Las constituciones de los Estados federados; en particular las de los Estados norteamericanos

Referencias bibliográficas

• «Developments in the Law: The Interpretation of State Constitutional Rights», Vol. 95, n.º 6 Harvard Law Review, abril 1982, pp. 1324-1502;
• Benjamin, G., «Constitutional amendment and revisión», Tarr, A., State constitutions for the twenty first century, op. cit, pp. 178-179.
• Bidart Campos, G., Tratado elemental de Derecho Constitucional argentino, Buenos Aires, ed. Ediar, 1993;
• Brennan, W., «The Bill of rights and the States: the revival of state constitutions as guardians of individual rights», 61 New York University Law Review 535 (1986), p. 535.
• Brennan, W.J., «State constitutions and the protection of individual rights», Harvard Law Review, n.º 98, 1977
• Briffault, R., «State and local finance», Tarr, G.A., State Constitutions for the twenty-first century. The Agenda of State Constitutional Reform, op. cit., pp. 215-216.
• Cámara Villar, G., Por una reforma federal del Estado autonómico. Sevilla, Fundación Alfonso Perales, 2012
• Carrillo, D. (et. al.), «California constitutional law: direct democracy», Southern California Law Review, vol. 92, 2019, p. 607.
• Citrin, J., «Proposition 13 and the transformation of California Government», California Journal of Politics and Policy, Vol. 1 [2009], Iss. 1, Art. 16, pp. 1-9.
• CURRIE, P., «Positive and Negative Constitutional Rights», University of Chicago Law Review 53 (1986), p. 864.
• Da Cunha Ferraz, A.C., O poder constituinte dos Estados membros, Revista dos Tribunais, 1979; Ferrari, S., Constituição estadual e federação, Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris, 2003;
• Dinan, J., «The earth belongs always to the living generation: the development of state constitutional amendment and revisión procedures», The Review of Politics, Vol. 62, n.º 4, Fall 2000, pp. 645-674.
• Duchacek, I: Comparative federalism: the territorial dimensión of politics. Philadelphia, University Press of America, 1987, p. 191.
• Elazar, D. J., Exploring federalism, Tuscaloosa, 1987, pp. 166-167.
• Elazar, D.J., «The principles and traditions underlying state constitutions», Publius: the Journal of Federalism, 12, Winter 1982, p. 12.
• Erk, J. y Anderson, L., «The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions?» Regional & Federal Studies, 2009, 19:2, 191-202.
• Frías, P., Las nuevas constituciones provinciales, Buenos Aires, Editorial Depalma, 1989.
• Friedelbaum, S. H., Human rights in the states, Santa Barbara, Praeger, 1988.
• Friedman, L., A history of American Law, 2.ª ed., Nueva York, Simon & Schuster, 1985, p. 120.
• Fritz, C., «The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary observation on State Constitution-Making in the Nineteenth-Century war», Rutgers Law Journal, n.º 25,1994, pp. 945-998.
• Furnish, D. B., «Las fuentes del derecho en Estados Unidos. La muerte del derecho consuetudinario, las fuentes escritas en la edad del derecho positivo y el papel y efecto de los Restatements of the Law», LI Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2001, p. 77.
• Gamper, A., «A global theory of federalism: the nature and challenges of a federal State», German Law Journal, Vol 6, n.º 10, 2005, pp. 1297-1318
• Gonçalves Couto, C., «Imitação ou coerção? Constituições estaduais e centralização federativa no Brasil», Revista de administração pública, 52(2) 2018:321-344.
• Graves, G.B., «Fourth Edition of the Model State Constitution», American Political Science Review, Vol. 35, Issue 5, October 1941, pp. 916-919.
• Hammon, C.W., «State constitutional reform: Is it necessary?», Albany Law Review, vol. 64, 2011, p. 1327.
• Kahn, H., «Federalism and non territorial minorities in India», Tarr, A., Williams, R.F., y Marko, J., Federalism, subnational constitucions and minority rights, London, Praeger, 2004, p. 201.
• Kemp, R.L., «California’s Proposition 13: A One-Year Assessment», State & Local Government Review, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Jan., 1982), pp. 44-47.
• Kincaid, J., «Early State history and constitutions», Haider-Markel, D.P, The Oxford Handbook of State and local government, London, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 244-262.
• Libonati, M. E., «The legislative branch», Tarr, G.A., State Constitutions for the twenty-first century. The Agenda of State Constitutional Reform, op. cit., pp. 37-65.
• Lutz, D. S., «Toward a theory of constitutional amendment», The American Political Sciencie Review, vol. 88, n.º 2, jun. 1994, p. 356.
• Márquez Piñero, R., El sistema jurídico de los Estados Unidos de América, México, Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM, 1994, p. 36. 132
• Marshfield, J.L., «Models of subnational constitutionalism», Penn State Law Review, Vol. 115: 4, p. 1158.
• Martí Capitanachi, L. C., «Las Constituciones locales en el sistema federal mexicano ¿son verdaderas constituciones?», Federalismo y Regionalismo. Memoria del VII Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional, México, UNAM, 2002, p. 658.
• Mchugh, J. T, «The Quebec Constitution,» Quebec Studies, n.º 28, 1999, pp. 3-26.
• Montilla Martos, J.A., Reforma federal y Estatutos de segunda generación como modelo para la reforma federal de la Constitución, Cizur Menor, Aranzadi, 2015, pp. 19-74 11
• Morey, W., «The first State Constitutions», Annals of the American Academy of Politics and Social Science, Vol. 4, sept. 1893.
• Morin, J.J., «Pour una nouvelle constitution du Québec», McGill Law Journal, Vol. 28, n.º 2, p. 173. 22
• Morton, F. L., «Provincial constitutions in Canada», 17 de mayo de 2004. Conferencia en Rutgers Law School. https://statecon.camden.rutgers.edu/sites/statecon/files/subpapers/morton.pdf.
• NATIONAL MUNICIPAL LEAGUE. COMMITTE ON STATE GOVERNMENT, A model State Constitution. New York, National Municipal League, 1924.
• New developments in State Constitutional Law, monográfico de Publius. The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 17., n.º 1, Winter 1987,
• Noriega, J., «Las provincias argentinas en la organización del Estado federal», Rev. In Iure, año 2, Vol I, La Rioja (Argentina), 2012, pp. 1-15;
• Palermo, F., Kössler, C., Comparative federalism: constitutional arrangements and case Law, Bloomsbury, Hart Publishing, 2017, nota. 71.
• Price, P., «Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and Disappearance of Canada´s Provincial Constitutions», Perspectives on Federalism, vol. 9, issue 3, 2017, p. 22.
• Primo, D.M., State Constitutions and Fiscal Policy, Washington, George Mason University, 2016, p. 15.
• Rowe, M. y Collins, J.M., «What is the Constitution of a Province», Dunn, C., Provinces: Canadian Provincial Politics, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2016, pp. 297-314
• Sabsay, D. «El frustrado intento de reforma de la Constitución de la Provincia de Buenos Aires» (http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:Derechopolitico-1991-34-1A0C5521/ PDF).
• Saunders, CH., «Australian State Constitutions», Rutgers Law Journal, n.º 31, 1999. 17 University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia Qld, 1991 (5.ª edición). 18 Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, 2006.
• Seijas Villadangos, M.E., «Crisis, federalidad, cultura federal y federalismo asimétrico: odisea constitucional 2013», Revista General de Derecho Constitucional, n.º. 16, 2013, pp. 9-32;
• Seijas Villadangos, M.E., «Federalismo resiliente: vanguardia y retaguardia de una nueva organización territorial del Estado español», Ruiz-Rico Ruiz, G., Porras Nadales, A., Revenga Sánchez, M., Regeneración democrática y reforma constitucional, Valencia, Tirant, 2017, pp. 305-344.
• Seijas Villadangos, M.E., «Significado de los nuevos derechos en el proceso de eventual federalización del modelo autonómico: El grado de federalidad del Estado español» en Matia Portilla, Francisco Javier, (coord.) Pluralidad de ciudadanías, nuevos derechos y participación democrática, Madrid, CEPC, 2011, pp. 257-283
• Sharman, C., «The Strange Case of a Provincial Constitution: The British Columbia Constitution Act», Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, Vol. 17, No. 1 (1984), pp. 87-108.
