How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers?an international, multi-disciplinary study

  1. David Nicholas
  2. Hamid R. Hamali
  3. Eti Herman
  4. Jie Xu
  5. Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri
  6. Anthony Watkinson
  7. Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo
  8. Abdullah Abrizah
  9. Marzena Świgon
  10. Tatiana Polezhaeva
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Framing (Encuadre)

Volumen: 29

Número: 6

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2020.NOV.14 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

This study explores early career researchers’ (ECRs) appreciation and utilisation of open access (OA) publishing. The evidence reported here results from a questionnaire-based international survey with 1600 participants, which forms the second leg and final year of a four year long, mixed methods, longitudinal study that sought to discover whether ECRs will be the harbingers of change when it comes to scholarly communications. Proceeding from the notion that today’s neophyte researchers, believed to hold millennial values of openness to change, transparency and sharing, may be best placed to power the take-up of OA publishing, the study sought to discover: the extent to which ECRs publish OA papers; the main reasons for their doing or not doing so; and what were thought to be the broader advantages and disadvantages of OA publishing. The survey data is presented against a backdrop of the literature-based evidence on the subject, with the interview stage data providing contextualisation and qualitative depth. The findings show that the majority of ECRs published in OA journals and this varied by discipline and country. Most importantly, there were more advantages and fewer disadvantages to OA publishing, which may be indicative of problems to do with cost and availability, rather than reputational factors. Among the many reasons cited for publishing OA the most important one is societal, although OA is seen as especially benefiting ECRs in career progression. Cost is plainly considered the main downside.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abrizah, Abdullah; Xu, Jie; Nicholas, David (2017). “Scholarly communication and matters of trust and authority: A comparative analysis of Malaysian and Chinese researchers”. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, v. 22, n. 3, pp. 69-91. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol22no3.5
  • Adie, Euan (2014). Attention! A study of open access vs non-open access articles. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690.v1
  • Allen, Christopher; Mehler, David M. A. (2019). “Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond”. Plos biology, v. 17, n. 5, e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
  • Atchison, Amy; Bull, Jonathan (2015). “Will open access get me cited? An analysis of the efficacy of open access publishing in political science”. PS: Political science & politics, v. 48, n. 1, pp. 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001668
  • Becher, Tony; Trowler, Paul R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, 2nd ed. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education; Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335206278
  • Benavent-Pérez, María; Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian (2012). «The different flavors of research collaboration: A case study of their influence on university excellence in four world regions”. Scientometrics, v. 93, n. 1, pp. 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0638-4
  • Björk, Bo-Christer (2017). “Gold, green, and black open access”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096
  • Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC medicine, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-73
  • Blankstein, Melissa; Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine (2019). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2018. Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SR-Report-US-Faculty-Survey-2018-04122019.pdf
  • Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís (2016). “Faculty information behavior in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries”. New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp. 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
  • Bozeman, Barry; Fay, Daniel; Slade, Catherine P. (2013). “Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art”. The journal of technology transfer, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
  • Brechelmacher, Angelika; Park, Elke; Ates, Gülay; Campbell, David F. J. (2015). “The rocky road to tenure – career paths in academia”. In: Fumasoli, T.; Goastellec, G.; Kehm, B. M. (eds.). Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives. Cham: Springer, pp. 13-40. ISBN: 978 3 319 10720 2
  • Brock, Jon (2018). ‘Bronze’ open access supersedes green and gold. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/bronze-open-access-supersedes-green-and-gold
  • Budd, John M. (1989). “Research in the two cultures: the nature of scholarship in science and the humanities”. Collection management, v. 11, n. 3-4, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v11n03_01
  • Bukvova, Helena (2010). Studying research collaboration: A literature review. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems, v. 10, n. 3. https://bit.ly/32Zsz7W
  • Burstein, David D. (2013). Fast future: How the millennial generation is shaping our world. Boston: Beacon Press, 240 pp. ISBN: 978 0 807044704
  • CNRS (2016). Open science in a digital republic. Paris, France: CNRS. ISBN: 978 2 821868700 https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.1635
  • Coonin, Bryna (2011). “Open access publishing in business research: The authors’ perspective”. Journal of business & finance librarianship, v. 16, n. 3, pp. 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2011.581606
  • Coonin, Bryna; Younce, Leigh M. (2010). “Publishing in open access education journals: The authors’ perspectives”. Behavioral & social sciences librarian, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639261003742181
  • Creaser, Claire (2010). “Open access to research outputs - institutional policies and researchers’ views: results from two complementary surveys”. New review of academic librarianship, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614530903162854
  • Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje; Darby, Robert; Goerner, Bettina; Hyppoelae, Jenni; Igo-Kemenes, Peter; Kahn, Deborah; Lambert, Simon; Lengenfelder, Anja; Leonard, Chris; Mele, Salvatore; Nowicka, Malgorzata; Polydoratou, Panayiota; Ross, David; Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Schimmer, Ralf; Swaisland, Mark; Van-der-Stelt, Wim (2011). “Open access journals – what publishers offer, what researchers want”. Information services & use, v. 31, n. 1-2, pp. 85-91. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2011-0624
  • Dalton, Elizabeth D.; Tenopir, Carol; Björk, Bo-Christer (2020). “Attitudes of North American academics toward open access scholarly journals”. Portal: Libraries and the academy, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 73-100. https://preprint.press.jhu.edu/portal/sites/ajm/files/20.1dalton.pdf
  • Davis, Philip M. (2011). “Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing”. The Faseb journal, v. 25, n. 7, pp. 2129-2134. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-183988
  • Davis, Philip M.; Walters, William H. (2011). “The impact of free access to the scientific literature: A review of recent research”. Journal of the medical library association, v. 99, n. 3, pp. 208-217. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.008
  • De-Silva, Pali U. K.; Vance, Candace K. (2017). “On the road to unrestricted access to scientific information: The open access movement”. In: Scientific scholarly communication: The changing landscape. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 25-40. ISBN: 978 3 319 50626 5 http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_3
  • Didegah, Fereshteh; Thelwall, Mike; Gazni, Ali (2012). “An international comparison of journal publishing and citing behaviours”. Journal of informetrics, v. 6, n. 4, pp. 516-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.003
  • Enago Academy (2017). An introduction to open access publishing. https://www.enago.com/academy/an-introduction-to-open-access-publishing
  • Eschert, Jens (2015). “Young researchers demand open access. Interview with Ralf Schimmer and Ulrich Pöschl on new developments”. MaxPlanckResearch: The science magazine of the Max Planck Society, n. 4, pp. 81-82. https://www.mpg.de/9789059/s005-max-planck-community-080-082.pdf
  • Farnham, Andrea; Kurz, Christoph; Öztürk, Mehmet-Ali; Solbiati, Monica; Myllyntaus, Oona; Meekes, Jordy; Pham, Tra-My; Paz, Clara; Langiewicz, Magda; Andrews, Sophie; Kanninen, Liisa et al. (2017). “Early career researchers want open science”. Genome biology, v. 18, article n. 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7
  • Fowler, Kristine K. (2011). Mathematicians’ views on current publishing issues: A survey of researchers. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/109309/Fowler_mathscholcomm_survey_article.pdf
  • Frass, Will; Cross, Jo; Gardner, Victoria (2014). Open access survey: Exploring the views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge authors. On behalf of Taylor & Francis Group. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/explore/open-access-survey-june2014.pdf
  • Freeman, Richard B., Ganguli, Ina; Murciano-Goroff, Raviv (2014). Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration (Working paper n. w19819). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19819.pdf
  • Friesenhahn, Irene; Beaudry, Catherine (2014). The global state of young scientists. Project report and recommendations. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. http://www.interacademies.org/24897/The-Global-State-of-Young-Scientists-Project-Report-and-Recommendations-
  • Frisch, Nora K.; Nathan, Romil; Ahmed, Yasin K.; Shidham, Vinod B. (2014). “Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - A five year (2007-2011) experience”. CytoJournal, v. 11, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.131739
  • Gaulé, Patrick; Maystre, Nicolas (2011). “Getting cited: Does open access help?”. Research policy, v. 40, n. 10, pp. 1332-1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025
  • Glover, Natasha M.; Antoniadi, Ioanna; George, Gavin M.; Götzenberger, Lars; Gutzat, Ruben; Koorem, Kadri; Liancourt, Pierre; Rutowicz, Kinga; Saharan, Krishna; You, Wanhui; Mayer, Philipp (2016). “A pragmatic approach to getting published: 35 tips for early career researchers”. Frontiers in plant science, v. 7, 610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00610
  • Gould, Julie (2015). Six myths about open access were addressed in an open research workshop at the 2015 Naturejobs career expo in London. [Web log post]. Naturejobs blog, 20 October. http://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2015/10/20/open-research-open-up-to-open-access
  • Graham, Helen; Hill, Katie; Matthews, Peter; O’Brien, Dave; Taylor, Mark (2014). Connecting epistemologies: Methods and early career researchers in the connected communities programme, October. https://earlycareerresearchers.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/connecting-epistemologies-report.pdf
  • Haddow, Gaby; Hammarfelt, Björn (2019). “Quality, impact, and quantification: Indicators and metrics use by social scientists”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 70, n. 1, pp. 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24097
  • Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia-Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah; Lawrence, Shannon; King, C. Judson (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Center for Studies in Higher Education. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g
  • Hsieh, David (2013). Organization and role of international collaboration in research production. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona. http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/281178/1/Hsieh,+David.pdf
  • Hurrell, Christie; Meijer-Kline, Karen (2011). “Open access up for review: academic attitudes towards open access publishing in relation to tenure and promotion”. Open excess, The journal of scholarly communicators, v. 1, n. 2. https://tsc.library.ubc.ca/index.php/journal4/article/view/104
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Herman, Eti; Swingon, Marzana (2020a). “Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David, Herman, Eti; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Świgoń, Marzena; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Watkinson, Anthony (2020b). “National comparisons of early career researchers’ scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 4, pp. 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/LEAP.1313
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David, Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Levine, Kenneth; Allard, Suzie; Christian, Lisa; Volentine, Rachel; Boehm, Reid; Nichols, Frances (2014). “How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences”. Library and information science research, v. 36, n. 3-4, pp. 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.002
  • Johnson, Rob; Watkinson, Anthony; Mabe, Michael (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, 5th ed. Hague, Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf
  • Joseph, Heather (2013). “The open access movement grows up: taking stock of the revolution”. Plos biology, v. 11, n. 10, e1001686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001686
  • Kling, Rob; McKim, Geoffrey (2000). “Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication”. Journal of the American society for information science, v. 51, n. 14, pp. 1306-1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Koler-Povh, Teja; Južnič, Primož; Turk, Goran (2014). “Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering”. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 2, pp. 1033-1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1101-x
  • Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Tsou, Andrew (2015). “Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 7, pp. 1323-1332. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.23266
  • Leahey, Erin (2016). “From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration”. Annual review of sociology, v. 42, pp. 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219
  • Lewis, David W. (2012). “The inevitability of open access”. College & research libraries, v. 73, n. 5, pp. 493-506.
  • https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-299
  • Mabe, Michael; Mulligan, Adrian (2011). “What journal authors want: Ten years of results from Elsevier’s author feedback programme”. New review of information networking, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 71-89. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13614576.2011.574495
  • Mann, Florian; Von-Walter, Benedikt; Hess, Thomas; Wigand, Rolf-Theobald (2009). “Open access publishing in science”. Communications of the ACM, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467279
  • McCabe, Mark J.; Snyder, Christopher M. (2014). “Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals”. Economic inquiry, v. 52, n. 4, pp. 1284-1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12064
  • McKiernan, Erin C.; Bourne, Philip E.; Brown, C. Titus; Buck, Stuart; Kenall, Amye; Lin, Jennifer; McDougall, Damon; Nosek, Brian A.; Ram, Karthik; Soderberg, Courtney K.; Spies, Jeffrey R.; Thaney, Kaitlin; Updegrove, Andrew; Woo, Kara H.; Yarkoni, Tal (2016). “How open science helps researchers succeed”. Elife, 5, e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800
  • Meadows, Arthur-Jack (1974). Communication in science. London: Butterworths. ISBN: 978 0 408705721
  • Méndez, Eva; Lawrence, Rebecca; MacCallum, Catriona J.; Moar, Eva et al. (2020). Progress on open science: towards a shared research knowledge system. Final report of the Open Science Policy Platform. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/00139
  • Mischo, William H.; Schlembach, Mary C. (2011). “Open access issues and engineering faculty attitudes and practices”. Journal of library administration, v. 51, n. 5-6, pp. 432-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589349
  • Moksness, Lars; Olsen, Svein-Ottar (2017). “Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 6, pp. 1149-1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2017-0019
  • Morris, Sally; Thorn, Sue (2009). “Learned society members and open access”. Learned publishing, v. 22, n. 3, pp. 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1087/2009308
  • Müller, Ruth (2014a). “Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs”. Forum: Qualitative social research. Sozialforschung, September 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.3.2245
  • Müller, Ruth (2014b). “Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the contemporary university: A case study of changes in the cultural norms of science”. Minerva, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9257-y
  • Mulligan, Adrian; Mabe, Michael (2011). “The effect of the internet on research motivations, behavior and attitudes”. Journal of documentation, v. 67, n. 2, pp. 290-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111109485
