Fuentes externas de información para el desarrollo de innovacionesun análisis de la evidencia en Europa y España

Bibliographic References

• BARNEY, J. B. (1995). “Looking inside for competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9, pp. 49-61.
• BARNEY, J.B. (1986a). “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy”, Management Science, Vol. 32, nº 10, pp. 1231-1241.
• BARNEY, J.B. (1986b). “Organizational Culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, nº 3, pp. 656-665.
• BARNEY, J.B. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, nº 1, pp. 99-120.
• BARNEY, J.B. (2001). “Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, nº 1, pp. 41-56.
• BAYONA, C.; GARCÍA-MARCO, T.; HUERTA, E. (2000). “Firms´ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 30, nº 8, pp. 1289-1307.
• CHAN, T.Y.; LEE, J.F. (2004). “A Comparative Study of Online User Communities Involvement in Product Innovation and Development”, 13th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT.
• COHEN, W.M.; LEVINTHAL, DA. (1990). “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, nº 1, pp. 128-152.
• COLOMBO, M.G.; GARRONE, P. (1996). “Technological cooperative agreements and firm´s R&D intensity. A note on causality relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 923-932.
• CUBILLO PINILLA, J. M.; CERVIÑO FERNÁNDEZ, J. (2005). “Market access spillovers. Evidence form the Spanish automotive industry”, Esic Market, nº 120, January-April, pp.19-49.
• DE PABLOS HEREDERO, C.; PELECHANO BARAHONA, E. (2006). “Services in the Information Society: The use of web-based technologies in The Spanish Nacional Tax Agency”, Esic Market, nº 123, January-April, pp. 23-45.
• DIERICKX, I.; COOL, K. (1989). “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage”,Management Science, Vol. 35, nº 12, pp. 1504-1511.
• ENOS, J.L. (1962). Petroleum Progress and Profits: A History of Process Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• EUROPEAN COMIMISSION AND EUROSTAT (2004). “Innovation in Europe. Results for the EU, Iceland and Norway”. Data 1998-2000 Luxemburg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• FRANKE, N.; SHAH, S. (2003). “How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users”. Research Policy, Vol. 32, nº 1, pp. 157-178.
• FRANKE, N.; VON HIPPEL, E. (2003). “Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, nº 7, pp.119-1215.
• FREEMAN, C. (1968). “Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market”. National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp. 29-57.
• GONZÁLEZ SÁNCHEZ, M.; RODENES ADAM, M.; ALVAREZ CLAU, S. (2005). “An Evaluation of the relative influence of IT on the result criteria of the EFQMmodel compared with the effect of other cause criteria”, Esic Market, nº 122, September-December, pp. 213-239.
• HAGEDOORN, J. (2002). “Inter-firms partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960” Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 477-492.
• HARS, A.; OU, S. (2001). “Working for free? – Motivations for Participating in Open Source Projects”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, nº 3, pp. 25-40.
• HENKEL, J.; THIES, S. (2003). “Customization and Innovation – User Innovation Toolkits for Simulator Software”, en Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Mass Customizations and Personalization, MCPC 2003, Munich.
• HENKEL, J.; VON HIPPEL, E. (2004). “Welfare implications of user innovation”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 30, nº 1-2, pp. 73-87.
• HERSTATT, C.; VON HIPPEL, E. (1992). “FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, nº 3, pp. 213-221.
• HERTEL, G.; NIEDNER, S.; HERRMANN, S. (2003). “Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1159-1177.
• INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA (2003). Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica de las Empresas 2003, INE, Madrid.
• JEPPESEN, L.B. (2002). “Making Consumer Knowledge Available and Useful. The Case of the Computer Games”. DRUID Working Paper nº 01-10, 2ª version.
• JEPPESEN, L.B. (2005). “User toolkits for innovation: consumers support each other”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, nº 4, pp. 347-362.
• JEPPESEN, L.B.; FREDERIKSEN, L. (2004). “Innovative Users in a Firma-Established User Community: The Characteristics of users co-developing computer controlled music instruments”, DRUID, PhD Winter Conference, Aalborg.
• JEPPESEN, L.B.; MOLIN, N.J. (2003). “Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 15, nº 3, pp. 363-383.
• LAKHANI, K.R.; VON HIPPEL, E. (2003). “How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, nº 6, pp. 923-943.
• LEONARD, D.; RAYPORT, J. (1997). “Spark Innovation through Empathic Design”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, nº 6, p. 102- 113.
• LERNER, J.; TIROLE, J. (2002). “Some simple economics of open source”. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.46, nº 2, 125-156.
• LILIEN, G.L. et. al. (2002). “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development”,Management Science, Vol. 48, nº 8, pp. 1042-1059.
• LIONETTA, W.G. (1977). “Sources of Innovation Within the Pultrusion Industry”, S.M. Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
• LÓPEZ CABARCOS, M. A.; VÁZQUEZ RODRÍGUEZ, P.; MUÑOZ FERREIRO, N. (2006). “A study of entrepreneurship in Spain through a cluster analysis”, Esic Market, nº 124, May-August, pp. 117-143.
• LUNDVALL, B.A. (1988). “Innovation as an Interactive Process: from User Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation”, en: Dosi, G. et. al. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. Printer Publishers, Londres, UK, pp. 349-369.
• LÜTHJE, C. (2003). “Customers as Co-Inventors: An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents of Customer-Driven Innovations in the Field of Medical Equipment”, en: Proceedings of the 32th EMAC Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
• LÜTHJE, C. (2004). “Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: an empirical study of sport-related product consumers”, Technovation, Vol. 24, nº 9, pp. 683-695.
• LÜTHJE, C.; HERSTATT, C.; VON HIPPEL, E. (2005). “User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking”, Research Policy, Vol. 34, nº 6, pp. 951-965.
• MARSHALL, A. (1925). Principles of Economics. Macmillan, Londres, UK.
• MOLINA COLLADO, A.; BLÁZQUEZ RESINO, J. J. (2005). “The role of information sources in touristic consumers´choice”, Esic Market, nº 120, January-April, pp. 243-262.
• MORRISON, P.D.; ROBERTS, J.H.; VON HIPPEL, E. (2000). “Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market”, Management Science, Vol. 46, nº 12, pp. 1513-1527.
• NAVARRO ARANCEGUI, M. (2002). “La cooperación para la innovación en la empresa española desde una perspectiva internacional comparada”, Revista Economía Industrial, nº 346, pp. 47-66.
• NOOTEBOOM, B. (1999). “Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy” Research Policy, Vol. 28, pp. 793-805.
• OECD (1997). OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data Oslo Manual, OECD Publications Service, Paris.
• PENROSE, E.T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley: New York.
• PEREZ-PEREZ, M.; SÁNCHEZ, A. (2002). “Lean production and technology networks in the Spanish automotive supplier industry”, Management International Review, Vol. 42; pp. 261-277.
• PETERAF, M.A. (1993). “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource based-view”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, nº 3, pp. 179-191.
• PITTAWAY, L.; ROBERTSON, M.; MUNIR, K.; DENYER, D.; NEELY, A. (2004). “Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence”, International Journal of Management Review, Vol. 5/6, nº 3&4, pp. 137-168.
• QUINTÁS CORREDOIRA, M. A.; MARTÍNEZ SENRA, A. I. (2004). “The evaluation of protection inventions methods: the patent rights”, Esic Market, nº 119, September-December, pp. 75-94.
• RAY, G.; BARNEY, J.B.; MUHANNA, W.A. (2004). “Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the Resource-Based View”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, nº 1, pp. 23-37.
• RIGGS, W.; VON HIPPEL, E. (1994). “The Impact of Scientific and Commercial Values on the Sources of Scientific Instrument Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 23, nº 4, pp. 459-469.
• ROSENBERG, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• RUMELT, R. (1984). “Towards a strategic theory of the firm”, en: Lamb, R. (eds.): Competitive Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ, pp. 556-570.
• SHAH, S. (2000): “Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment”.MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper nº 4105.
• SHAW, B. (1985). “The Role of the Interaction between the User and the Manufacturer in Medical Equipment Innovation”, R&D Management, Vol. 15, nº. 4, pp. 283-292.
• TEECE, D.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Managament Journal, vol. 18, nº 7, pp. 509-533.
• TEECE, D.J. (1984). “Economic analysis and strategic management”, California Management Review, Vol. 26, nº 3, pp. 87-110.
• TIETZ, R. et. al. (2004). “The Process of user-innovation: A case study on user innovation in a consumer goods setting”, Technology and Innovation Management, Working Paper nº 29, Hamburg University of Technology, Department for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg, Alemania.
• URBAN, G.L.; VON HIPPEL, E. (1988). “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products”, Management Science, Vol. 34, nº 5, pp. 569-582.
• VEUGELERS, R.; CASSIMAN, B. (1999). “Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 28, nº 1, pp. 63-80.
• VONHIPPEL, E. (1976). “The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process”, Research Policy, Vol. 5, nº 2, pp. 212-239.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (1977). “The Dominant Role of the User in Semiconductor and Electronic Subassembly Process Innovation”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-24, pp. 60-71.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (1986). “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts”, Management Science, Vol. 32, nº 7, pp. 791-805.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (1998). “Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of “sticky” Local Information”, Management Science, Vol. 44, nº 5, pp. 629-644.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (2002). “Open source projects as horizontal innovation networksby and for users”,MIT Sloan School of Management,Working Paper nº 4366-02, June 2002.
• VON HIPPEL, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• VON HIPPEL, E.; KATZ, R. (2002). “Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits”, Management Science, Vol. 48, nº 7, pp. 821-833.
• WERNERFELT, B. (1984). “A resource base view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, nº 2, pp. 171-180.