• Smith, A., Same-Sex Marriages: Legal Issues, Congressional Research Service 7-5700, p. 18.
• Taché, J.C., Des provinces de l’Amérique du Nord et d’une union fédérale, Québec, Brousseau, 1858, p. 187. Disponible en la Biblioteca Nacional de Quebec (http://bibnum2.banq.qc.ca/bna/numtexte/59062.pdf)
• Tarlton, Ch. D.: Symmetry and asymmetry as elements of federalism: a theoretical speculation. The Journal of Politics 27.4, 1965, p. 874.
• Tarr, A. y Porter, C., «State Constitutionalism and State Constitutional Law», New developments in State Constitutional Law, monográfico de Publius. The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 17., n.º 1, Winter 1987, pp. 1-12
• Tarr, A., «New judicial federalism in perspective», Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 72, Issue 4, 1997, p. 1097.
• Tarr, A., «Subnational constitutions and minority rights: a perspective on Canadian provincial constitutionalism», Rutgers Law Journal, vol. 40, 2008-2009, pp. 767-792.
• TARR, A., Understanding State Constitutions, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
• Tarr, G.A., «Of time, place, and the Alaska Constitution», Alaska Law Review, vol. 35:2, pp. 155177.
• Tarr, G.A., «Subnational constitutions and minority rights», Tarr, A., Williams, R.F., y Marko, J., Federalism, subnational constitucions and minority rights, London, Praeger, 2004, p. 94.
• Tarr, G.A., State Constitutions for the twenty-first century. The Agenda of State Constitutional Reform, Albany, State University of New York Press, 2006, p. 1.
• Taslitz, A., «The fourth amendment in the twenty-first century: technology, privacy, and human emotions», Law and contemporary problems. Enduring and Empowering: The Bill of Rights in the Third Millennium, Volume 65, Number 2 (Spring 2002), p. 161.
• Turp, D., «Une Constitution du Québec», Noreau, P. y Rolland, L., Mélanges Andrée Lajoie: Le droit une variable dependante, Montreal, Les editions Thémis, 2008, p. 136.
• Vasak, K., «La larga lucha por los derechos humanos», El correo de la UNESCO, noviembre 1977, pp. 29-32.
• Watts, R., «Daniel J. Elazar: Comparative Federalism and Post-Statism», Publius Vol. 30, No. 4, Essays in Memory of Daniel J. Elazar (Autumn, 2000), pp. 155-168.
• Weglyn, R.E., «New Jersey constitutional amendments for victims´rights: symbolic victory’», 25 Rutgers L.J. 183 (1993-1994), p. 183.
• Williams, R. F. y Tarr, G. A., «Subnational constitutional space: a view form the states, provinces, regions, länder and cantons», Tarr, A., Williams, R.F., y Marko, J., Federalism, subnational constitucions and minority rights, London, Praeger, 2004, p. 5.
• Williams, R. F., The law of the american state constitutions, op. cit, p. 306 131
• Williams, R., «Alaska, the last statehood constitution, and subnational rights and governance», Alaska Law Review, Vol. 35:2, 2018, p. 141.
• Williams, R., «Rights», Tarr, A., y Williams, R., State Constitutions for the Twenty-first Century. The agenda of State Constitutional Reform. Albany, State University of New York Press, 2006, p. 7.
• Williams, R., «State constitutional limits on legislative procedure: legislative compliance and judicial enforcement», Publius. The Journal of Federalism, n.º 17, 1987, p. 91.
• Williams, R., «Teaching and researching comparative subnational constitutional law», Cuadernos de Federalismo XXVI, Córdoba, Academia Nacional de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, 2013, pp. 143-169.
• Williams, R.F., State Constitutional Law. Cases and materials. Lexis Nexis, Newark, 2006 (4.ª edic.). p. 421.
• Wiseman, N., «Clarifying Provincial constitutions», National Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 6, 1996.
• Woodward-Burns, Robinson, American Reconstitution: How The States Stabilize American Constitutional Development, (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2643., p. 4. https://repository.upenn. edu/edissertations/2643
• Zackin, E., Looking for rights in all the wrong places. Why State Constitutions contain America´s positive rights. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2013.