  • Nariani, Rajiv; Fernández, Leila (2012). “Open access publishing: What authors want”. College & research libraries, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 182-195. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-203
  • Nicholas, David, Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Abrizah, Abdullah; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie, Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Świgoń, Marzena (2020a). “Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study”. Research evaluation, v. 29, n. 3, pp. 263-274. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/reseval/rvaa004
  • Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Świgoń, Marzena; Polezhaeva, Tatiana (2020b). “A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
  • Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015). “Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish”. International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 46-53. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2015.5.2.045
  • Nicholas, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017). “Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Clark, David; Herman, Eti (2019). “So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1232
  • Nicholas, David, Watkinson, Anthony; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth; Tenopir, Carol; Herman, Eti (2014). “Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study”. Learned publishing, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140206
  • Niles, Meredith T.; Schimanski, Lesley A.; McKiernan, Erin C.; Alperin, Juan-Pablo (2020). “Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations”. Plos one, v. 15, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
  • Norman, Geoff (2010). “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics”. Advances in health sciences education, v. 15, n. 5, pp. 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  • NPG - Nature Publishing Group (2015). Author insights - Initial findings. https://figshare.com/articles/Author_Insights_2015_survey/1425362
  • Ocholla, Dennis N.; Ocholla, Lyudimila (2016). “Does open access prevent plagiarism in higher education?”. African journal of library, archives and information science, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 189-202. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/167416
  • Ojala, Marydee; Reynolds, Regina; Johnson, Kay G. (2020). “Predatory journal challenges and responses”. The serials librarian, v. 78, n. 1-4, pp. 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2020.1722894
  • Peekhaus, Wilhelm; Proferes, Nicholas (2016). “An examination of North American Library and Information Studies faculty perceptions of and experience with open-access scholarly publishing”. Library & information science research, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.003
  • Pew Research Center (2010a). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change
  • Pew Research Center (2010b). Millennials will make online sharing in networks a lifelong habit. https://www.pewinternet.org/2010/07/09/millennials-will-make-online-sharing-in-networks-a-lifelong-habit
  • Pew Research Center (2018). Social media use continues to rise in developing countries, but plateaus across developed ones. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/social-media-use-continues-to-rise-in-developing-countries-but-plateaus-across-developed-ones
  • PhD on Track (2017). Open access. https://www.phdontrack.net/open-science/open-access-publishing
  • Pinfield, Stephen (2015). “Making open access work: the ‘state-of-the-art’ in providing open access to scholarly literature”. Online information review, v. 39, n. 5, pp. 604-636. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167
  • Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Larivière, Vincent; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Matthias, Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin; Haustein, Stefanie (2018). “The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles”. PeerJ, v. 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
  • Pontika, Nancy (2015). “Open access: what’s in it for me as an early career researcher?”. Journal of science communication, v. 14, n. 4, article C04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14040304
  • Rodríguez, Julia E. (2014). “Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences”. The journal of academic librarianship, v. 40, n. 6, pp. 604-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David (2020). “Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 5, e290503. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.03
  • Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, David; Huntington, Paul (2004). “Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want?”. Learned publishing, v. 17, n. 4, pp. 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1087/0953151042321680
  • Rowley, Jennifer; Johnson, Frances; Sbaffi, Laura; Frass, Will; Devine, Elaine (2017). “Academics’ behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 5, pp. 1201-1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23710
  • Rowley, Jennifer; Sbaffi, Laura; Sugden, Martin; Gilbert, Anna (2020). “Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions”. Journal of information science (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520958591
  • Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2017). “Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes, and practices towards open access publishing”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 4, pp. 722-734. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.16
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2015). “Scholarly societies and scholarly communication: A look ahead”. College & research libraries, v. 76, n. 3, pp. 406-410. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.3.406
  • Schroter, Sara; Tite, Leanne; Smith, Richard (2005). “Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors”. British medical journal (BMJ), v. 330, 756. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82
  • Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martín-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutiérrez, Juan-José (2018). “Attitudes toward open access, open peer review, and altmetrics among contributors to Spanish scholarly journals”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 50, n. 1, pp. 48-70. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.1.08
  • Severin, Anna; Egger, Matthias; Eve, Martin-Paul; Hürlimann, Daniel (2018). “Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review”. F1000Research, 7, 1925. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17328.1
  • Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willett, Peter (2017). “Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082
  • Suber, Peter (2012). Open access. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf
  • Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan (2004). “Authors and open access publishing”. Learned publishing, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104323159649
  • Tennant, Jonathan P.; Crane, Harry; Crick, Tom; Davila, Jacinto; Enkhbayar, Asura; Havemann, Johanna; Kramer, Bianca; Martin, Ryan; Masuzzo, Paola; Nobes, Andy; Rice, Kurt; Rivera-López, Bárbara et al. (2019). “Ten hot topics around scholarly publishing”. Publications, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034
  • Tennant, Jonathan P.; Waldner, François; Jacques, Damien C.; Masuzzo, Paola; Collister, Lauren B.; Hartgerink, Chris H. (2016). “The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review”. F1000Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
  • Tenopir, Carol; Dalton, Elizabeth; Christian, Lisa; Jones, Misty; McCabe, Mark; Smith, MacKenzie; Fish, Allison (2017). “Imagining a gold open access future: attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship”. College & research libraries, v. 78, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
  • Tenopir, Carol; Dalton, Elizabeth; Fish, Allison; Christian, Lisa; Jones, Misty; Smith, MacKenzie (2016a). “What motivates authors of scholarly articles? The importance of journal attributes and potential audience on publication choice”. Publications, v. 4, n. 3, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030022
  • Tenopir, Carol; Levine, Kenneth; Allard, Suzie; Christian, Lisa; Volentine, Rachel; Boehm, Reid; Nichols, Frances; Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony (2016b). “Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 10, pp. 2344-2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23598
  • Van-Rijnsoever, Frank J.; Hessels, Laurens K. (2011). “Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration”. Research policy, v. 40, n. 3, pp. 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
  • Walsh, John P.; Bayma, Todd (1996). “Computer networks and scientific work”. Social studies of science, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 661-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026003006
  • Wang, Xianwen; Liu, Chen; Mao, Wenli; Fang, Zhichao (2015). “The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention”. Scientometrics, v. 103, n. 2, pp. 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
  • Ware, Mark; Mabe, Michael (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9
  • Ware, Mark (2015). What do author insights tell us? [Web log post]. Nature.com blogs, 12 August. http://blogs.nature.com/ofschemesandmemes/2015/08/13/what-do-author-insights-tell-us
  • Watkinson, Anthony; Nicholas, David; Thornley, Clare; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth; Tenopir, Carol (2016). “Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis”. Information processing & management, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.002
  • Watson, Carol A.; Donovan, James M.; Osborne, Caroline (2015). “The open access advantage for American law reviews”. 3A Edison L. & Tech. 1. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/989
  • Wiley (2013). What authors want from open access publishing: Wiley author survey, 2012. https://www.slideshare.net/WileyScienceNewsroom/wiley-14895586
  • Wireless World Research Forum (2017). Millennial users in a 5g context. White paper. Sørensen, L. T.; Williams, I.; Khajuria, S.; Skouby, K. E. (eds.). http://www.wwrf.ch/files/wwrf/content/files/publications/outlook/Outlook18.pdf
  • Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016). UK Survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/uk-survey-of-academics-2015
  • Wuchty, Stefan; Jones, Benjamin F.; Uzzi, Brian (2007). “The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge”. Science, v. 316, n. 5827, pp. 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
  • Xia, Jingfeng (2010). “A longitudinal study of scholars’ attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 3, pp. 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21283
  • Xia, Jingfeng; Harmon, Jennifer L.; Connolly, Kevin G.; Donnelly, Ryan M.; Anderson, Mary R.; Howard, Heather A. (2015). “Who publishes in “predatory” journals?”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 7, pp. 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
  • Xu, Jie; Yang, Tao; Cong, Ting; Zeng, Yuanxiang (2015). “Use of social networking sites among Chinese and American researchers: a comparative study”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 47, n. 1, pp. 60-76. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.1.03
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet