Do local authorities use NPM delivery forms to overcome problems of fiscal stress?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). (1973). City financial emergencies: The intergovernmental dimension. Washington, DC: ACIR.
• Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, H. (1994). Partisan politics, divided governments, and the economy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Andrews, R. (2011). New public management and the search for efficiency. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management, Part V, Chapter XIX (pp. 281-294). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Editorial.
• Ashworth, J., Geys, B., & Heyndels, B. (2005). Government weakness and local public debt development in Flemish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 395-422. doi:10.1007/s10797-005-2317-3
• Audit Commission. (2007). Use of resources. Guidance for councils. London: Audit Commission.
• Balaguer-Coll, M. T. (2001). Análisis de la situación en la administración local. Una Aplicación a los ayuntamientos de la Comunidad Valenciana (Doctoral Thesis). Universidad Jaume I, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Económicas.
• Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2006). Between privatization and inter-municipal cooperation: Small municipalities, scale economies and transaction costs. Urban Public Economics Review, 6, 13-31.
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2007). Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 517-534. doi:10.1080/03003930701417528
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2010). Empirical analysis of solid management waste costs: Some evidence from Galicia, Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(3), 187-193. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.015
• Bel, G., & Warner, M. (2008). Challenging issues in local privatization. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 104-109. doi:10.1068/c2601ed
• Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2008). Política y gestión financiera municipal. Revista de Contabilidad -Spanish Accounting Review, 11(2), 55-78.
• Boyne, G. A. (1996). Scale, performance and the new public management: An empirical analysis of local authority services. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 809-826. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 6486.1996.tb00173.x
• Boyne, G. A. (1998). Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in U. S. local government. Public Administration Review, 58(6), 474-484. doi:10.2307/977575
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441-468. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug030.
• Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2008). Changing modes of service delivery: How past choices structure future choices. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 127-143. doi:10.1068/c0633.
• Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2010). Contracting for complex products. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl. 1), i41-i58. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup034.
• Brudney, J., Fernandez, S., Ryu, J., & Wright, D. (2005). Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 393-419. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui019.
• Brusca, I., Mora, L., & Montesinos, V. (2012). La descentralización de servicios en el sector local: Factores explicativos e implicaciones contables. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad-Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 41(153), 143-162.
• Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). (1997). Indicators of government financial condition. Toronto: CICA.
• Carmeli, A. (2008). The fiscal distress of local governments in Israel: Sources and coping strategies. Administration and Society, 39(8), 984-1007. doi:10.1177/0095399707309358.
• Chiriboga, M. (1994). Descentralización, Municipalización y Desarrollo local: La Experiencia en América Latina. Seminario sobre el desarrollo local en América Latina hacia el siglo XXI, San José, 8-10. June.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2006). The whole of government approach -regulation, performance and public sector reform. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Working Paper 6, UNIFOB, August, Bergen, Norway.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2008). NPM and beyond -structure, culture and demography. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 7-23. doi:10.1177/0020852307085730.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2011). Beyond NPM? Some development features. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management, Part VI, Chapter XXVII (pp. 391-404). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Editorial.
• Christoffersen, H., & Larsen, K. B. (2007). Economies of scale in Danish municipalities: Expenditure effects versus quality effects. Local Government Studies, 33(1), 77-95. doi:10.1080/03003930601081283.
• Clark, T. (1994). Municipal fiscal strain: Indicator and causes. Government Finance Review, 10(3), 27-29.
• Copeland, R. E., & Ingram, R. (1983). Municipal financial reporting and disclosure quality. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic "enlightenment". Public Administration, 87(4), 892-909. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 9299.2009.01766.x
• Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & Melenberg, B. (2003). Contracting out refuse collection. Empirical Economics, 28(3), 553-570. doi:10.1007/s001810200145.
• Dollery, B., Crase, L., & Byrnes, J. (2006). Local government failure: Why does Australian local government experience permanent financial austerity? Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 339-353. doi:10.1080/10361140600848952.
• Douglas, J. W., & Gaddie, R. K. (2002). State rainy day funds and fiscal crises: Rainy day funds and the 1990-1991 recession revisited. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22(1), 19-30. doi:10.1111/ 1540-5850.00063.
• Dubin, J., & Navarro, P. (1988). How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(2), 217-241.
• Dutton, J. E. (1986). The processing of crisis and non-crisis strategic issues. Journal of Management Studies, 23(5), 501-517. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00434.x
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1987). Concepts statement of objectives of financial reporting (Concepts Statement No. 1). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1999). Statement of basic financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for state and local governments (Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 34). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2004). Statement of economic condition reporting; the statistical section -An amendment of NCGA Statement 1 (Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 44). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Greenberg, J., & Hillier, D. (1995). Indicators of financial condition for governments. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research, Paris-Amy, France, No date.
• Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Groves, M., Godsey, W., & Shulman, M. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook of local government (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The International City/County Management Association.
• Guillamón, M. D., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2011). Evaluación de la deuda pública local en España. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 40(150), 251-285. doi:10.1080/02102412.2011.10779703.
• Hagen, T. P., & Vabo, S. I. (2005). Political characteristics, institutional procedures and fiscal performance: Panel data analyses of Norwegian local governments, 1991-1998. European Journal of Political Research, 44(1), 43-64. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00218.x
• Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119-1158. doi:10.1086/261729.
• Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada-United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 144-158. doi:10.1068/c0634.
