Dynamic analysis of the capital structure in technological firms based on their life cycle stages

  1. Paula Castro 1
  2. María T. Tascón 1
  3. Borja Amor-Tapia 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Any de publicació: 2015

Volum: 44

Número: 4

Pàgines: 458-486

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2015.1088202 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Altres publicacions en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

This article analyses the effect of a firm�s life cycle stages on the capital structure in tech versus non-tech firms using a wide sample of public companies from Europe. An innovative approach based on operating, investing and financing cash flows allows us to analyse differences in leverage and specify the differential role of significant drivers of the capital structure across stages in both sectors. Our results point to the information asymmetry factor posed by the pecking order as the predominant driver behind the differences in the effect of intangible assets and growth opportunities for tech firms in some stages, mainly maturity. Frank and Goyal�s (2003) test of the pecking order theory confirms the lower use of debt by tech firms during all life cycle stages. In addition, we find that the results obtained for tech firms are largely attributable to the behaviour of high-tech firms with the highest growth opportunities.

Informació de finançament

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • I.Adizes, (1999). Managing corporate life cycles. Paramus, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • M.Arellano, (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • M.Arellano,, & O.Bover, (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  • D.B.Audretsch,, & M.P.Feldman, (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253–273. doi:10.1007/BF00157670
  • B.H.Baltagi, (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • A.Berger,, & G.Udell, (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 613–673. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7
  • R.Blundell,, & S.Bond, (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
  • A.Bozkaya,, & B.Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, (2008). Who funds technology-based small firms? Evidence from Belgium. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1–2), 97–122. doi:10.1080/10438590701279466
  • P.Brierley, (2001). The financing of technology-based small firms: A review of the literature. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 41(1), 64–83.
  • W.A.Bruinshoofd,, & L.De Haan, (2011). Is the negative relation between leverage and historical market-to-book specific to US and information and communication technology firms? International Review of Finance, 11(2), 227–243. doi:10.1111/irfi.2011.11.issue-2
  • T.Bulan,, & Z.Yan, (2010). Firm maturity and the pecking order theory. International Journal of Business and Economics, 9(3), 179–200.
  • F.Castellacci, (2007). Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1105–1145. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm033
  • R.E.Caves,, & M.E.Porter, (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241–262. doi:10.2307/1885416
  • A.D.Chandler, (1962). Strategy and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • H.DeAngelo,, L.DeAngelo,, & R.M.Stulz, (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 227–254. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.005
  • V.Dickinson, (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969–1994. doi:10.2308/accr-10130
  • S.Djankov,, C.McLiesh,, & A.Shleifer, (2007). Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 77–99.
  • E.F.Fama,, & K.R.French, (1998). Taxes, financing decisions and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 53(3), 819–843. doi:10.1111/jofi.1998.53.issue-3
  • E.F.Fama,, & K.R.French, (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1–33. doi:10.1093/rfs/15.1.1
  • E.O.Fischer,, R.Heinkel,, & J.Zechner, (1989). Dynamic capital structure choice: Theory and tests. TheJournal of Finance, 44(1), 19–40. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02402.x
  • M.J.Flannery,, & K.P.Rangan, (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(3), 469–506. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.004
  • J.Francis,, & K.Schipper, (1999). Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 319–335. doi:10.2307/2491412
  • M.Z.Frank,, & V.K.Goyal, (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0
  • M.Z.Frank,, & V.K.Goyal, (2008). Trade off and pecking order theories of debt. In B. Espen Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (Vol. 2, pp. 135–202). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • M.Z.Frank,, & V.K.Goyal, (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. doi:10.1111/fima.2009.38.issue-1
  • J.Freear,, & W.E.Wetzel, (1990). Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 77–89. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(90)90001-A
  • A.Frielinghaus,, B.Mostert,, & C.Firer, (2005). Capital structure and the firm’s life stage. South African Journal of Business Management, 36(4), 9–18.
  • V.M.González,, & F.González, (2008). Influence of bank concentration and institutions on capital structure: New international evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 363–375. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.010
  • J.R.Graham,, & M.T.Leary, (2011). A review of empirical capital structure research and directions for the future. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 3, 309–345. doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-102710-144821
  • F.A.Gul, (1999). Growth opportunities, capital structure and dividend policies in Japan. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(2), 141–168. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00003-6
  • N.Halov,, & F.Heider, (2011). Capital structure, risk and asymmetric information. The Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1(4), 767–809. doi:10.1142/S2010139211000171
  • J.Hirsch,, & U.Walz, (2011). Financing decisions along a firm’s life-cycle: Debt as a commitment device. European Financial Management, 17(5), 898–927. doi:10.1111/eufm.2011.17.issue-5
  • T.Hogan,, & E.Hutson, (2005). Capital structure in new technology-based firms: Evidence from the Irish software sector. Global Finance Journal, 15(3), 369–387. doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2004.12.001
  • C.Hsiao, (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • A.Hyytinen,, & M.Pajarinen, (2005). Financing of technology-intensive small businesses: Some evidence on the uniqueness of the ICT sector. Information Economics and Policy, 17(1), 115–132. doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2004.03.005
  • R.K.Kazanjian, (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279. doi:10.2307/256548
  • S.Klepper, (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.
  • S.S.Kwon,, Q.J.Yin,, & J.Han, (2006). The effect of differential accounting conservatism on the “over-valuation” of high-tech firms relative to low-tech firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27(2), 143–173. doi:10.1007/s11156-006-8794-3
  • M.La Rocca,, T.La Rocca,, & A.Cariola, (2011). Capital structure decisions during a firm’s life cycle. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 107–130. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9229-z
  • L.Laeven,, & F.Valencia, (2013). Systemic banking crises database. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 225–270. doi:10.1057/imfer.2013.12
  • M.L.Lemmon,, M.R.Roberts,, & J.F.Zender, (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. TheJournal of Finance, 63(4), 1575–1608. doi:10.1111/jofi.2008.63.issue-4
  • S.Martin,, & J.T.Scott, (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 437–447. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0
  • N.Michaelas,, F.Chittenden,, & P.Poutziouris, (1999). Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: Empirical evidence from company panel data. Small Business Economics, 12(2), 113–130. doi:10.1023/A:1008010724051
  • D.Miller,, & P.H.Friesen, (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161–1183. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  • S.C.Myers, (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
  • S.C.Myers, (1984). The capital structure puzzle. TheJournal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x
  • S.C.Myers, (1993). Still searching for optimal capital structure. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 6(1), 4–14. doi:10.1111/jacf.1993.6.issue-1
  • S.C.Myers,, & N.S.Majluf, (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
  • T.C.Opler,, & S.Titman, (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00086.x
  • A.Ozkan, (2001). Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: Evidence from UK company panel data. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(1–2), 175–198. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00370
  • Ö.Öztekin,, & M.J.Flannery, (2012). Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 88–112. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.014
  • M.Pfaffermayr,, Stöckl, M., & Winner, H. (2013). Capital structure, corporate taxation and firm age. Fiscal Studies, 34(1), 109–135.
  • R.G.Rajan,, & L.Zingales, (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x
  • D.Roodman, (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, 9(1), 86–136.
  • G.Rubio,, & F.Sogorb, (2011). The adjustment to target leverage of Spanish public firms: Macroeconomic conditions and distance from target. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 19(57), 35–63.
  • G.Rubio,, & F.Sogorb, (2012). Adjustment costs and the realization of target leverage of Spanish public firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 41(156), 547–564.
  • L.Shyam-Sunder,, & S.C.Myers, (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), 219–244. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00051-8
  • M.Spence, (1981). The learning curve and competition. TheBell Journal of Economics, 12(1), 49–70. doi:10.2307/3003508
  • G.Teixeira,, & M.J.Coutinho Dos Santos, (2014). Do firms have financing preferences along their life cycle? Evidence from Iberia (Working paper). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=676869.
  • S.Titman,, & R.Wessels, (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
  • I.Welch, (2011). Two common problems in capital structure research: The financial-debt-to-asset ratio and issuing activity versus leverage changes. International Review of Finance, 11(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/irfi.2011.11.issue-1
  • B.Wernerfelt, (1985). The dynamics of prices and market shares over the product life cycle. Management Science, 31(8), 928–939. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.8.928
  • J.M.Wooldridge, (2007). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.