Validation of a tactical analysis methodology for the study of pick and roll in basketball

  1. Vaquera Jiménez, Alejandro
  2. Cubillo León, Rodrigo
  3. García-Tormo, J.V.
  4. Morante Rábago, Juan Carlos
Aldizkaria:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Alea: 22

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 277-281

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de psicología del deporte

Laburpena

This study examines the design and validation of a tactical analysis methodology proposal for the study of pick and roll in basketball, applying the principles of observational methodology and the recording of actions in their natural context. We have developed three phases: Phase 1) Identification and selection of analysis variables, in which behavioral variables have been identified and cataloged (pick and roll), contextual analysis variables (court area, time of possession and period of play) and evaluative analysis variables (result of the action); Phase 2) Ad hoc creation of recording instruments, in which a computer tool was adapted (VA-Sports Software: Basketball) to address the particularities and specific needs of the study of the pick and roll situations.; and Phase 3) Quality control of the data, in which selection criteria were set for the sample, the training process of the observers was carried out, and the level of internal agreement and intraobserver concordance were verified in order to assess the reliability of the methodological approach. A total of 192 pick and roll situations corresponding to 6 games of the Spanish ACB League were analyzed in this study. The results suggest a high level of reliability of the methodology designed; as a whole it earned a high average Kappa value (.994), leading to the conclusion that the proposed analysis variables are precise in their definition and categorization in order to study pick and roll situations. The analysis variables; time of possession, period of play and results of the action showed a maximum level of agreement (Kappa value 1.000), while the analysis variables; pick and roll and court area also show a high degree of objectivity (Kappa values of .990 and .981 respectively).

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Anguera, M. T. (1989). Metodología de la observación en las ciencias humanas. Madrid: Editorial Cátedra.
  • Anguera, M. T. (2009). Los deportes de equipo estudiados desde la metodología observacional: Diferentes perspectivas de la misma realidad? Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Deportes de Equipo. A Coruña: Universidad de Coruña.
  • Carron, A. V., Loughhead, T. M. and Bray, S. R. (2005) The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1993) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences 23(4), 395-407.
  • Christoforidis, C., Papadimitrou, K., Taxildaris, K., Aggelousis, N. and Gourgoulis, V. (2000) Evaluation of free shot contribution in winning a basketball game during European Championships. Exercise and Society Journal of Sports Science 24, 68-72.
  • Cohen, J. A. (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
  • De Rose, D. (2004). Statistical analysis of basketball performance indicators according to home/away games and winning and losing teams. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 47(4), 327-336.
  • Gómez, M. A., Lorenzo, A., Ortega, E. and Olmedilla, A. (2007). Diferencias de los indicadores de rendimiento en baloncesto femenino entre ganadores y perdedores en función de jugar como local o como visitante. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 16(1), 41-54.
  • Gómez, M. A., Lorenzo, A., Ibáñez, S. J., Ortega, E., Leite, N. and Sampaio, J. (2010) Analysis of defensive strategies used by home and away basketball teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(1), 159-166.
  • Huciñski, T., and Tymañski, R. (2006). The structure of technical-tactical actions and the effectiveness of the youth Polish National Team, European Basketball Vice-Champions. Medsportpress, 12(2), 267-271.
  • Ibáñez, S. J., Sampaio, J., Sáenz-López, P., Giménez, J. and Janeira, M. A. (2003) Game statistics discriminating of junior World Basketball Championship matches (Portugal 1999). Journal of Human Movement Studies 45, 1-19.
  • Ibáñez, S. J., Sampaio, J., Feu, S., Lorenzo, A., Gómez, M. A. and Ortega, E. (2008). Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams' season-long success. European Journal of Sport Science, 8(6), 369-372.
  • Ittenbach, R. I. and Esters, I. G. (1995). Utility of team indices for predicting end of season ranking in two national polls. Journal of Sport Behavior, 18, 216-224.
  • Kubatko, J., Oliver, D., Pelton, K. and Rosenbaum, D. (2007). A starting point for analyzing basketball statistics. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 3(3), 1-22.
  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
  • Lapresa, D., García, J., Arana, J. and Garzón, B. (2011). Análisis de patrones temporales en las rutinas gestuales previas al tiro libre de baloncesto, en la categoría alevín. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 20(2), 383-400
  • Madrigal, R. and James, J. (1999). Team quality and the home advantage. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 381-398.
  • Melnick, M. J. (2001) Relationship between team assists and win-loss record in the National Basketball Association. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 595-602.
  • Mexas, K., Tsitskaris, G., Kyriakou, D. and Garefis, A. (2005). Comparison of effectiveness of organized offences between two different championships in high level basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5, 72-82.
  • Medina, J. and Delgado, M. A. (1999). Metodología de entrenamiento de observadores para investigadores sobre E. F. y Deporte en las que se utilice como método la observación. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 5, 69-86.
  • Morante, J. C. (2009). Análisis del rendimiento en Deportes de Equipo: del Registro Estadístico al Análisis Táctico. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Deportes de Equipo. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.
  • Ortega, E., Palao, J. M., Gómez, M. A., Lorenzo, A. and Cárdenas, D. (2007). Analysis of the efficacy of possessions in boys' 16-and-under basketball teams: differences between winning and losing teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 961-964.
  • Sampaio, J. and Janeira, M. (2003) Statistical analyses of basketball team performance: understanding team's wins and losses according to a different index of ball possessions. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 3, 40-49.
  • Sampaio, J., Janeira, M., Ibáñez, S. J. and Lorenzo, A. (2006) Discriminant analysis of game related statistics between basketball guards, forwards and centres in three professional leagues. European Journal of Sports Sciences 6(3), 173-178.
  • Sindik, J. and Jukiç, I. (2011). Differences in situation efficacy indicators at the elite basketball players that play on different positions in the team. Collegium Antropologicum 35(4), 1095-1104.
  • Trniniź, S., Dizdar, D. and Luksi?, E. (2002). Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final tournaments of European club championship. Collegium Antropologicum 26(2), 521-531.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet