Culinary and sensory traits diversity in the Spanish Core Collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

  1. Rivera, Ana 1
  2. Casquero, Pedro A. 2
  3. Mayo, Sara 2
  4. Almirall, Antonio 1
  5. Plans, Marçal 1
  6. Simó, Joan 1
  7. Romero-del-Castillo, Roser 1
  8. Casañas, Francesc 1
  1. 1 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola Superior de Agricultura de Barcelona, Dept. d’Enginyeria Agroalimentària i Biotecnologia/ Fundació Miquel Agustí, Campus del Baix Llobregat. Esteve Terrades 8, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona)
  2. 2 University of León, Natural Resources Institute, Dept. of Agrarian Engineering and Sciences, Av. Portugal 41, 24071 León
Aldizkaria:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Argitalpen urtea: 2016

Alea: 14

Zenbakia: 1

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2016141-7726 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Laburpena

The Spanish National Plant Genetic Resource Center’s core collection of bean germplasm includes 202 accessions selected from more than 3000 accessions in function of passport data, seed phenotype, genetic background, and agronomic traits. To acquire more useful information about these accessions, we cultivated and characterized them for sensory and culinary traits. We found considerable variation for culinary and sensory traits of the cooked beans (mean coefficients of variation: 41% for the sensory traits and 40% for the culinary traits). The large dataset enabled us to study correlations between sensory and culinary traits and among these traits and geographic origin, seed color, and growth habit. Greater proportion of white in the seed coat correlated positively with brightness and negatively with mealiness (r=0.60, r=-0.60, p<0.001, respectively). Mealiness correlated negatively with seed-coat roughness and rate of water absorption (r=-0.60, r=-0.53, p<0.001, respectively). Materials of Andean origin had lower seed-coat brightness (p<0.01) and seed-coat roughness, and greater seed-coat perceptibility, mealiness, flavor, and aroma (p<0.001) than materials of Mesoamerican origin. Growth habit failed to correlate with culinary or sensory traits. Breeders can benefit from the information about this core collection available at www.crf.inia.es/crfesp/paginaprincipaljudia.asp.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Abdel Kader ZM, 1995. Study of some factors affecting water absorption by faba beans during soaking. Food Chemistry 53: 235-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)93926-I
  • Asensio C, Asensio S-Manzanera MC, Ibeas A, De la Rosa L, 2010. Resistance to halo blight, common bacterial blight, and bacterial brown spot in Spanish common bean core collection. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 53: 110-111. http://wwwx.inia.es/inventarionacional/referencias/docs/ID214.pdf
  • Berrios JJ, Swanson BG, Chenog A, 1999. Physicochemical characterization of stored black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Res Int 32: 669-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00144-1
  • Bressani R, Elias LG, 1980. The nutritional role of polyphenols in beans. Proc Symp 36th An Meeting Inst Food Technol, St. Louis, MO, USA. June 10-13. pp: 61-68.
  • Campa A, Pérez-Vega E, Pascual A, Ferreira JJ, 2010. Genetic analysis and molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci in common bean against Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 100(12): 1315-1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-10-0161
  • Casañas F, Perez-Vega E, Almirall A, Plans M, Sabate J, Ferreira JJ 2013. Mapping of QTL associated with seed chemical content in a RIL population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 192: 279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0880-8
  • Casquero PA, 2012. Las marcas de calidad en el desarrollo de las leguminosas en España. V Seminario de judía de la Península Ibérica, Asoc Esp Leguminosas, Pontevedra (Spain). pp: 145-150.
  • Casquero PA, Lema M, Santalla M, De Ron AM, 2006. Performance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Spain in the Atlantic and Mediterranean environments. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53: 1021-1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-7794-1
  • Costa C, Antonucci F, Pallottino F, Aguzzi J, Sun DW, Menesatti P, 2011. Shape analysis of agricultural products: a review of recent research advances and potential application to computer vision. Food Bioprocess Tech 4: 673-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0556-0
  • De la Rosa L, Lázaro A, Varela F, 2000. Racionalización de la colección española de Phaseolus vulgaris L. II Seminario de judía de la Península Ibérica, Asoc Esp Leguminosas, Villaviciosa (Spain). pp: 55-62.
  • Del Valle JM, Stanley DW, Bourne MC, 1992. Water absorption and swelling in dry beans seed. J Food Process Pres 16: 75-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.1992.tb00193.x
  • Espinosa-Alonso LG, Lygin A, Widholm JM, Valverde ME, Paredes-Lopez O, 2006. Polyphenols in wild and weedy Mexican common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Agric Food Chem 54: 4436-4444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf060185e
  • Garcia RAV, Rangel PN, Bassinello PZ, Brondani C, Melo LC, Sibov ST, Vianello-Brondani RP, 2011. QTL mapping for the cooking time of common beans. Euphytica 186: 779-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0587-7
  • Gepts P, Bliss FA, 1986. Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Econ Bot 40: 469-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02859660
  • Gepts P, Osborne TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA, 1986. Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): Evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40: 451-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02859659
  • Hacisalihoglu G, Settles AM, 2013. Natural variation in seed composition of 91 common bean genotypes and their possible association with seed coat color. J Plant Nutr 36(5): 772-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.754041
