Efectos de la cooperación sobre el desarrollo de innovaciones organizativas

  1. Sánchez González, Gloria
Revista:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Año de publicación: 2014

Título del ejemplar: Conceptos aactuales en dirección estratégica

Número: 391

Páginas: 77-86

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Economía industrial

Resumen

Tradicionalmente las investigaciones sobre los efectos de la cooperación en innovación han estado centradas en los avances de tipo tecnológico. Sin embargo, dado que las innovaciones no tecnológicas inciden cada vez más en la competitividad de las empresas, el interés por su estudio se ha acrecentado en los últimos años. Es por ello que el objetivo del presente trabajo consiste en analizar los efectos que la cooperación con una serie de agentes externos (proveedores, clientes, competidores, expertos y consultoras y universidades y centros públicos de investigación) puede ejercer sobre el desarrollo de un tipo concreto de innovaciones no tecnológicas: las innovaciones organizativas. La principal conclusión del estudio es que, exceptuando la cooperación con competidores, el resto de agentes influyen de manera positiva y significativa sobre el desarrollo de innovaciones de este tipo, si bien la magnitud del efecto varía en función del agente concreto con el que la empresa coopera.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AFCHA CHÁVEZ, S.M. (2011): «Innovaciones organizacionales y su efecto sobre el desempeño empresarial», Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 56:16, pp.544- 563.
  • ARMBRUSTER, H.: KIRNER, E. y LAY, G. (2006): Patterns of organisational change in European industry (PORCH). Ways to strengthen the empirical basis of research and policy, Fraunhofer Institute of Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.
  • ARMBRUSTER, H.: BIKFALVI, A.; KINKEL, S. y Lay, G. (2008): «Orga nizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys», Technovation, 28, pp. 644–657.
  • AZAGRA-CARO, J.M.: ARCHONTAKIS, F.; GUTIERREZ-GRACÍA, A. y Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006): «Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity», Research Policy, 35, pp. 37–55.
  • BARALDI, E.; GRESSETVOLD, E. y HARRISON, D. (2012): «Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Introduction to the special issue», Journal of Business Research, 65, pp.123–127.
  • BELDERBOS, R.: CARREE, M. y LOKSHIN, B. (2004a): «Cooperative R&D and firm performance», Research Policy, 33, pp. 1477-1492.
  • BELDERBOS, R.; CARREE, M.; DIEDEREN, B.; LOKSHIN, B. y VEUGE LERS, R. (2004b): «Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies», International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, pp. 1237-1263.
  • BESSANT, J. y RUSH, H. (1995): «Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer», Research Policy, 24, pp. 97–114.
  • BIRKINSHAW, J.; HAMEL, G. Y MOL, M.J. (2008): «Management innovation». Academy of Management Review, 33:4, pp. 825-845.
  • BLACK, S.E. y LYNCH, L.M. (2004): «What´s Driving the New Economy? The Benefits of Workplace Innovation», Economic Journal, 114, pp. 97-116.
  • BOGERS, M.; AFUAH, A. y BASTIAN, B. (2010): «Users as innovators: A review, critique and future research directions», Journal of Management, 36:4, pp. 857-875.
  • BRUCE, M. y MORRIS, B. (1998): «In house, out-sourced or a mixed approach to design», En: Bruce, M. y Jevnaker, B. (Eds.), Management of Design Alliances: Sustaining Competitive Advan tage, Ed. Wiley, Chichester.
  • CALOGHIROU, Y.; HONDROYIANNIS, G. y VONORTAS, N. S. (2003): «The performance of research partnerships», Managerial and Decision Economics, 24:2–3, pp. 85–99.
  • CAMISÓN, C. y VILLAR-LÓPEZ, A. (2011): «Non-technical innovation: Organizational memory and learning capabilities as ante cedent factors with effects on sustained competitive advantage», Industrial Marketing Management, 40, pp. 1294–1304.
  • CAMISÓN, C. y VILLAR-LÓPEZ, A. (2014): «Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance». Journal of Business Research, 67, pp. 2891-2902.
  • CASSIMAN, B. y VEUGELERS, R. (2002): «R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium», American Economic Review, 92:4, pp. 1169–1184.
  • CHESBROUGH, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The new imperative for creation and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School.
  • COHEN, W.M.; NELSON, R.R. y Walsh, J. (2002): «Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D», Mana gement Science, 48, pp. 1-23.
  • DANNEELS, E. (2002): «The dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competencies», Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 1095-1121.
  • DE FARIA, P.; LIMA, F. y SANTOS, R. (2010): «Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners», Research Policy, 39, pp. 1082–1092.
  • EMDEN, Z.; CALANTONE, R. J. y DROGE, C. (2006): «Collaborating for New Products Development: Selecting the Partner with Maximum Potential to Create Value», Journal of Product Inno vation Management, 23, pp. 330-341.
  • ERICKSON, C. y JACOBY, S. (2003): «The effects of employer networks on workplace innovation and training», Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, pp. 203–223.
  • EVANGELISTA, R. y VEZZANI, A. (2010): «The Economic Impact of Technological and Organizational Innovations. A Firm-level Anaylsis», Research Policy, 39, pp. 1253-1263.
  • FOSS, N.J.; LAURSEN, K. y PEDERSEN, T. (2011): «Linking customer interaction and innovation: the mediating role of new organizational practices», Organization Science. 22:4, pp. 980–999.
  • FRENZ, M. y IETTO-GILLIES, G. (2009): «The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey», Research Policy, 38, pp. 1125–1135.
  • FRITSCH, M. y LUKAS, R. (2001): «Who cooperates on R&D?», Research Policy, 30, pp. 297-312.
  • GERA, S. y GU, W. (2004): «The Effect of Organizational Inno vation and Information and Communications Technology on Firm Performance», International Productivity Monitor, 9, pp. 37-51.
  • GREENE, W.H. (1999): Análisis Econométrico, 3ª Ed., Madrid, Prentice Hall.
  • GREENE, W.H. (2000): Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.
  • HAGEDOORN, J. (2002): «Inter-firm R&D partnership: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960», Research Policy, 31:4, pp. 477–492.
  • HAMEL, G. (2006): «The why, what and how of management innovation». Harvard Business Review, Febrero, pp. 72-84.
  • HAMEL, G. (2007): The future of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • HAMEL, G. (2009): «Management innovation». Leadership Exce llence, 26:5, 5.
  • JEPPESEN, L.B. (2002): «Making Consumer Knowledge Available and Useful. The Case of the Computer Games», DRUID Working Paper nº 01-10, 2ª version.
  • JORDÁ BORRELL, R. (2005): «Modificación del entorno y proceso innovador de las empresas de servicios avanzados en Anda lucía», Investigaciones Geográficas, 37, pp. 73-92.
  • LAM, A. (2005): «Organizational innovation», En: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. y Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 115-147.
  • LANDRY, R. y AMARA, N. (2001): «Creativity, innovation and business practices in the matter of knowledge management», En: De la Mothe, J. y Foray, D. (Eds.): Knowledge Management in the Innovation Process: Business Practices and Technology Adoption, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA., pp. 55-80.
  • LAURSEN, K. (2011): «User–producer interaction as a driver of innovation: costs and advantages in an open innovation model», Science and Public Policy, 38:9, pp. 713-723.
  • LIKER, J.K.; KAMTH, R.R.; WASTI, S.N. y NAGAMACHI, M. (1996): «Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences?», Research Policy, 25, pp. 59-89.
  • LILIEN, G.; MORRISON, P.D.; SEARLS, K.; SONNACK, M. y VON HIPPEL, E. (2002): «Performance assessment of the lead user generation process for new product development», Management Science, 48:8, pp. 1042-1060.
  • LINK, A. N. y SCOTT, J.T. (2005): «Universities as partners in U.S. research joint ventures», Research Policy, 34, pp. 385–393
  • LÓPEZ, A. (2008): «Determinants of R&D cooperation: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms», International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26:1, pp. 113–136.
  • MEEUS, M.T. H. y EDQUIST, C. (2006): «Introduction to part I: product and process innovation». En: Hage, J. y Meeus, M. (Eds.), Inno vation, Science and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23-37.
  • MIOTTI, L. y SACHWALD, F. (2003): «Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis», Research Policy, 32, pp. 1481–1499.
  • MOWERY, D.C.; OXLEY, J.E. y SILVERMAN, B.S. (1998): «Tech nological Overlap and Interfirm Cooperation: Implications for the Resource Base View of the Firm», Research Policy, 27, pp. 507-523.
  • MURPHY, M. (2002): «Organisational Change and Firm Pe rformance», OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
  • NAIDOO, V. (2010): «Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy», Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp. 1311-1320.
  • NGUYEN, T. y MOTHE, C. (2008): «Assessing the impact of Marke ting and Organizational Innovations on Firm Performance», International Business Information Management Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • NIETO, M.J. y SANTAMARÍA, L. (2007): «The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation», Technovation, 27:6-7, pp. 367-377.
  • OCDE (2005): Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation dates. Third Edition. Paris.
  • RITTER, T. y GEMÜNDEN, H.G. (2003): «Interorganizational relationships and networks: an overview», Journal of Business Research, 56, pp. 691-697.
  • ROMIJN, H. y ALBABADEJO, M. (2002): «Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England». Research Policy, 31:7, 1053-1067.
  • ROMIJN, H. y ALBU, M. (2002): «Innovation, networking and proximity: lessons from small high technology firms in the UK», Regional Studies, 36, pp. 81-86.
  • SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, G.; GONZÁLEZ-ÁLVAREZ, N. y NIETO, M.J. (2008): «Efectos de la colaboración con usuarios sobre el tipo de innovación desarrollado», Innovar: Journal of Administrative and Social Sciences, 18:32, pp. 87-110.
  • TETHER, B. (2002): «Who cooperates for innovation and why. An empirical analysis», Research Policy, 31, pp. 947-967.
  • TÖDTLING, F.; LEHNER, P. y KAUFMANN, A. (2009): «Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?», Technovation, 29, pp. 59-71.
  • Tomlinson, P.R. (2010): «Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing», Research Policy, 39, pp. 762–775.
  • UHLANER, L.; Van STEL, A.; MEIJAARD, J. y FOLKERINGA, M. (2007): «The Relationship between Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Dutch SMEs», Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs (report), pp. 1-26.
  • VEUGELERS, R. y CASSIMAN, B. (2005): «R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing». International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, pp. 355– 379.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1987): «Cooperation Between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading,», Research Policy, 16, pp. 291-302.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation. Ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • WAGNER, S.M. y HOEGL, M. (2006): «Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers», Industrial Marketing Management, 35:8, pp. 936–943.
  • YANG, J.; WANG, S.; WU, L. y LAN, H. (2008): «An Empirical Study on the Relationships among Inter-firm Cooperation, Knowledge Creation and Organizational Innovation», The Seventh Wuhan international Conference on E-Business: Unlocking the full potential of global technology. Proceedings, 31 de Mayo 31- 1 de Junio, 2008, Wuhan, China.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet