Datos textuales como elementos activos en sensometría

  1. Álvarez Esteban, Ramón
  2. Aguado Rodríguez, Pedro José
Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
  1. Mures Quintana, María Jesús (coord.)

ISSN: 1699-9495

Year of publication: 2012

Issue Title: Estadística aplicada a la Investigación Cuantitativa = Applied statistics to Quantitative Research

Issue: 1

Pages: 31-51

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18002/PEC.V0I2012.1106 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales

Sustainable development goals


The use of textual data in statistical studies into sensometric field has been conducted generally seeking to explain and interpret results obtained from quantitative data. This work shows a methodology that allows use textual data as active elements. Two wine tastings illustrate the procedure

Bibliographic References

  • Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Chollet, D. y Chrea, C. (2007). Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 627-640.
  • Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Engen, T. y Ekman, G. (1973). Multidimensional analysis of twenty-one odors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14, 131-137.
  • Brochet, F. y Dubourdieu, D. (2001). Wine Descriptive Language Supports Cognitive Specificity of Chemical Senses. Brain and Language, 77(2), 187-196.
  • Campo, E., Ballester, J., Langlois, J., Dacremont, C. y Valentin, D. (2010). Comparison of conventional descriptive analysis and a citation frequency-based descriptive method for odor profiling: An application to Burgundy Pinot noir wines. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 44-55.
  • Delarue, J. y Sieffermann, J-M. (2004). Sensory mapping using Flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 383-392.
  • Escofier, B. y Pagès, J. (1990). Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: Objectifs, méthodes, interprétations. Paris: Dunod.
  • Escofier, B. y Pagès, J. (1994). Multiple factor analysis (AFMULT package). Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 18, 121-140.
  • Gower, J.C. y Dijksterhuis, G.B. (2004). Procrustes problems. Oxford University Press.
  • Husson, F., Lê, S. y Mazet, J. (2007). FactoMineR: Factor Analysis and Data Mining with R.R package version 2.4.0, URL http://factominer.free.fr/ (accessed September 2010).
  • Josse, J., Pagès, J. y Husson, F. (2008). Testing the significance of the RV coefficient.
  • Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, 82-91.
  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1990). Principles of multivariate analysis, a user's perspective. Oxford Statistical Science Series.
  • Lawless, H.T., Sheng, N. y Knoops, S. (1995). Multidimensional-scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 91-98.
  • Labbé, D. (1990). Normes de dépouillement et procédures d’analyse des textes politiques, CERAT.
  • Labbé, D., Rytz, A. y Hugi, A. (2004). Training is a critical step to obtain reliable product profiles in a real food industry context. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 341-348.
  • Lebart, L., Salem, A. y Berry, L. (1998). Exploring textual data. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Lelièvre, M., Chollet, S., Abdi, H. y Valentin, D. (2008). What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 697-703.
  • Pagès, J. (2003). Recueil direct de distances sensorielles: Application à l’évaluation de dix vins blancs du Val-de-Loire. Sciences des Aliments, 23, 679-688.
  • Pagès, J. (2005). Collection and analysis of perceived product interdistances using multiple factor analysis: application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Quality and Preference, 16(7), 642-649.
  • Perrin, L. y Pagès, J. (2009). Construction of a product space from the ultra-flash profiling method: application to 10 red wines from the Loire Valley. Journal of Sensory Studies, 24(3), 372-395.
  • Sauvageot, F., Urdapilleta, I. y Peyron, D. (2006). Within and between variations of texts elicited from nine wine experts. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6), 429-444.
  • Takane, Y. (1980). Analysis of categorizing behavior by a quantification method. Behaviormetrika, 8, 75-86.
  • Takane, Y. (1982). IDSORT: An individual differences multidimensional scaling for sorting data.
  • Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 546.
  • Williams, E.J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Ser. A 2, 149-168.