  • Hayat I, Ahmad A, Masud T, Ahmed A, Bashir S, 2014. Nutritional and health perspectives of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54: 580-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.596639
  • ISO 5492, 2008. Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Jahns G, Nielsen H, Paul W, 2001. Measuring image analysis attributes and modelling fuzzy consumer aspects for tomato quality grading. Comput Electron Agr 31: 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00171-X
  • Koenig RL, Singh SP, Gepts P, 1990. Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 44: 50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02861066
  • Lucas B, Griffiths PD, 2004. Evaluation of common bean accessions for resistances to Pythium ultimum. HortScience 39: 1193-1195.
  • Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT, 1999. Sensory evaluation techniques, 3rd. ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439832271
  • Mendiburu F, 2010. Agricolae: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package vers 1.0-9. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae. [4 December 2013].
  • Mulas D, García-Fraile P, Carro L, Ramírez-Bahena MH, Casquero P, Velázquez E, González-Andrés F, 2011. Distribution and efficiency of Rhizobium leguminosarum strains nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris in Northern Spanish soils: Selection of native strains that replace conventional N fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 2283-2293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.018
  • Murdoch D, Chow ED, 2007. Ellipse: Functions for drawing ellipses and ellipse like confidence regions. R package version 0.3-5. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ellipse/index.html. [4 December 2013].
  • Pascual A, Campa A, Pérez-Vega E, Giraldez R, Miklas PN, Ferreira JJ, 2010. Screening common bean for resistance to four Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates collected in Northern Spain. Plant Dis 94: 885-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-7-0885
  • Peleg M, 1988. An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves. J Food Sci 53: 1216-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb13565.x
  • Pérez-Vega E, Campa A, De la Rosa L, Giraldez R, Ferreira JJ, 2006. Evaluation for resistance to anthracnose of a core collection established from the CRF-INIA common bean collection. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 49: 201-202.
  • Pérez-Vega E, Campa A, de la Rosa L, Giraldez R, Ferreira JJ, 2009. Genetic diversity in a core collection established from the main Spanish bean genebank. Crop Sci 49: 1372-1386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0409
  • Plans M, Simó J, Casañas F, Romero-del-Castillo R, Rodriguez-Saona LE, Sabaté J, 2014. Estimating sensory properties of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by near infrared spectroscopy. Food Res Int 56: 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.12.003
  • Posa-Macalincag MC-T, Hosfield GL, Grafton KF, Uebersax MA, Kelly JD, 2002. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of canning quality traits in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Amer Soc Hort Sci 127: 608-615.
  • Puerta-Romero J, 1961. Variedades de judías cultivadas en España. Monogr nº 11. Ministerio de Agricultura, Madrid, Spain.
  • R Development Core Team, 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. [4 December 2013].
  • Rivera A, Fenero D, Almirall A, Ferreira JJ, Simo J, Plans M, Romero-del-Castillo R, Casañas F, 2013. Variability in sensory attributes in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a first survey in the Iberian secondary diversity center. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60: 1885-1898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-9963-6
  • Romero-del-Castillo R, Valero J, Casañas F, Costell E, 2008. Training, validation and maintenance of a panel to evaluate the texture of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Sensory Stud 23: 303-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00157.x
  • Romero-del-Castillo R, Sabaté J, Plans M, Casañas C, 2010. Evaluación para características de calidad. In: Mejora genética y recursos fitogenéticos: nuevos avances en la conservación y utilización de los recursos fitogenéticos; Carrillo JM, Díez MJ, Pérez de la Vega M, Nuez F (eds.). pp: 385-420. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, Spain.
  • Romero-del-Castillo R, Costell E, Plans M, Simó J, Casañas F, 2012. A standardized method of preparing common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for sensory analysis. J Sens Stud 27: 188-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2012.00381.x
  • Santalla M, de Ron AM, Voysest O, 2001. European bean market classes. In: Catalogue of Bean Genetic Resources; Amurrio M, Santalla M, De Ron AM (eds). pp: 79-94. Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza/PHASELIEUFAIR-PL97-3463-MBG-CSIC. Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, et al., 2014. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46: 707-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.3008
  • Sefa-Dedeh S, Stanley DW, 1979. The relationship of microstructure of cowpeas to water absorption and dehulling properties. Cereal Chem 56: 379-386.
  • Singh SP, 1982. A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 25: 92-95.
  • Singh PS, Gepts P, Debouck DG, 1991. Races of common bean (Phaeolus vulgaris, fabaceae). Econ Bot 45: 379-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02887079
  • Stacklies W, Redestig H, Scholz M, Walther D, Selbig J, 2007. PcaMethods a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics 23: 1164-1167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm069
  • Stanley DW, 1992. A possible role for condensed hardening tannins in bean. Food Res Int 25: 187-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0963-9969(92)90136-S
Datuen iturria: Dialnet