Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progresocomportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles

  1. Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo 1
  2. David Nicholas
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Pluralismo informativo

Volumen: 29

Número: 5

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2020.SEP.03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

Se analizan los hábitos y prácticas de comunicación científica de la nueva ola de investigadores españoles a partir de los resultados de una encuesta de ámbito internacional (2019). Los resultados de un centenar de contribuciones confirman los obtenidos previamente en entrevistas realizadas entre 2016 y 2018 en España en el marco del Proyecto Harbingers, y ponen de manifiesto similitudes y diferencias con los resultados obtenidos de la encuesta mencionada en otros países cubiertos por el Proyecto en su segunda fase. Los investigadores españoles presentan dos caras contradictorias: Son innovadores en sus percepciones aunque no tanto en sus prácticas relativas al acceso abierto y al uso de las redes sociales. Sin embargo, sus actitudes y hábitos nuevos no son desinteresados, están motivados por promocionar el trabajo propio y conseguir el reconocimiento. En este sentido, se muestran conservadores. La competición en que se encuentran inmersos para conseguir un trabajo estable y, por tanto, la necesidad de focalizarse en los méritos que les van a ser evaluados les limita para poder disfrutar del proceso de aprendizaje y dedicarse a las prácticas de ciencia abierta a las que su generación se muestra proclive de forma natural.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Becher, Toby (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bristol: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Blankstein, Melissa; Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine (2019). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2018. Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SR-Report-US-Faculty-Survey-2018-04122019.pdf
  • Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís (2016). “Faculty information behavior in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries”. New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp. 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
  • Conrad, Lettie Y. (2017). “Headlines from the discovery files: Key publications on scholarly content discoverability”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1080
  • Corkery, Chris; Mitchell, Jeremy; Walker, Valerie; Annan, Rob; Goel, Nirupa; Harvey, Louise; Kent, Dave G.; Peters, Julie; Vilches, Silvia L. (2013). The 2013 Canadian postdoc survey: Painting a picture of Canadian postdoctoral scholars. Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars and Mitacs. https://www.mitacs.ca/en/newsroom/publication/2013-canadian-postdoc-survey-painting-picture-canadian-postdoctoral-scholars
  • Friesenhahn, Irene; Beaudry, Catherine (2014). The global state of young scientists. Project report and recommendations. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. http://www.interacademies.org/24897/The-Global-State-of-Young-Scientists-Project-Report-and-Recommendations-
  • Gardner, Tracy; Inger, Simon (2018). How readers discover content in scholarly publications. Trends in reader behavior from 2005 to 2018. Fernhill: Renew Training. https://renewconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/How-Readers-Discover-Content-2018-Published-180903.pdf
  • Graham, Helen; Hill, Katie; Matthews, Peter; O’Brien, Dave; Taylor, Mark (2014). Connecting epistemologies: Methods and early career researchers in the connected communities programme, October. https://earlycareerresearchers.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/connecting-epistemologies-report.pdf
  • Herman, Eti; Nicholas, David (2019). “Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: An activity-specific approach. Review article”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 1, e280102. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti (2015). “Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms”. Research evaluation, v. 24, n. 1, pp. 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv032
  • Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Herman, Eti; Świgoń, Marzena (2020). “Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
  • Laudel, Grit; Gläser, Jochen (2008). “From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers”. Higher education, v. 55, n. 3, pp. 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
  • Merga, Margaret; Mason, Shannon (2020). “Sharing research with academia and beyond: Insights from early career researchers in Australia and Japan”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1296
  • Müller, Ruth (2014a). “Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs”. Forum: Qualitative social research. Sozialforschung, September 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.3.2245
  • Müller, Ruth (2014b). “Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the contemporary university: A case study of changes in the cultural norms of science”. Minerva, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9257-y
  • National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; and Institute of Medicine (2014). The postdoctoral experience revisited. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18982/the-postdoctoral-experience-revisited
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Świgoń, Marzena; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti (2019a). “Open science from the standpoint of the new wave of researchers: view from the scholarly frontline. Information services & use, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 369-374. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-190069
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Herman, Eti; Świgoń, Marzena (2017a). “Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Świgoń, Marzena (2019b). “Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 2, pp. 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1206
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stephanie (2015a). “New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Watkinson, Anthony; Świgoń, Marzena; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca (2018). “Early career researchers’ quest for reputation in the digital age”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 4, pp. 375-396. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01
  • Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Swigon, Marzena; Polezhaeva, Tatiana (2020a). “A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
  • Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015b). “Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish”. International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 46-53. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2015.5.2.045
  • Nicholas, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017b). “Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Świgon, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2020b). “Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1284
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Clark, David; Herman, Eti (2019c). “So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?”. Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1232
  • Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2017c). “Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1098
  • Perruso, Carol (2016). “Undergraduates’ use of Google vs. library resources: a four-year cohort study”. College & research libraries, v. 77, n. 5, pp. 614-630. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.614
  • Powell, Kendall (2015). “The future of the postdoc”. Nature, v. 520, n. 7546, p. 144-147. https://www.nature.com/news/the-future-of-the-postdoc-1.17253
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David (2019). “Reputación y comunicación científica: investigadores españoles en el inicio de su carrera”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 2, e280203. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.03
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Simões, Maria-da-Graça; Vieira-de-Freitas, Maria-Cristina; Frías, José-Antonio (2017). “Descubrimiento de información científica: ¿todavía misión y visión de la biblioteca académica?”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 464-479. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.13
  • Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2017). “Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes, and practices towards open access publishing”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 4, pp. 722-734. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.16
  • Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martín-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutiérrez, Juan-José (2018). “Attitudes toward open access, open peer review, and altmetrics among contributors to Spanish scholarly journals”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 50, n. 1, pp. 48-70. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.1.08
  • Spezi, Valéry (2016). “Is information-seeking behaviour of doctoral students changing? A review of the literature (2010-2015)”. New review of academic librarianship, v. 22, n. 1, pp. 78-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831
  • Xu, Jie; He, Chen; Su, Jing; Zeng, Yuanxiang; Wang, Zixian; Fang, Fei; Tang, Wenhui (2020). “Chinese researchers’ perceptions and use of open access journals: Results of an online questionnaire survey”. Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1291
  • Xu, Jie; Nicholas, David; Zeng, Yuanxiang; Su, Jing; Watkinson, Anthony (2018). “Chinese early-career researchers’ scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours: Changes observed in year two of a longitudinal study”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.3.03
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet