Crecimiento, desigualdad y pobrezaestado de la cuestión

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahluwalia, M. S. “Inequality, poverty and development”, Journal of Development Economics 3, 4, 1976, pp. 307-342.
• Ahluwalia, M.; N. G. Carter y H. B. Chenery. “Growth and poverty in developing countries”, Journal of Development Economics 6, 3, 1979, pp. 299-341.
• Alesina, A. y R. Perotti. “Income distribution, political instability and investment”, NBER Working Papers 4486, Cambridge, 1994.
• Alesina, A.; S. Ozler et al. “Political instability and economic growth”, Journal of Economic Growth 1, 1996, pp. 189-211.
• Anand, S. y R. Kanbur. “The Kuznets process and the inequality development relationship”, Journal of Development Economics 40, 1993, pp. 25-52.
• Banerjee, A. V. y E. Duflo. “Inequality and growth: What can the data say?”, Journal of Economic Growth 8, 2003, pp. 267-299.
• Becker, G.; K. Murphy y R. Tamura. “Human capital, fertility and growth”, Journal of Political Economy 98, 5, Parte 2, 1990, pp. 12-37.
• Birdsall, N.; R. Sabot y D. Ross. “Inequality and growth reconsidered: Lessons from East Asia”, World Bank Economic Review 9, 1995, pp. 477-508.
• Bourguignon, F. “The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: Explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods”, T. S. Eicher y S. J. Turnovsky, eds., Inequality and growth. Theory and policy implications, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2003, pp. 3-26.
• Bracking, S. “Neoclassical and structural analysis of poverty: Wining the ‘economic kingdom’ for the poor in Southern Africa”, Third World Quarterly 25, 5, 2004, pp. 887-901.
• Bush, R. Poverty and neoliberalism. Persistence and reproduction in the global South, Londres, Pluto Press, 2007.
• CEPAL. Panorama social de América Latina, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile, 2009.
• Chambers, D. “Trading places: Does past growth impact inequality?”, Journal of Development Economics 82, 1, 2007, pp. 257-266.
• Chenery, H.; M. S. Ahluwalia et al. Redistribución con crecimiento. Políticas para mejorar la distribución del ingreso en los países en desarrollo en el contexto del crecimiento económico, Madrid, Tecnos-Banco Mundial, 1976.
• Cling, J. P.; M. Razafindrakoto y F. Roubaud. “New poverty reduction strategies: Old wine in new bottles?”, B. Tungodden, N. Stern e I.
• Kolstad, eds., Toward pro-poor policies: Aid, institutions and globalization, Banco Mundial-Oxford University Press, Washington D. C., 2004, pp. 111-131.
• Cornia, G. Pro-poor macroeconomics: Potential and limitations, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
• Dagdeviren, H.; R. van der Hoeven y J. Weeks. “Redistribution dos matter: Growth and redistribution for poverty reduction”, A. Shorrocks y R. van der Hoeven, eds., Growth, inequality and poverty. Prospects
• for pro-poor economic development, Nueva York, Oxford University Press-UNU-WIDER, 2005, pp. 125-153.
• Deininger, K. y L. Squire. “A new data set measuring income inequality”, World Bank Economic Review 78, 2006, pp. 1138-1154.
• Domínguez, R. “Desigualdad y bloqueo al desarrollo en América Latina”, Principios. Estudios de Economía Política 13, 2009, pp. 5-32.
• Fields, G. S. “Changes in poverty and inequality in developing countries”, World Bank Research Observer 4, 1989, pp. 167-186.
• Fields, G. S. y G. Jakubson. “New evidence on the Kuznets curve”, Cornell University, mimeo, 1994.
• Furtado, C. “Modernización versus desarrollo. Una entrevista con Celso Furtado”, F. Delich, Repensar América Latina, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2004.
• Galor, O. y H. Zang. “Fertility, income distribution and economic growth: Theory and cross country evidence”, Japan and the World Economy 9, 2, 1997, pp. 197-229.
• Galor, O. y J. Zeria. “Income distribution and macroeconomics”, Review of Economic Studies 60, 1993, pp. 35-52.
• Griffin, K., Alternative strategies of economic development, Londres, Macmillan, 1989.
• Gunder Frank, A. Capitalismo y subdesarrollo en América Latina, México D. F., Siglo XXI, 1970.
• Kakwani, N. y E. Pernia. “What is pro-poor growth?”, Asian Development Review 18, 2002, pp. 1-16.
• Kakwani, N.; M. C. Neri y H. Son. “Linkages between pro-poor growth, social programmes and the labour market: The recent Brasilian experience”, working paper 26, Brasilia, International Poverty Center, 2007.
• Kaldor, N. “Alternative theories of distribution”, Review of Economic Studies 23, 1956, pp. 309-334.
• Kanbur, R. “Income distribution and development”, working paper 13, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 1998.
• Kanbur, R. y N. Lustig. “Why is inequality back on the agenda?”,Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 1999.
• Keefer, P. y S. Knack. “Polarization, politics and property rights: The links between inequality and growth”, Public Choice 111, 1-2, 2002, pp. 127-154.
• Klasen, S. “In search of the Holy Grail: How to achieve pro-poor growth?”, B. Tungodden, N. Stern e I. Kolstad, eds., Toward pro-poor policies: Aid, institutions and globalization, Washington D. C., Banco
• Mundial-Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 63-93.
• Kraay, A. “When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries”, Policy Research working paper 3225, Washington D.C, Banco Mundial, 2004.
• Kuznets, S. “Economic growth and income inequality”, American Economic Review 45, 1, 1955, pp. 1-28.
• Lewis, W. A. “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour”, The Manchester School 22, 2, 1954, pp. 139-191.
• Londoño, J. L. y M. Szequely. “Sorpresas distributivas después de una década de reformas: América Latina en los noventa”, Pensamiento Iberoamericano. Revista de Economía Política, núm. especial, 1998, pp. 195-242.
• López, J. H. “Pro-poor growth: a review of what we know (and of what we don’t)”, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 2004.
• Lustig, N.; L. F. López-C. y E. Ortiz-J. “Deconstructing the decline in inequality in Latin America”, Policy Research working paper 6552,Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 2013.
• McKinley, T. The macroeconomic of poverty reduction: Initial findings of the UNDP Asia-Pacific Regional Programme, Nueva York, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, 2003.
• Milanovic, B. “Explaining the increase in inequality during the transition”, working paper 1935, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 1999. Murphy, D.; A. Shleifer y R. W. Vishny. “Income distribution, market size and industrialization”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 3, 1989, pp. 537-564.
• Myrdal, G. Teoría económica y regiones subdesarrolladas, México D.F.,Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1979.
• OCDE. Promoting pro-poor growth: Key policy messages, París, Comité de Ayuda al Desarrollo, 2006a.
• OCDE. Promoting pro-poor growth: Private sector development, París,Comité de Ayuda al Desarrollo, 2006b.
• Oshima, H. T. “Kuznets’ curve and Asian income distribution”, T.Mizoguchi, ed., Making economies more efficient and more equitable:Factors determining income distribution, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 1991.
• Osmani, S. R. “Growth strategies and poverty reduction”, Asia and Pacific Forum on poverty: Reforming policies and institutions for poverty reduction, Manila, Asian Development Bank, 2001.
• Pasha, H. A. “Pro-poor policies”, Fourth Global Forum on citizens,businesses, and governments: Dialogue and partnerships for the promotion of democracy and development, Marrakech, Departamento de Naciones Unidas para Asuntos Sociales y Económicos, 2002.
• Paukert, F. “Income distribution at different levels of development: A survey of evidence”, International Labour Review 108, 1973, pp. 97-125.
• Pérez S., J. P. “El tercer momento rousseauniano de América Latina. Posneoliberalismo y desigualdades sociales”, working paper 72,
• Berlín, Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America, 2014.
• Persson, T. y G. Tabellini. “Is inequality harmful for growth?”, American Economic Review 84, 3, 1994, pp. 600-621.
• Psacharopoulos, G.; S. Morley et al. Poverty and income distribution in Latin America: The story of the 1980s, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 1993.
• Rao, V. “On ‘inequality traps’ and development policy”, Development Outreach, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, febrero de 2006.
• Ravallion, M. “Pro-poor growth: A primer”, Policy Research working paper 3242, Washington D. C., Banco Mundial, 2004.
• Ravallion, M. y S. Chen. “Measuring pro-poor growth”, Economics Letters 78, 2003, pp. 93-99.
• Ray, D. Economía del desarrollo, Barcelona, Antoni Bosch, 2002.
• Ros, J. La teoría del desarrollo y la economía del crecimiento, México D. F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2004.
• Roy, R. y J. Weeks. Thematic summary report: Fiscal policy, Nueva York, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, 2003.
• Saad-Filho., A. “Life beyond the Washington Consensus: An introduction to pro-poor macroeconomics policies”, Review of Political Economy 19, 4, 2007, pp. 513-537.
• Sachs, J. El fin de la pobreza, Barcelona, Debate, 2005.
• Saith, A. “Development and distribution: A critique of the crosscountry U-hypothesis”, Journal of Development Economics 13, 3, 1983,pp. 367-382.
• Salama, P. Le défi des inégalités. Amérique Latine/Asie: une comparaison économique, París, La Découverte, 2006.
• Weeks, J.; V. Q. Huy et al. “On the macroeconomics of poverty reduction. Case study of Vietnam: Seeking equity within growth”, CDPR discussion paper 2112, 2002.
• Whitfield, L. “Pro-poor growth: A review of contemporary debates”, Elites, Production and Poverty Research Program, Copenhague, 2008.