Propuesta de borrador de anteproyecto de ley del deporte

  1. Alberto Palomar Olmeda 1
  2. Ramón Terol Gómez 2
  3. Andreu Camps I Povills 3
  4. Carmen Pérez González 1
  5. Julián Espartero Casado 4
  6. Ana Belén Campuzano Laguillo 5
  7. Remedios Roqueta Buj 6
  8. José Rodríguez García 5
  9. Miguel María García Caba 5
  1. 1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    info
    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ths8210

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  2. 2 Universitat d'Alacant
    info
    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

    Geographic location of the organization Universitat d'Alacant
  3. 3 Universitat de Lleida
    info
    Universitat de Lleida

    Lleida, España

    ROR https://ror.org/050c3cw24

    Geographic location of the organization Universitat de Lleida
  4. 4 Universidad de León
    info
    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de León
  5. 5 Universidad San Pablo
    info
    Universidad San Pablo

    San Luis Potosí, México

    ROR https://ror.org/044evsy53

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad San Pablo
  6. 6 Universitat de València
    info
    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

    Geographic location of the organization Universitat de València
+
Journal:
Revista Aranzadi de derecho de deporte y entretenimiento

ISSN: 2171-5556

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 60

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista Aranzadi de derecho de deporte y entretenimiento

Sustainable development goals

info

SDG classification obtained using Aurora SDG artificial intelligence model.

Abstract

This document corresponds to the work that a group of university professors offered to the Superior Council of Sports in January 2018 and that contains an articulated draft of reform of the current sports regulations. The Project was disinterested, free and the result of the debates in which all of us had participated and had the purpose of contributing to establish a model that would serve to reform the regulatory framework.