Effect of different times and techniques of molybdenum applicationon chickpea (Cicer arietinum) growth and yield

  1. Valenciano Montenegro, José Benito
  2. Marcelo Gabella, Victoriano
  3. Miguélez Frade, M. M.
Revista:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 9

Número: 4

Páginas: 1271-1278

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/20110904-516-10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Molybdenum (Mo) plays an important role in increasing chickpea yield. In 2009, we studied the effects of different Mo application times and techniques on the response of the Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum) to Mo nutrition. Pot experiments were conducted under natural conditions using two different soils from northwest Spain and following a factorial statistical pattern (7 × 2) with six replicates for each soil. A treatment of 2 mg Mo pot�1 was added to the pots at six different moments, 1 to 6 weeks after emergence (WAE), using two different application techniques (soil and foliar). Both growth and yield were affected by Mo application, but yield was more affected than total dry matter. The response was greater in the medium acid soil than in the neutral-slightly basic soil. At maturity, plants fertilized at 4 WAE produced a greater seed yield, mainly due to an increase in the number of pods per plant. Foliar Mo application was more effective, and soil Mo application should be carried out earlier in the cycle. An interaction was found between time and technique of Mo application, with the highest yield being obtained when Mo was applied at 4 WAE using foliar fertilization

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahlawat I.P.S., 1990. Diagnosis and alleviation of mineral nutrients constraints in chickpea. In: Chickpea in nineties. Proc Second Int Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, Dec. 1989. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. pp. 93-100.
  • Ahlawat I.P.S., Gangaiah B., Ashraf Zadid M., 2007. Nutrient management in chickpea. In: Chickpea breeding and management (Yadav S.S., Redden R., Chen W., Sharma, B., eds.). CAB Int, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. pp. 213-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932138.010
  • Ali M., Dahan R., Mishra J.P., Saxena N.P., 2000. Towards the more efficient use of water and nutrients in food. In: Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st Century: Proc Third Int Food Legumes Res Conf, Adelaide, Australia, 22-26 September (Knight R., ed.). Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 355-368.
  • Ali M., Mishra J.P., 2001. Effect of foliar nutrition of boron and molybdenum on chickpea. Indian J Pulses Res 14, 41-43.
  • Ankerman D., Large R., 1974. Soil and plant analysis. A&L Agricultural Lab Inc. NY, USA.
  • Berger P.G., Vieira C., Araújo G.A.A., 1996. Efeito de doses e épocas de aplicação molibdênio sobre a cultura do feijção. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 31, 473-480.
  • Bhanavase D.B, Patil P.L., 1994. Effects of molybdenum on nodulation in gram. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 19, 127-129.
  • Braga N.R., Vieira C., 1998. Efeito da inoculação com Bradyrhizobium sp., nitrogênio e micronutrientes no rendimento do grão-de-bico. Bragantia 57, 349-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051998000200016
  • Deo C., Kothari M.L., 2002.Effect of modes and levels of molybdenum application on grain yield protein content and nodulation of chickpea grown on loamy sand soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 2905-2915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120014490
  • Fageria N.K., Baligar V.C., Jones C.A., 1997. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. M. Deker, NY, USA.
  • Fageria N.K., Barbosa M.P., Moreira A., Guimaraes C.M., 2009.Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J Plant Nutr 32, 1044-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904160902872826
  • Gupta U.C., 1997. Molybdenum in agriculture. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511574689
  • Khan H.R., 1998. Response of chickpea (Cicerarietinum) to zinc supply and water deficits. PhD thesis, Dept Plant Sci, Univ Adelaide, Glen Osmond, Australia.
  • Maiti R.K., Wesche-Ebeling P., 2001. Vegetative and reproductive growth and productivity. In: Advances in chickpea science (Maiti R., Wesche-Ebeling P., eds). Sci Publ, Enfield, NH, USA. pp. 67-104.
  • Ondategui J., 1996. El garbanzo. In: El cultivo de las leguminosas de grano en Castilla y León. Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain. pp. 357-398.
  • Roy R.N., Finck A., Blair G.J., Tandon H.L.S., 2006. Plant nutrition for food security. A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 16. FAO, Rome, Italy. 368 pp.
  • Shiln.C., Noor S., Hossain M.A., 2007. Effects of boron and molybdenum on the yield of chickpea. J Agric Rural Develop (Gazipur) 5, 17-24.
  • Sillanpää M., 1972. Trace elements in soils and agriculture. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  • Silveira P.M., Dynia J.F., Zimmermann F.J.P., 1996. Resposta do feijoeiro irrigado a boro, zinco e molibdênio. Ciênc Agrotec 20, 198–204.
  • Sims T.T., 2000. Soil fertility evaluation. In: Handbook of soil science (Summer, M.E., ed).CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 113-154.
  • Singh A., Sandhu J.S., 2006. Genotype × environment interaction in chickpea. Crop Improv 33, 67-69.
  • Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H., 1986. Bioestadística: principios y procedimientos. McGraw Hill, México DF, México.
  • Valenciano J.B., Miguélez-Frade M.M., Marcelo V., 2009. Response of chickpea (Cicerarietinum) to soil zinc application. Span J Agric Res 7, 952-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009074-1112
  • Valenciano J.B., Boto J.A., Marcelo V., 2010. Response of chickpea (CicerarietinumL) to zinc, boron and molybdenum application under pot conditions. Span J Agric Res 8, 797-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010083-1281
  • Valenciano J.B., Boto J.A., Marcelo V., 2011. Chickpea (CicerarietinumL) response to zinc, boron and molybdenum application under field conditions. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci, 39.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet