Fuentes externas de conocimiento y su efecto sobre el esfuerzo innovador en los sectores industriales y de servicios en España

  1. Sánchez González, Gloria
  2. Herrera, Liliana
Revista:
Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
  1. Nieto Antolín, Mariano (coord.)

ISSN: 1699-9495

Año de publicación: 2008

Título del ejemplar: Dimensiones de la dirección estratégica de la empresa : nuevas perspectivas teóricas y análisis empíricos

Número: 1

Páginas: 205-223

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18002/PEC.V0I2008.794 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Hoy en día, no son los fabricantes los únicos encargados del desarrollo de nuevos productos, procesos o servicios, sino que se hace necesario reconocer la importancia que tienen otros agentes externos a la empresa como fuente de actividades innovadoras. La complejidad y dinamismo de los entornos actuales obliga a las empresas a complementar su base interna de conocimientos con otros procedentes del exterior. Estas circunstancias han llevado a distinguir entre fuentes internas y externas de innovación. Puesto que las primeras han sido suficientemente estudiadas y analizadas en la literatura, el presente trabajo pretende avanzar sobre el conocimiento de las segundas y sus implicaciones en la actividad innovadora de las empresas. Para ello se ha analizado la influencia de nueve de esas fuentes externas sobre la intensidad total de la actividad innovadora y de las actividades de I+D intramuros y extramuros del conjunto del sector productivo español durante el periodo 2001-2003, llegando a la conclusión de que los clientes son quienes mayor impacto ejercen en los tres casos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARNEY, J.B. (1986a) "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy", Management Science, Vol. 32, 10, pp. 1231-1241.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1986b) "Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, 3, pp. 656-665.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1991) "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1, pp. 99-120.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1995) "Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage", Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9, pp. 49-61.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (2001) "Is the Resource-Based 'View' a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, , pp. 41-56.
  • CHAN, T.Y. & J.F. LEE (2004) "A Comparative Study of Online User Communities Involvement In Product Innovation and Development", th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT.
  • COHEN, W.M. & D.A. LEVINTHAL (1989) "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D", The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, 397, pp. 569-596.
  • DIERICKX, I. & K. COOL (1989) "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage", Management Science, Vol. 35, 12, pp. -1511.
  • FRANKE, N. & S. SHAH (2003) "How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users", Research Policy, Vol. 32, 1, pp. 157-178.
  • HAGEDOORN, J. (1993) "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Models of Cooperation and Sectorial Differences", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 5, pp. 371-385.
  • HENKEL, J. & E. VON HIPPEL (2004) "Welfare Implications of User Innovation", The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 30, 1-2, pp. 73-87.
  • HERSTATT, C. & E. VON HIPPEL (1992) "FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing NewProduct Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a 'Low-Tech' Field", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, 3, pp. -221.
  • HLADIK, K. (1985) International Joint Ventures. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
  • INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA (2003) Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica de las Empresas 2003. Madrid: INE.
  • JEPPESEN, L.B. (2002) "Making Consumer Knowledge Available and Useful. The Case of the Computer Games", DRUID Working Paper nº 01-10, 2ª version.
  • JEPPESEN, L.B. (2005) "User Toolkits for Innovation: Consumers Support Each Other", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, 4, pp. 347-362.
  • LILIEN, G.L. et al. (2002) "Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development", Management Science, Vol. 48, 8, pp. 1042-1059.
  • LINK, A. & L. BAUER (1989) Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing. Lexintong, Massachussetts: Lexington Books.
  • LUNDVALL, B.A. (1988) "Innovation as an Interactive Process: from User Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation". G. DOSI et al. (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory. Londres, UK.: Printer Publishers, pp. 349-369.
  • LÜTHJE, C. (2004) "Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers", Technovation, Vol. 24, 9, pp. 683-695.
  • LÜTHJE, C., C. HERSTATT & E. VON HIPPEL (2005) "User-Innovators and 'Local' Information: The Case of Mountain Biking", Research Policy, Vol. 34, 6, pp. 951-965.
  • MALERBA, F. (2005) "Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs Across Sectors". J. FAGERBERG, D. MOWERY & R. NELSON (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • MARSHALL, A. (1925) Principles of Economics. Londres, UK.: Macmillan. OCDE (1997) OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
  • PENROSE, E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
  • PETERAF, M.A. (1993) "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource Based-View", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 3, pp. -191.
  • RAY, G.; J.B. BARNEY & W.A. MUHANNA (2004) "Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, 1, pp. 23-37.
  • ROSENBERG, N. (1976) Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • SHAH, S. (2000) "Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment", MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper nº 4105.
  • TEECE, D.J. (1984) "Economic Analysis and Strategic Management", California Management Review, Vol. 26, 3, pp. 87-110.
  • THOMKE, S. & A. NIMGADE (1998) "Note on Lead User Research", Harvard Business School. Note: 9-699-014.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1976) "The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process", Research Policy, Vol. 5, 2, pp. 212-239.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1977a) "The Dominant Role of the User in Semiconductor and Electronic Subassembly Process Innovation", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-24, pp. 60-71.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1986) "Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts", Management Science, Vol. 32, 7, pp. 791-805.
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (1998) "Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of 'sticky' Local Information", Management Science, Vol. 44, 5, pp. 629-
  • VON HIPPEL, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • WANG, J.C. (1994) "Cooperative Research in a Newly Industrialized Country: Taiwan", Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 697-711.
  • WERNERFELT, B. (1984) "A Resource Base View of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet