Calidad de vida del receptor de un órgano sólido en Castilla y León

  1. VERÓNICA VALLE BARRIO 1
  2. CARLOS FERNÁNDEZ RENEDO 2
  3. ELENA GONZÁLEZ PALACIOS 2
  4. MARÍA LUISA DEL RÍO GONZÁLEZ 2
  5. PILAR MARQUÉS SÁNCHEZ 3
  6. JOSÉ IGNACIO RODRÍGUEZ BARBOSA 2
  1. 1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León.
  2. 2 Laboratorio de Inmunología de Trasplante, Área de Inmunología, Institutos Universitarios de Investigación, Universidad de León, León.
  3. 3 Grupo de Investigación SALBIS, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, León.
Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista ROL de enfermería

ISSN: 0210-5020

Année de publication: 2021

Volumen: 44

Número: 5

Pages: 12-20

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBULERIA editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista ROL de enfermería

Résumé

BACKGROUND: Despite Spain’s leading status in the area of organ transplantation, there is a dearth of studies aimed at measuring the quality of life of patients receiving organ transplants in this country. The nursing profession is an excellent position to implement programmes directed at improving quality of life. The main aim of this study was to determine the quality of life of patients after receiving solid organ transplants in Castile and Leon region and monitor how this has evolved overtime. METHOD: Descriptive retrospective study in which the quality of life was assessed by means of an ad-hoc questionnaire, based on the SF-36 model. The data from each patient was collected after telephone survey that took place in 2015 and 2017-2018. The study population were all solid organ transplant patients in Castile and Leon between 2013 and 2014 and in 2016. RESULTS: Transplantation improved patient’s general quality of life but did not lead to complete recovery. Immunosuppression based on drug therapy with Tacrolimus, used alone or in combination with other drugs, was the therapy of choice in solid organ transplantation in Castile and Leon region. CONCLUSIONS: The stability of outcomes over time suggests that, in the short term, strategies being implemented both in the clinical practice and by the transplant administration service have no immediate beneficial consequences on the overall quality of life of patients.

Références bibliographiques

  • Matesanz R, Marazuela R, Domínguez-Gil B, Coll E, Mahillo B, de la Rosa G. The 40 Donors Per Million Population Plan: An Action Plan for Improvement of Organ Donation and Transplantation in Spain. Transplantation Proceedings 2009, 41, 3453–3456, doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.011.
  • Elizalde J, Lorente M. Coordinación y donación. 2006, 29, 35–44.
  • Matesanz R, Miranda B. A decade of continuous improvement in cadaveric organ donation: The Spanish model. 2002, 15, 22–28.
  • Pablos C, Lopez D. El sistema español de trasplantes: un sistema de excelencia. Interciencia 2012, 37, 333–339.
  • Shepherd L, O ’Carroll R.E, Ferguson E. An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Medicine 2014, 12, 131, doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4.
  • Martı́nez J.M, López J.S, Martı́n A, Martı́n M.J, Scandroglio B, Martı́n, J.M. Organ donation and family decision-making within the Spanish donation system. Social Science & Medicine 2001, 53, 405–421, doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00345-2.
  • Burra P, Germani G, Gnoato F, Lazzaro S, Russo F.P, Cillo U, Senzolo M. Adherence in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transplantation 2011, 17, 760–770, doi:10.1002/lt.22294.
  • Cleemput I, Dobbels F. Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. PharmacoEconomics 2007, 25, 269–286, doi:10.2165/00019053-200725040-00002.
  • O’reilly F, Traywick C, Pennie michelle l, Foster jovonne k, Chensuephy c. Baseline Quality of Life and Anxiety in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study. Dermatologic Surgery 2006, 32, 1480–1485, doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32356.x.
  • Keown P. Improving quality of life–the new target for transplantation. Transplantation 2001, 72, S67-74.
  • Ortega T, Deulofeu R, Salamero P, Roman A, Masnou N, Rubio S, Garcia O, Casanovas T, Cofán F, Twose J et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After a Solid Organ Transplantation (Kidney, Liver, and Lung) of Four Catalonia Hospitals. Transplantation Proceedings 2009, 41, 2265–2267, doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.175.
  • Cobo-Cuenca A.I, Serrano-Selva J.P, de la Marta-Florencio M, Esteban-Fuertes M, Vírseda-Chamorro M, Martín-Espinosa N.M, Sampietro-Crespo A. Calidad de vida del varón con lesión medular traumática y disfunción sexual. Enfermeria Clinica 2012, 22, 205–208, doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.05.002.
  • González Palacios E. Encuesta de satisfacción desde el punto de vista del receptor de un trasplante de órgano sólido vascularizado. Trabajo fin de máster, Universidad de León, 2015.
  • Mendonça A.E.O. de, Torres G. de V, Salvetti M. de G, Alchieri J.C, Costa I.K.F. Mudanças na qualidade de vida após transplante renal e fatores relacionados. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 2014, 27, 287–292, doi:10.1590/1982-0194201400048.
  • Alkatheri A, Al Bekairy A, Aburuz S, Qandil A, Khalidi N, Abdullah K, Al Sayyari S, Bustami R, Al Harbi S, Al Raddadi S et al. Exploring quality of life among renal and liver transplant recipients. Annals of Saudi Medicine 2015, 35, 368–376, doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2015.368.
  • Pérez-San-Gregorio M.Á, Martín-Rodríguez A, Borda-Mas M, Avargues-Navarro M.L, Pérez-Bernal J, Conrad R, Gómez-Bravo M.Á. Post-traumatic growth and its relationship to quality of life up to 9 years after liver transplantation: a cross-sectional study in Spain. 2017, 7, e017455, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017455.
  • Esposito P, Furini F, Rampino T, Gregorini M, Petrucci L, Klersy C,Dal Canton A, Dalla Toffola E. Assessment of physical performance and quality of life in kidney-transplanted patients: a cross-sectional study. Clinical Kidney Journal 2017, 10, 124–130, doi:10.1093/ckj/sfw102.
  • Ortiz F, Aronen P, Koskinen P.K, Malmström R.K, Finne P, Honkanen E.O, Sintonen H, Roine R.P. Health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation: who benefits the most? Transplant International 2014, 27, 1143–1151, doi:10.1111/tri.12394.
  • Daga D, Fernández C, Segura F, Carballo M. Indicaciones y resultados a largo plazo de los trasplantes de órganos sólidos. Calidad de vida en pacientes trasplantados. Med Intensiva 2008, 32, 296–303.
  • Chisholm M.A. Issues of Adherence to Immunosuppressant Therapy After Solid-Organ Transplantation. Drugs 2002, 62, 567–575, doi:10.2165/00003495-200262040-00002.
  • Pasquale C. D, Veroux M, Fornaro M, Sinagra N, Basile G, Gozzo C, Santini R, Costa A, Pistorio M.L. Psychological perspective of medication adherence in transplantation. World Journal of Transplantation 2016, 6, 736, doi:10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.736.
  • Zhu X, Zheng J, Liu K, You L. Rationing of Nursing Care and Its Relationship with Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes: The Mediation Effect Tested by Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16, 1672, doi:10.3390/ijerph16101672.
  • Sánchez-Gómez M, Ramos-Santana S, Gómez-Salgado J, Sánchez-Nicolás F, Moreno-Garriga C, Duarte-Clíments G. Benefits of Advanced Practice Nursing for Its Expansion in the Spanish Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16, 680, doi:10.3390/ijerph16050680.
  • Cuellar–Rodríguez J, Sierra–Madero J.G. Infecciones en pacientes sometidos a trasplante de órgano sólido. Revista de investigación clínica 2005, 57, 368–380.
  • Mongea E, Fernández-Querob L, Naviac J. Complicaciones médicas postoperatorias precoces del trasplante hepático ortotópico en adultos. Revista Española Anestesiología y Reanimación 2002, 49, 529–540.
  • Martín P, Errasti P. Trasplante renal. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra 2006, 29, 79–91.
La source de données: Dialnet