Luchas y pacificación en la historia de la kinesiología americana

  1. J. Rodríguez López 1
  2. Miguel Vicente Pedraz 2
  3. Alfonso Mañas Bastida 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

ISSN: 1577-0354

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 16

Número: 62

Páginas: 257-275

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15366/RIMCAFD2016.62.006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

Resumen

En este artículo estudiamos la disputa epistemológica y pedagógica sobre la kinesiología/educación física que ha tenido lugar en las universidades de Estados Unidos desde 1990 hasta la actualidad. Hemos recogido el pensamiento de una muestra amplia de autores involucrados, con el propósito de obtener una visión de conjunto de un proceso que, de acuerdo con Morrow (2006), trata de esclarecer ¿de dónde venimos?, ¿qué somos?, ¿a dónde vamos? Tras el cotejo y análisis de la documentación más relevante concluimos que el periodo 1990-2013, caracterizado por una enconada pugna de paradigmas –en la que han estado implicados humanistas, positivistas, crosdisciplinaristas y subdisciplinaristas–, ha dado como resultado el dominio del paradigma integrador de Kretchmar (2007, 2008)

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abrahams, A. y Collins, D. (2011). Taking the Next Step: Ways Forward for Coaching Science. Quest 63:4, 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483687
  • Anderson, D.R. (2002). The Humanity of Movement or “It´s Not Just a Gym Class”. Quest 54: 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491768
  • Andrews D. L. (2008). Kinesiology’s Inconvenient Truth and the Physical Cultural Studies Imperative. Quest 60: 45-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483568
  • Bailey, S. (1996) Science in the Service of Physical Education and Sport: the story of the International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education, 1956-1996. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bardy B. G. (2008). A European Perspective on Kinesiology in the 21st Century. Quest 60: 139-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483574
  • Bouchard, C. (1992) The Field of the Physical Activity Sciences, in C. Bouchard, B.D. McPherson, A.W. Taylor (eds.) Physical Activity Sciences. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Charles, J.M. (2005). Changes and Challenges: A 20/20 Vision of 2020. Quest 57: 267-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491857
  • Christina, R.W. (2000). Advancing Engagement in Kinesiology and Physical Education. Quest 52: 315-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491718
  • Clark, J.E. (2008). Kinesiology in the 21st Century: A Preface. Quest 60: 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483563
  • Corbin, Ch. B. (2002) Physical Education As an Agent of Change. Quest 54: 182-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491773
  • Cunningham, G.B. (2002). Removing the Blinders: Toward an Integrative Model of Organizational Change in Sport and Physical Activity. Quest 54: 276-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491779
  • Freeman, W.H. (1992). Physical Education and Sport in a Changing Society. 4thed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Gill, D.L. (2007). Integration: The Key to Sustaining Kinesiology in Higher Education. Quest 59: 270- 286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483552
  • Hatfield, B.D. (2008). E Pluribus Unum—From DNA to Social Systems: Understanding Physical Activity Through an Integrated Perspective. Quest 60: 154-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483575
  • Heinemann, K. (1987). The Future of Sport: A Challenge for Sport Science. International Journal of Physical Education 24: 8-17.
  • Henry, F.M. (1964). Physical Education –An Academic discipline. Journal of Health Physical Education & Recreation 35: 32-33.
  • Hopper, T. F. Madill, L.E. Bratseth, Ch. D., Cameron, K.A., Coble, J. D. and Nimmon, L. E. (2008). Multiple Voices in Health, Sport, Recreation, and Physical Education Research: Revealing Unfamiliar Spaces in a Polyvocal Review of Qualitative Research Genres. Quest 60: 214-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483578
  • Hughson, J. y Tapsell, Ch. (2006). Physical Education and the “Two Cultures” Debate: Lessons from Dr. Leavis. Quest 58: 410-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491891
  • Ivy, J.L. (2007). Exercise Physiology: A Brief History and Recommendations Regarding Content Requirements for the Kinesiology Major. Quest 59: 34-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483534
  • Jable, J.Th. The American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education, 1940-1984: Innovation, Introspection, Identity, and Involvement. Quest 2006: 58: 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491869
  • Johns, D. P. y Tinning, R. (2006). Risk Reduction: Recontextualizing Health As a Physical Education Curriculum. Quest, 58: 395-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491890
  • Kelley, E.J. y Lindsay, C.A. (1976). Knowledge Obsolescence in Physical Educators. The Research Quarterly 48: 463-474.
  • Kovar, S. K. (2004). A Sense of Connection and Direction. Quest 56: 267-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2004.10491826
  • Kretchmar, R.S. (2005). Jigsaw puzzles and river banks: Two ways of picturing our future. Quest 57: 171-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491851
  • Kretchmar, R.S. (2007). What to Do With Meaning? A Research Conundrum for the 21st Century. Quest 59: 373- 383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483559