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289-317. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur006.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2006). The whole of government approach -regulation, performance and public sector reform. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Working Paper 6, UNIFOB, August, Bergen, Norway.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2008). NPM and beyond -structure, culture and demography. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 7-23. doi:10.1177/0020852307085730.
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2011). Beyond NPM? Some development features. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management, Part VI, Chapter XXVII (pp. 391-404). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Editorial.
• Christoffersen, H., & Larsen, K. B. (2007). Economies of scale in Danish municipalities: Expenditure effects versus quality effects. Local Government Studies, 33(1), 77-95. doi:10.1080/03003930601081283.
• Clark, T. (1994). Municipal fiscal strain: Indicator and causes. Government Finance Review, 10(3), 27-29.
• Copeland, R. E., & Ingram, R. (1983). Municipal financial reporting and disclosure quality. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic "enlightenment". Public Administration, 87(4), 892-909. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 9299.2009.01766.x
• Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & Melenberg, B. (2003). Contracting out refuse collection. Empirical Economics, 28(3), 553-570. doi:10.1007/s001810200145.
• Dollery, B., Crase, L., & Byrnes, J. (2006). Local government failure: Why does Australian local government experience permanent financial austerity? Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 339-353. doi:10.1080/10361140600848952.
• Douglas, J. W., & Gaddie, R. K. (2002). State rainy day funds and fiscal crises: Rainy day funds and the 1990-1991 recession revisited. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22(1), 19-30. doi:10.1111/ 1540-5850.00063.
• Dubin, J., & Navarro, P. (1988). How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(2), 217-241.
• Dutton, J. E. (1986). The processing of crisis and non-crisis strategic issues. Journal of Management Studies, 23(5), 501-517. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00434.x
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1987). Concepts statement of objectives of financial reporting (Concepts Statement No. 1). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1999). Statement of basic financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for state and local governments (Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 34). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2004). Statement of economic condition reporting; the statistical section -An amendment of NCGA Statement 1 (Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 44). Norwalk, CT: GASB.
• Greenberg, J., & Hillier, D. (1995). Indicators of financial condition for governments. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research, Paris-Amy, France, No date.
• Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Groves, M., Godsey, W., & Shulman, M. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook of local government (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The International City/County Management Association.
• Guillamón, M. D., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2011). Evaluación de la deuda pública local en España. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 40(150), 251-285. doi:10.1080/02102412.2011.10779703.
• Hagen, T. P., & Vabo, S. I. (2005). Political characteristics, institutional procedures and fiscal performance: Panel data analyses of Norwegian local governments, 1991-1998. European Journal of Political Research, 44(1), 43-64. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00218.x
• Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119-1158. doi:10.1086/261729.
• Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada-United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 144-158. doi:10.1068/c0634.
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289-317. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur006.
• Ribot, J. (2001, July). Local actors, powers and accountability in African decentralizations: A review of issues. International Development Research Centre of Canada Assessment of Social Policy Reforms Initiative, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva.
• Rodrigues, M., Tavares, A. F., & Araújo, J. F. (2012). Municipal service delivery: The role of transaction costs in the choice between alternative governance mechanisms. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 615-638. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.666211.
• Rubin, I., & Stein, L. (1990). Budget reform in St. Louis: Why does budgeting change? Public Administration Review, 50(4), 420-426.
• Sappington, D. E. M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Privatization, information and incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(4), 567-579. doi:10.2307/3323510.
• Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133-150. doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.133.
• Stark, A. (2002). What is the new public management? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(1), 137-151. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003520.
• Train, T. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Van Helden, G. J. (2000). Is financial stress an incentive for the adoption of businesslike planning and control in local government? A comparative study of eight Dutch municipalities. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(1), 83-100. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00098.
• Verhoest, K., Verschuere, B., Meyers, F., & Sulle, A. (2010). Performance of public sector organizations: Do managerial tools matter? In P. Lægreid & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Governance of public sector organizations. Proliferation, autonomy and performance, Part III, Chapter XI (pp. 211-234). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Walls, M., Macauley, M., & Anderson, S. (2005). Private markets, contracts, and government provision: What explains the organization of local waste and recycling markets? Urban Affairs Review, 40(5), 590-613. doi:10.1177/1078087404273342.
• Wang, X., Dennis, L., & Tu, Y. S. (2007). Measuring financial condition: A study of U.S. states. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(2), 1-21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00872.x
• Warner, M. (2006). Market-based governance and the challenge for rural governments: US trends. Social Policy and Administration: An International Journal of Policy Research, 40(6), 612-631. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00523.x
• Warner, M., & Hefetz, A. (2003). Rural-urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(5), 703-718. doi:10.1068/c008r
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson, South-Western.
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., & Muñiez-Pérez, M. A. (2010). Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: Improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(4), 609-629. doi:10.1068/c09118.
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Lopez-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009a). Developing a model to measure financial condition in local government: Evaluating service quality and minimizing the effects of the socioeconomic environment: An application to Spanish municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 425-449. doi:10.1177/ 0275074008320710.
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Lopez-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009b). Evaluating financial performance in local government: Maximizing the benchmarking value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 151-167. doi:10.1177/0020852308099510.
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Prior, D., Plata-Diaz, A. M., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2013). Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments' waste management services. Public Administration, 91(1), 51-68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02012.x
• Zullo, R. (2009). Does fiscal stress induce privatization? Correlates of private and intermunicipal contracting, 1992-2002. Governance, 22(3), 459-481. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01447.x