El modelo de respuesta a la intervención en escrituraRevisión de medidas de evaluación y prácticas instruccionales

Referencias bibliográficas

• Altarac, M., & Saroha, E. (2007). Lifetime prevalence of learning disability among US children. Pediatrics, 119(1), 77– 83. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2089L
• Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., & Fidalgo, R. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000089
• Arias-Gundín, O., & García, J. N. (2007). Eficacia de la instrucción en los aspectos mecánicos y/o semánticos de la revisión textual. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 33(147), 5–29.
• Armengol, L. (2007). Los protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta como instrumento para analizar el proceso de escritura. RESLA, 20, 27–35.
• Arrimada, M., Torrance, M., & Fidalgo, R. (2018). Effects of teaching planning strategies to first-grade writers. Brit i sh Journal o f Educat ional Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12251
• Association American Psychiatric, A. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.
• Balu, R., Zhu, P., Doolittle, F., Schiller, E., Jenkins, J., & Gersten, R. (2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
• Burns, M.K., Appleton, J.J. & Stehouwer, J.D (2005). Metaanalytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381394. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300406
• Berninger, V. (2001). Process Assessment of the Learner (PAL) test battery for reading and writing. San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.
• Berninger, V., & Winn, W. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York: Guildford Press.
• Campos i Alemani, F. (1995). El rol del psicólogo de la educación. Papeles de Psicólogo, 63. http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/resumen?pii=690
• Castro-Villarreal, F., Rodriguez, B. J., & Moore, S. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions and attitudes about Response to Intervention (RTI) in their schools: A qualitative analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.004
• Coker, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2010). Curriculum-Based measurement of writing in kindergarten and first grade: An investigation of production and qualitative score s . Excep t iona l Ch i ld ren , 76 (2 ) , 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600203
• Cordewener, K. A., Verhoeven, L., & Bosman, A. M. T. (2016). Improving spelling performance and spelling consciousness. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 48– 74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963213
• Costa, L. J. C., Hooper, S. R., McBee, M., Anderson, K. L., & Yerby, D. C. (2012). The use of curriculum-based measures in young at-risk writers: Measuring change over time and potential moderators of change. Exceptionality, 20(4), 199– 217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.724623
• Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200303
• Dockrell, J. E., Connelly, V., Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2015). Assessing children’s writing products: The role of curriculum based measures. British Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3162
• Dunsmuir, S., Kyriacou, M., Batuwitage, S., Hinson, E., Ingram, V., & O’Sullivan, S. (2015). An evaluation of the Writing Assessment Measure (WAM) for children’s nar ra t i ve wr i t ing. Assess ing Wri t ing, 23, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.001
• Espin, C. A., De La Paz, S., Scierka, B. J., & Roelofs, L. (2005). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050380040201
• Espin, C., Wallace, T., Campbell, H., Lembke, E. S., Long, J. D., & Ticha, R. (2008). Curriculum-based measurement in writing: predicting the success of high school students on state standard tests. Exceptional Children, 74(2), Pages 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400203
• Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written composition. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing: processing capacity and working memory effects in text production (pp. 15–23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Farrell, P. (2009). El papel en desarrollo de los psicológos escolares y educativos en el apoyo a niños, escuelas y familiares. Papeles del Psicológo, 30(1), 74-85.
• Fidalgo, R., & Robledo, P. (2010). El ámbito de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje en España a partir de la Ley Orgánica de Educación. Papeles de Psicólogo, 31(2), 171– 182.
• Fidalgo, R., & Torrance, M. (2018). Developing writing skills through cognitive self-regulation instruction. In R. Fidalgo, K. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Desig principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 89–118). Leiden: Brill Editions.
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Arias-Gundín, O., & MartínezCocó, B. (2014). Comparison of reading-writing patterns and performance of students with and without reading di f f icu l t ies . Ps icothema, 26(4), 442–8. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.23
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., & García, J. N. (2008). The long-term effects of strategy-focussed writing instruction for grade six students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 672– 693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.09.001
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & Álvarez, M.L. (2015). Strategy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a model benefits 6th grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.004
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., & Robledo, P. (2011). Comparación de dos programas de instrucción estratégica y autoregulada para la mejora de la competencia escrita. Psicothema, 23, 672 680.
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 31(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.
• Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Slider, N. J., Hoffpauir, L. D., Whitmarsh, E. L., & Naquin, G. M. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10166
• Gil, V., & Jiménez, J. E. (2019). Modelo de respuesta a la intervención y escritura. In J. E. Jimenéz (Ed.), Modelo de respuesta a la intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje (pp. 203–248). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Spring, 22(2), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511268
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2018). Evidence-Based Writing Practices: a Meta-Analysis of existing meta-analysis. In R. Fidalgo, K. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 13–37). Leiden: Brill Editions.
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Adkins, M. (2018). The impact of supplemental handwriting and spelling instruction with first grade students who do not acquire transcription skills as rapidly as peers: A randomized control trial. Reading and Writing, 31(6), 1273–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-0189822-0
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & McKeown, D. (2014). The writing of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies and future directions. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (second, pp. 405–438). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educa t iona l P sycho logy , 99 (3 ) , 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396– 407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
• Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703– 1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
• Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 7–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01761831
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (2016). Farewell to holistic scoring. Part Two: Why build a house with only one brick? Assessing Writing, 29, A1–A5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.006
• Hampton, D. D., & Lembke, E. S. (2016). Examining the technical adequacy of progress monitoring using early writing curriculumbased measures. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 336– 352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.973984
• Harris, K., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
• Harris, K, Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Driscoll, S. A., Sandmel, K., Brindle, M., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategies development in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111429005
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
• Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hoy, M. M., Egan, M. Y., & Feder, K. P. (2011). A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3
• Jewell, J., & Malecki, C. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34(1), 27–44.
• Jiménez, J.E. (2019). Modelo de respuesta a la intervención: Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje. Madrid: Pirámide
• Jiménez, J. E., Guzmán, R., Rodríguez, C., & Artiles, C. (2009). Prevalencia de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: La dislexia en español. Anales de Psicología, 25(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.2.211101
• Jimerson, S., Burns, M., & Vanderheyden, A. M. (2015). The handbook of response to intervention. Boston, MA: Springer.
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
• Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr2015.07.02.2
• Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa. Boletín Oficial del Estado, nº 295 de 10 de diciembre de 2013.
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031391
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Tailoring multicomponent writing interventions: Effects of coupling self-regulation and transcription training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417708170
• Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Connelly, V. (2017). Examining the transcription-writing link: effects of handwriting fluency and spelling accuracy on writing performance via planning and translating in middle grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.004
• Limpo, T., Parente, N., & Alves, R. A. (2018). Promoting handwriting fluency in fifth graders with slow handwriting: A single-subject design study. Reading and Writing, 31(6), 1343–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-0179814-5
• Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. (pp. 33–77). Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
• López, P., Torrance, M., & Fidalgo, R. (2019). The online management of writing processes and their contribution to text quality in upper-primary students. Psicothema, 31(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.326
• López, P., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Fidalgo, R. (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-primary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054
• Mcmaster, K. L., & Campbell, H. (2008). New and existing curriculum-based writing measures: Technical features within and across grades. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 550–566.
• McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020301
• McMaster, K. L., Du, X., Yeo, S., Deno, S. L., Parker, D., & Ellis, T. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185– 206. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700203
• Mcmaster, K. L., Xiaoqing, D., & Pétursdóttir, A.-L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 41– 60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326212
• Mogasale, V. V., Patil, V. D., Patil, N. M., & Mogasale, V. (2012). Prevalence of specific learning disabilities among primary school children in a south Indian city. Ind ian Journa l o f Pedia t r ics , 79(3) , 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-011-0553-3
• Mushinski, B., & Stormont-Spurgin, M. (1995). Spelling interventions for students with disabilities: A review. The Journal of Special Education, 28(4), 488–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699502800407
• O’Connor, R. E., Sanchez, V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Responsiveness to intervention and multi-tiered systems of support for reducing reading difficulties and identifying learning disability. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallaham, & P. Cullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 189–202). New York: Routledge.
• Olive, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2009). Cognitive processes in writing during pause and execution periods. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 758–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802079850
• Paz, S., Swanson, P. N., & Graham, S. (1998). The contribution of executive control to the revising by students with writing and learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 448–460.
• Pierce, B. (1991). TOEFL Test of Written English (TWE) scor ing guide. TESOL Quarter ly, 25(1), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587035
• Ritchey, K. D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9063-0
• Ritchey, K. D., & Coker, D. L. (2014). Identifying writing difficulties in first grade: An investigation of writing and reading measures, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12030
• Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879
• Romig, J., Therrien, W., & Lloyd, J. (2016). Meta-analysis of criterion validity for curriculum-based measurement in written language. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916670637
• Saddler, B., & Asaro-Saddler, K. (2013). Response to intervention in writing: A suggested framework for screening, intervention, and progress monitoring. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.741945
• Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psycho logy Rev iew, 28(2 ) , 225 -265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9335-1
• Spandel, V. (2008). Creating writer through 6-trait writing assessment and instruction. Colombus, Ohio: Pearson.
• Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & Robledo, P. (2015). Do sixth-grade writers need process strategies? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12065
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E. A., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A.-H. (2006). A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390060501
• Wilcox, K. A., Murakami-Ramalho, E., & Urick, A. (2013). Justin-time pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives on the response to intervention framework. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679817.2011.01494.x
• Williams, K. J., Walker, M. A., Vaughn, S., & Wanzek, J. (2017). A synthesis of reading and spelling interventions and their effects on spelling outcomes for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415619753
• Wolf, B., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. (2017). Effective beginning handwriting instruction: Multi-modal, consistent format for 2 years, and linked to spelling and composing. Reading and Writ ing, 30(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4
• Zhou, Q., Dufrene, B. A., Mercer, S. H., Olmi, D. J., & Tingstom, D. H. (2019). Parent-implemented reading interventions within a response to intervention framework. Psychology in the Schools, 56(7), 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22251