Uso metodológico docente y rendimiento lector del alumnadoanálisis fundamentado en PISA lectura 2018
- Rodríguez-García, Alejandro 1
- Arias-Gago, Ana Rosa 1
- 1 Universidad de León, España
ISSN: 1575-0965
Year of publication: 2021
Issue Title: COVID19, actividad física y formación del profesorado
Volume: 24
Issue: 3
Pages: 149-165
Type: Article
More publications in: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado
Abstract
The studies that relate the use of teaching models and student´s achievement in reading are characterized by their recent and disparate nature. This research analyzed both the influence and relationship between methodological usage made by 13119 Spanish teachers and the achievement of Spanish students in PISA reading 2018. To this end, a descriptive-correlational research design was implemented in which the results of Spanish students obtained in PISA reading test are related to the results obtained after UMEPE questionnaire administration to the teachers of those students. The results showed significant relationships and a positive and linear influence between the use of active models by teachers and students’ achievement in reading. On the contrary, when a traditional model is implemented, there is no influence or relationship between the variables. The eclectic application of both models can generate more or less students´ achievement in reading depending on the context. These findings taker precedence over most of the connected literature and rank alongside studies that associate active methods and strategies with higher achievement.
Bibliographic References
- Alderete, M. V., Di Meglio, G., & Formichella, M. M. (2017). Acceso a las TIC y rendimiento educativo: ¿una relación potenciada por su uso? Un análisis para España. Revista de Educación, 377, 54–81. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-377-353
- Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Teaching practices and social capital. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.3.189
- Álvarez-Morán, S., Carleos, C.E., Corral, N.O., & Prieto, E. (2018). Metodología docente y rendimiento en PISA 2015: Análisis crítico. Revista de Educación, 379, 85-114. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-379-370
- Amiama-Espaillat, C., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2017). Lectura digital en la competencia lectora: La influencia en la Generación Z de la República Dominicana. Comunicar, 52(25), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C52-2017-10
- Amiama-Espaillat, C., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2018). Explorando la relación entre fluidez lectora y competencia lectora en Educación Secundaria. Ocnos, 17(1), 21-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2018.17.1.1278
- Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32, 2281-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
- Brevik, L. M., & Hellekjær, G. O. (2018). Outliers: Upper secondary school students who read better in the L2 than in L1. International Journal of Educational Research, 89(November 2017), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.001
- Calderón, A., Arias-Estero, J.L., Meroño, L., & Méndez-Giménez, A. (2018). Diseño y Validación del Cuestionario de Percepción del Profesorado de Educación Primaria sobre la Inclusión de las Competencias Básicas. Estudios sobre Educación, 34, 67–97. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.34.67-97
- Colás, M. P., Buendía, L., & Hernández, F. (2009). Competencias científicas para la realización de una tesis doctoral. Barcelona: Davinci.
- Comi, S. L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2017). Is it the way they use it? Teachers, ICT and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 56, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.11.007
- Dong, X., & Hu, J. (2019). An Exploration of Impact Factors Influencing Students’ Reading Literacy in Singapore with Machine Learning Approaches. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p52
- Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157(May), 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
- Fernández-Martín, E. (2020). Análisis de estrategias metodológicas docentes apoyadas en el uso de las TIC para fomentar el aprendizaje cooperativo del alumnado universitario en el Grado de Pedagogía. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 95(34.2), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v34i2.77628
- Gaitán, J. A., & Piñuel, J. L. (1998). Técnicas de investigación en comunicación social. Elaboración y registro de datos. Madrid: Síntesis.
- Gamazo, A., Martínez-Abad, F., Olmos-Miguelañez S., & Rodríguez-Conde M. J. (2018). Evaluación de los factores relacionados con la eficacia escolar en PISA. Un análisis multinivel. Revista de Educación, 379, 56-84. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-379-369
- Gil, M., Cordero, J. M., & Cristóbal, V. (2018). Las estrategias docentes y los resultados en PISA 2015. Revista de Educación, 379, 32-55. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-379-368
- Gil-Flores, J., & García-Gómez, S. (2017). Importancia de la actuación docente frente a la política educativa regional en la explicación del rendimiento en PISA. Revista de Educación, 378, 52-77. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-378-361
- Giménez, G., Barrado, B., & Arias, R. (2019). El papel del profesorado y el entorno de aprendizaje en el rendimiento de los estudiantes costarricenses: Un análisis a partir de PISA. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 30(4), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.60189
- Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M., & Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0
- Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785384
- Huang, J., Tang, Y., He, W., & Li, Q. (2019). Singapore’s School Excellence Model and student learning: evidence from PISA 2012 and TALIS 2013. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1575185
- Jiménez-Hernández, D., González, J. J., & Tornel, M. (2020). Metodologías activas en la universidad y su relación con los enfoques de enseñanza. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 24(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8173
- Lau, K., & Ho, E.S (2016). Reading Performance and Self-regulated Learning of Hong Kong Students: What We Learnt from PISA 2009. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 25, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0246-1
- Lorenzo, F. (2016). Communicative language competence: strategies for reading literacy advance in PISA scores. Revista de Educacion, 374, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2016-374-329
- Martínez-Oviedo, I., Toledo-Toledo, G. & Martínez-Mendoza, E. (2021). Desarrollo de un videojuego y su tablero de baile, para el aprendizaje de matemáticas básicas. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 24(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.403451
- MEFP (2020a). Educabase. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/39JIqtG
- MEFP (2020b). Registro estatal de centros docentes no universitarios. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2WMMiFW
- Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.006
- Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., Croteau, K., & Parkman, S. (2020). Relationship between personality type and preferred teaching methods for undergraduate college students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.690
- O’Connell, M. (2019). Is the impact of SES on educational performance overestimated? Evidence from the PISA survey. Intelligence, 75, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.04.005.
- OCDE (2019a). PISA 2018. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los estudiantes. Informe Español. OCDE Publishing. https://bit.ly/2HPp9tE
- OCDE (2019b). PISA 2018. Technical report. OCDE Publishing. https://bit.ly/2HPszws
- OCDE (2020). PISA 2018. Resultados de lectura en España. OCDE Publishing. https://bit.ly/2BJ3P9P
- Perera, L. D. H., & Asadullah, M. N. (2019). Mind the gap: What explains Malaysia’s underperformance in Pisa? International Journal of Educational Development, 65(November 2017), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.08.010
- Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Hortigüela, D. (2020). ¿Y si toda la innovación educativa en Educación Física no es positiva? Reflexiones y consideraciones prácticas. Retos, 37, 579-587. https://bit.ly/2SpaE6u
- Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived quality of educational technology matters a secondary analysis of students’ ICT use, ICT-related attitudes, and PISA 2012 test scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54, 1070–1091. https ://doi.org/10.1177/07356 33116 64937 3.
- Rodríguez-García, A., & Arias-Gago, A.R. (2019). Uso de metodologías activas. Un estudio comparativo entre profesores y maestros. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(6), 5098-5111. https://bit.ly/2Zkuykk
- Rodríguez-García, A., & Arias-Gago, A.R. (2020). Revisión de propuestas metodológicas: Una taxonomía de agrupación categórica. Alteridad, 15(2), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v15n2.2020.01
- Rogiers, A., Van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2020). The profile of the skilled reader: An investigation into the role of reading enjoyment and student characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 99(November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101512
- Ruiz-Marín, H. (2020). ¿Cómo aprendemos? Una aproximación científica al aprendizaje y a la enseñanza. Barcelona: Graó
- Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C. & Valdivieso-León, L. (2020). Relación entre rendimiento académico y desarrollo de Estrategias de autorregulación en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(3), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.385491
- Sälzer, C., & Roczen, N. (2018). International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning Assessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 10(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.10.1.02
- Sánchez-Fuentes, S., Martín-Almaraz, R.A., Moreno-Medina, I. & Espada-Chavarría, R. (2018). Revisión sobre la intervención precoz en dificultades de aprendizaje relacionadas con la lectura. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 21(3), 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.21.3.335171
- Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and nonacademic track students. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12027
- Tavsancil, E., Yildirim, O., & Bilican, S. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on pisa 2009 reading performance. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(82), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.9
- Torrpa, M., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., Niemi, P., & Ahonen, T. (2017). Why do boys and girls perform differently on PISA reading in Finland? The effects of reading fluency, achievement behaviour, leisure reading and homework activity. Journal of research in reading, 41(1), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12103
- Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
- Van Hek, M., Kraaykamp, G., & Pelzer, B. (2018). Do schools affect girls’ and boys’ reading performance differently? A multilevel study on the gendered effects of school resources and school practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1382540
- Vázquez-Cano, E., De-la-Calle-Cabrera, A. M., Hervás-Gómez, C., & López-Meneses, E. (2020). El contexto sociofamiliar y su incidencia en el rendimiento lector del estudiante en PISA. Ocnos, 19(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2020.19.1.2122
- Vázquez-Cano, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Infante-Moro, A., & López-Meneses, E. (2020). Incidence of a non-sustainability use of technology on students’ reading performance in Pisa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020749
- Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
- Zasacka, Z., & Bulkowski, K. (2017). Reading engagement and school achievement of lower secondary school students. Edukacja, 141(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.24131/3724.170205