In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against "Salmonella enterica" serovar Enteritidis and "Escherichia coli" strains from poultry

  1. Sonia Martínez-Martínez
  2. Sheila Yubero-Delgado
  3. Elías-Fernando Rodríguez-Ferri
  4. Rafael Frandoloso
  5. Álvaro Álvarez-Estrada
  6. César-Bernardo Gutiérrez-Martín
Journal:
Ciencia rural

ISSN: 0103-8478

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 46

Issue: 8

Pages: 1438-1442

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478CR20151288 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ciencia rural

Abstract

The efficacy of 28 individual or blended disinfectants against avian Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains was determined. An in vitro test in the presence and absence of serum as source of organic material was conducted. Povidone-iodine (releasing 1% available iodine), 1% potassium permanganate, 70% ethanol, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and three commercial formulations based on quaternary ammonium compounds + formaldehyde or cresol derivates were the most effective against all strains tested and reduced bacterial counts by more than 106 times (6-log10) regardless of the presence of organic matter. These commercial compounds as well as ethanol and chlorhexidine among the individual substances tested might be helpful in the adoption of environmental control measures against these two enterobacteria in poultry industry. Key words: Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis; Escherichia coli; disinfection; suspension test; poultry industry

Bibliographic References

  • AARESTRUP, F.M., HASMAN, H.. (2004). Susceptibility of different bacterial species isolated from food animals to copper sulphate, zinc chloride and antimicrobial substances used for disinfection.. Veterinary Microbiology. 100. 83
  • EL-NAGGAR, M.Y.M.. (2001). Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial activity of some disinfectants on Escherichia coli serotypes. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 47. 63-73
  • GUTIÉRREZ, C.B.. (1995). Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 56. 1025
  • GUTIÉRREZ MARTÍN, C.B.. (2011). Evaluation of efficacy of several disinfectants against Campylobacter jejuni strains by a suspension test.. Research in Veterinary Science,. 91. 44
  • JOHNSON, T.J.. (2012). Prevalence of avian-pathogenic Escherichia coli strain O1 genomic islands among extraintestinal and commensal E. coli isolates.. Journal of Bacteriology. 194. 2846
  • KASSAIFY, Z.G.. (2007). Preliminary study on the efficacy and safety of eight individual and blended disinfectants against poultry and dairy indicator organisms. Veterinaria Italiana. 43. 821
  • MARIN, C.. (2009). Biofilm development capacity of Salmonella strains isolated in poultry risk factors and their resistance against disinfectants. Poultry Science. 88. 424
  • McLAREN, I.. (2011). Evaluation of commonly-used farm disinfectants in wet and dry models of Salmonella farm contamination.. Avian Pathology. 40. 33-42
  • NASSAR, T.J.. (1997). Decontamination of chicken carcasses artificially contaminated with Salmonella.. Revue Scientifique et Technique. 16. 891
  • RUSSELL, S.M., AXTELL, S.P.. (2005). Monochloramine versus hypchlorite as antimicrobial agents for reducing populations of bacteria on broiler chicken carcasses.. Journal of Food Protection. 68. 758
  • SILVER, S.. (2000). Gram-positive pathogens. ASM. Washington, DC.
  • STRINGFELLOW, K.. (2009). Evaluation of disinfectants commonly used by the commercial poultry industry under simulated field conditions.,. Poultry Science. 88. 1151
Data source: Dialnet