., Lavoie, I., Rousseau, A.N., Campeau, S.: Defining ecological thresholds to determine class boundaries in a bioassessment tool: the case of the Eastern Canadian Diatom Index (IDEC). Ecol. Indic. 10(5), 980–989 (2010)
• Pardo, I., et al.: A predictive diatom-based model to assess the ecological status of streams and rivers of Northern Spain. Ecol. Indic. 90, 519–528 (2018)
• Karr, J.R.: Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1(1), 66–84 (1991)
• Leira, M., Sabater, S.: Diatom assemblages distribution in catalan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Water Res. 39(1), 73–82 (2005)
• Dallas, H.F.: Ecological status assessment in Mediterranean rivers: complexities and challenges in developing tools for assessing ecological status and defining reference conditions. Hydrobiologia. 719(1), 483–507 (2013)
• Munné, A., Prat, N.: Effects of Mediterranean climate annual variability on stream biological quality assessment using macroinvertebrate communities. Ecol. Indic. 11(2), 651–662 (2011)
• Sánchez-Montoya, M., et al.: Defining criteria to select reference sites in Mediterranean streams. Hydrobiologia. 619(1), 39 (2009)
• Coste, M., Tison, J., Delmas, F.: Flores diatomiques des cours d’eau: proposition de valeurs limites du «Bon État» pour l’IPS et l’IBD. Document de travail–Unité de Recherche Qualité des Eaux–Cemagref, Bordeaux (2004)
• Hawkins, C.P., Olson, J.R., Hill, R.A.: The reference condition: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29(1), 312–343 (2010)
• Kelly, M.: Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive. Eur. J. Phycol. 48(4), 437–450 (2013)
• Álvarez-Blanco, I., Blanco, S., Cejudo-Figueiras, C., Bécares, E.: The Duero Diatom Index (DDI) for river water quality assessment in NW Spain: design and validation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 185(1), 969–981 (2013)
• Lobo, E.A., Schuch, M., Heinrich, C.G., et al.: Development of the Trophic Water Quality Index (TWQI) for subtropical temperate Brazilian lotic systems. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187(6), 354 (2015)
• Rimet, F.: Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia. 683(1), 1–24 (2012)
• Kelly, M., Whitton, B.A.: Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers. Hydrobiologia. 384(1–3), 55–67 (1998)
• Zelinka, M.: Zur Prazisierung der biologischen klassifikation der Reinheid fliessender Gewasser. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57, 389–407 (1961)
• CEMAGREF: Etude des méthodes biologiques quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité, Lyon (1982)
• Blanco, S., et al.: Diatom assemblages and water quality assessment in the Duero Basin (NW Spain). Belg. J. Bot. 39–50 (2008)
• Potapova, M., Charles, D.F.: Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecol. Indic. 7(1), 48–70 (2007)
• Rott, E., Pipp, E., Pfister, P.: Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algol. Stud. 110(1), 91–115 (2003)
• Delgado, C., Pardo, I., García, L.: A multimetric diatom index to assess the ecological status of coastal Galician rivers (NW Spain). Hydrobiologia. 644(1), 371–384 (2010)
• Barragán, C.: Desarrollo de un nuevo índice de diatomeas para la evaluación del estado ecológico de los ríos de la Demarcación Hidrográfica del Tajo. In: 18th Conference of the Iberian Association of Limnology (AIL 2016), Tortosa (2016)
• Besse-Lototskaya, A., Verdonschot, P.F., Coste, M., Van de Vijver, B.: Evaluation of European diatom trophic indices. Ecol. Indic. 11(2), 456–467 (2011)
• Descy, J.-P., Coste, M.: A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen. 24(4), 2112–2116 (1991)
• Round, F.: A review and methods for the use of epilithic diatoms for detecting and monitoring changes in river water quality. HMSO Publisher, London (1993)
• Taylor, J., de la Rey, P.A., van Rensburg, L.: Recommendations for the collection, preparation and enumeration of diatoms from riverine habitats for water quality monitoring in South Africa. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 30(1), 65–75 (2005)
• Almeida, et al.: Water quality assessment of rivers using diatom metrics across Mediterranean Europe: a methods intercalibration exercise. Sci. Total Environ. 476, 768–776 (2014)
• Prygiel, J., et al.: Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90–354): results of an intercomparison exercise. J. Appl. Phycol. 14(1), 27–39 (2002)
• Barbour, A.M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D., Stribling, J.B.: Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA, Washington (1998)
• Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Zugic-Drakulic, N., Winter, J., Fortin, C.: Using diatoms to monitor stream biological integrity in Eastern Canada: an overview of 10 years of index development and ongoing challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 475, 187–200 (2014)
• Hoagland, K.D., Roemer, S.C., Rosowski, J.R.: Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Am. J. Bot. 69(2), 188–213 (1982)
• Pringle, C.M.: Nutrient spatial heterogeneity: effects on community structure, physiognomy and diversity of stream algae. Ecology. 71(3), 905–920 (1990)
• Berthon, V., Bouchez, A., Rimet, F.: Using diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in south-eastern France. Hydrobiologia. 673(1), 259–271 (2011)
• Passy, S.: Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat. Bot. 86(2), 171–178 (2007)
• Kelly, M., et al., “Common freshwater diatoms of Britain and Ireland: an interactive key”, (2005).
• Lavoie, I., et al.: Diatom teratologies as biomarkers of contamination: are all deformities ecologically meaningful? Ecol. Indic. 82, 539–550 (2017)
• Coste, M., Boutry, S., Tison-Rosebery, J., Delmas, F.: Improvements of the Biological Diatom Index (BDI): description and efficiency of the new version (BDI-2006). Ecol. Indic. 9(4), 621–650 (2009)