  • Kretchmar, R.S. (2008). The Utility of Silos and Bunkers in the Evolution of Kinesiology. Quest 60: 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483564
  • Kühn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Larsson, H. y Quennerstedt, M. (2012). Understanding Movement: A Sociocultural Approach to Exploring Moving Humans. Quest 64: 283-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.706884
  • Lawson, H.A. (1990). Beyond Positivism: Research, Practice, and Undergraduate Professional Education. Quest 42: 161-183.
  • Lawson, H.A. (2007). Renewing the Core Curriculum. Quest 59: 219-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483550
  • Lu, Ch., Tito J.M., y Kentel J.A. (2009). Eastern Movement Disciplines (EMDs) and Mindfulness: A New Path to Subjective Knowledge in Western Physical Education. Quest 63: 353-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2009.10483621
  • Lucas J.A. (2006). The Formative Years of the American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education 1930-1938. Quest 58: 2-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491867
  • Lund, J. (2010). Getting on the Right Bus. Quest 62: 311-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2010.10483651
  • McMacullick, B.A. y Lomax, M. (2000). The Boston Normal School of Gymnastics: An Unheralded Legacy. Quest 52: 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491700
  • McKenzie, Th. L. (2007). The Preparation of Physical Educators: A Public Health Perspective. Quest 59: 346- 357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483557
  • Metzler, M. (1994). Scholarship Reconsidered for the Professoriate of 2010. Quest 46: 440-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1994.10484138
  • Metzler, M. (2007). Looking for (and Finding) Modern Day Pioneers in Kinesiology and Physical Education in Higher Education. Quest 59: 288- 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483553
  • Morrow, J.R. Jr. (2006). “Pass It On”– 75 Years of Leadership in Kinesiology and Physical Education: Introduction. Quest 58: 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491866
  • Newell, K.M. (1990a). Physical Education in Higher Education: Chaos Out of Order. Quest 42: 227-242.
  • Newell, K.M. (1990b). Physical Activity, Knowledge Types, and Degree Programs. Quest 42: 243-268.
  • Newell K. M. (2007). Kinesiology: Challenges of Multiple Agendas. Quest 59: 5-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483532
  • Overdorf (2005). Images and influences in the promotion of physical activity. Quest 57: 243–254.
  • Park, R. (1998). Critical Issues for the Future: A House Divided. Quest 50: 213-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484281
  • Pringle, R. (2000). Physical Education, Positivism, and Optimistic Claims From Achievements Goal Theorists. Quest 52: 18-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491698
  • Reeve, T.G. (2007). Kinesiology: Defining the Academic Core of Our Discipline. Quest, 59, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483531
  • Rikli, R.E. (2006), Kinesiology—A “Homeless” Field: Addressing Organization and Leadership Needs. Quest: 58: 287-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491884
  • Rovegno, I. (2008). ‘Learning and Instruction in Social, ‘Cultural Environments: Promising Research Agendas. Quest 60: 84-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483570
  • Schmitz, J.N. (1965). El problema de la ciencia del ejercicio físico y el deporte. Citius, Altius, Fortius 439-470.
  • Siedentop, D. (1990). Commentary: The World According to Newell. Quest 42: 315-322.
  • Snow, C. (1959). The two cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Struna, N.L. (1991). Further Reactions to Newell: Chaos is Wonderful. Quest 43: 230-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1991.10484026
  • Tannehill, D. (2005), Back to the Future: We Listened and We Learned. Quest: 57: 288-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491858
  • Thomas, J.R. (1998). Arizona State University: prominence within the university is essential; prominence within the academic filed is nice. Quest 50: 159-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484273
  • Thomas, J.R. y Reeve, G.T. (2006). A Review and Evaluation of Doctoral Programs 2000-2004 by the American Academy of Kinesiology and Physical Education. Quest 58, 176-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491878
  • Tinning R. (2008). Pedagogy, Sport Pedagogy, and the Field of Kinesiology. Quest 60: 405-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483589
  • Twietmeyer, G. (2012). ‘What is Kinesiology? Historical and Philosophical Insights. Quest 64:4-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.653268
  • Vealey, R.S. (2006). Smocks and Jocks Outside the Box: The Paradigmatic Evolution of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Quest (003362958) 58: 128-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491876
  • Wilde, A., Seifried, Ch. Adelman, M.L. (2010). The Culture of History in Sport Management's Foundation: The Intellectual Influence of Harvard Business School on Four Founding Sport Management Scholars. Quest 62: 406-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2010.10483657
  • Woods, M.L., Karp, G.G., Feltz, D.L. (2003). Positions in Kinesiology and Physical Education at the College or University Level. Quest 55: 30-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2003.10491787
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet