Vocabulary depth and its contribution to text quality in the early years of primary school

  1. Alonso-Cortés-Fradejas, Maria Dolores 1
  2. López-Aguado, Mercedes 1
  3. Llamazares-Prieto, M. Teresa 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702,  1578-4126

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: A multidimensional perspective on written language development / Una perspectiva multidimensional del desarrollo del lenguaje escrito

Volumen: 44

Número: 1

Páginas: 82-116

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2020.1848087 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

El propósito de este estudio es analizar cómo evoluciona la profundidad de vocabulario durante los primeros cursos de Educación Primaria y comprobar qué efecto tiene en la calidad de los textos producidos por el alumnado. Participaron 332 estudiantes españoles, de 1º a 4º de Educación Primaria, que llevaron a cabo una tarea de sinónimos/antónimos, para evaluar la profundidad del vocabulario, y varias tareas de escritura de textos descriptivos para evaluar la calidad del texto. La profundidad de vocabulario se analizó con un sistema de cuatro dimensiones creado ad hoc: cambio de lexema, ajuste al sentido del significado solicitado, preservación de la categoría sintáctica y grado de convencionalidad. Como indicadores de la calidad textual se eligieron la productividad, el índice de subordinación y la estructura textual. Los resultados revelaron que tanto la profundidad del vocabulario como la calidad de los textos producidos mejoraron significativamente con el nivel escolar. Se encontró también que este tipo de conocimiento léxico contribuye significativamente a la calidad textual de los textos evaluados. Se comentan las posibles implicaciones didácticas de estos hallazgos.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbott, R. D. , Berninger, V. W. , & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology , 102(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Alexander Pan, B. , & Uccelli, P. (2010). Desarrollo semántico: El aprendizaje del significado de las palabras. In J.Berko Gleason, & N.Bernstein Ratner (Eds.), Desarrollo del lenguaje (7 ed., pp. 109–141). Pearson Educación. [Google Scholar]
  • Babayiğit, S. , & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing , 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Babayiğit, S. , & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology , 103(1), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021671 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Beers, S. F. , & Nagy, W. E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing , 24(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Berman, R. , & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Cognitive and linguistic factors in evaluating text quality: Global versus local. In V.Evans, & S.Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–440). John Benjamins. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Breetvelt, I. , Van den Bergh, H. , & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction , 12(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1202_2 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 11(2), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Castillo, C. , & Tolchinsky, L. (2018). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and semantic orthographic fluency to text quality through elementary school in Catalan. Reading and Writing , 31(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9786-5 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, E. V. (1995). The lexicon in acquisition (Vol. 65). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cunningham, A. E. , & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology , 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez-Vera, G. , Sotomayor, C. , Bedwell, P. , Domínguez, A. M. , & Jéldrez, E. (2016). Analysis of lexical quality and its relation to writing quality for 4th grade, primary school students in Chile. Reading and Writing , 29(7), 1317–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9637-9 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written in three grade levels. Research report no. 3 . National Council of Teachers of English. [Google Scholar]
  • Kent, S. C. , & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research , 86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kieffer, M. J. , & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing , 25(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Laufer, B. , & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language , 22(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Llaurado, A. , Martí, M. A. , & Tolchinsky, L. (2012). Corpus CesCa: Compiling a corpus of written Catalan produced by school children. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 17(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.06lla [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Malvern, D. , Richards, B. , Chipere, N. , & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development . Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Nagy, W. E. , & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  • Olinghouse, N. G. , & Leaird, J. T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second-and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing , 22(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Olinghouse, N. G. , & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing , 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ordóñez, C. L. , Carlo, M. S. , Snow, C. E. , & McLaughlin, B. (2002). Depth and breadth of vocabulary in two languages: Which vocabulary skills transfer? Journal of Educational Psychology , 94(4), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.719 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ouellette, G. , & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing , 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology , 98(3), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Salas, N. , Llauradó, A. , Castillo, C. , Taulé, M. , & Martí, M. A. (2016). Linguistic correlates of text quality from childhood to adulthood. In J.Perera, M.Aparici, E.Rosado, & N.Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (pp. 307–326). Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Salas, N. , & Tolchinsky, L. (2017). Hunting for the links between word-level writing skills and text quality. In E. Segers & P. van den Broek, (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 103–118). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning , 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz, M. , & Katzir, T. (2012). Depth of lexical knowledge among bilingual children: The impact of schooling. Reading and Writing , 25(8), 1947–1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9308-9 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Sénéchal, M. , Ouellette, G. , & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman, S. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). The Guildford Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Tolchinsky, L. (2015). Continuidades y discontinuidades en el aprendizaje de la lengua escrita. In J.Mata, M. P.Núñez, & J.Rienda (Coords), Didáctica de la lengua y la literatura (pp. 131–146). Pirámide. [Google Scholar]
  • Tolchinsky, L. (2019). Evolving structure of descriptive texts and learners’ abilities. Journal of Literacy Research , 51, 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19858354 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Verhallen, M. , & Schoonen, R. (1998). Lexical knowledge in L1 and L2 of Third and Fifth Graders. Applied Linguistics , 19(4), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.452 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Verheyden, L. , Van den Branden, K. , Rijlaarsdam, G. , Van den Bergh, H. , & De Maeyer, S. (2010). Written narrations by 8-to 10-year-old Turkish pupils in Flemish primary education: A follow-up of seven text features. Journal of Research in Reading , 33(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01430.x [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner, R. K. , Puranik, C. S. , Foorman, B. , Foster, E. , Wilson, L. G. , Tschinkel, E. , & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing , 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet