Determinants of CSR practicesanalysis of the influence of ownership and the management profile mediating effect

  1. Godos Díez, José Luis
  2. Fernández Gago, Roberto
  3. Cabeza García, Laura
  4. Martínez Campillo, Almudena
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 161

Páginas: 47-68

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2014.890824 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Información de financiación

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación [Research Project ECO2012-35439] and the Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León [Research Project LE004A10-1].

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525. doi:10.2307/256973
  • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678
  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968. doi:10.1177/ 0149206311436079
  • Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263-285. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03) 00067-9
  • Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136-152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00843.x
  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5), 510-527. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765
  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. doi:10.2307/1556363
  • Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Blair, M. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120-136. doi:10.1002/bse.506
  • Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2009). Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 575-596. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00827.x
  • Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333.
  • Caldwell, C., & Karri, R. (2005). Organizational governance and ethical systems: A covenantal approach to building trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1-3), 249-259. doi:10.1007/s10551- 005-1419-2
  • Caldwell, C., Karri, R., & Vollmar, P. (2006). Principal theory and principle theory: Ethical governance from the follower's perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2-3), 207-223. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5586-y
  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863-878. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231
  • Consolandi, C., Nascenzi, P., & Jaiswal-Dale, A. (2008). Ownership concentration and corporate social performance: An empirical evidence for European firms. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference 2008, Belfast.
  • Cuervo, Á. (2004). El gobierno de la empresa. Un problema de conflicto de intereses. In E. Bueno Campos (Ed.), El gobierno de la empresa. En busca de la transparencia y la confianza (pp. 115-138). Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233-252. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8683.2011.00907.x
  • Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118: 117-126. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1574-1
  • David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 91-100. doi:10.1002/ smj.571
  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-48.
  • Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93: 1155-1177. doi:10.1086/261354
  • De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663. doi:10.1177/ 0149206311411506
  • Dierendonck, D. V. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37, 1228-1261. doi:10.1177/0149206310380462
  • Dikolli, S. S., Kulp, S. L., & Sedatole, K. L. (2009). Transient institutional ownership and CEO contracting. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 737-770. doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.737
  • Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR. The problem with assuming that companies can do well while also doing good is that markets don't really work that way. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(3), 23-29.
  • Fernández Sánchez, J. L., Sotorrío, L., & Díez, E. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: A structural equation model analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 91-101. doi:10.1002/csr.244
  • Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. (1996). Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 715-730. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00169.x
  • Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258. doi:10.2307/256324
  • Fray, A. M. (2007). Ethical behavior and social responsibility in organizations: Process and evaluation. Management Decision, 45(1), 76-88. doi:10.1108/00251740710718971
  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp. 122-126.
  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2012). CEO qualities and codes of ethics. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 295-312.
  • Ghazali, N. A. M. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 7(3), 251-266. doi:10.1108/14720700710756535
  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
  • Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10-22. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003
  • Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445. doi:10.1002/smj.750
  • Godos-Díez, J. L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Cabeza-García, L. (2012). Propiedad y control en la puesta en práctica de la RSC. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(1), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.cede.2011.06.002
  • Godos-Díez, J. L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2011). How important are CEOs to CSR Practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 531-548. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0609-8
  • Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2010). The social responsibility of major shareholders. En G. Aras & D. Crowther (Eds.), A handbook of corporate governance and social responsibility (pp. 287-306). Farnham, Reino Unido: Gower Publishing.
  • Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034-1046. doi:10.2307/256611
  • Grosfeld, I., & Hashi, I. (2007). Changes in ownership concentration in mass privatised firms: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 520-534. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00585.x
  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691-719. doi:10.1086/261404
  • Guerras, L. Á. (2004). Problemas organizativos en el proceso de la dirección estratégica. Universia Business Review, Primer Trimestre(1), 116-126.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5a ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 369-406). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45-67. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360
  • Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172-193. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0363
  • Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599
  • Hoopes, D. G., & Miller, D. (2006). Ownership preferences, competitive heterogeneity, and familycontrolled businesses. Family Business Review, 19(2), 89-101. doi:10.1111/j.1741- 6248.2006.00064.x
  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x
  • Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256. doi:10.2307/3857812
  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi:10.1016/0304- 405X(76)90026-X
  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351-383. doi:10.1007/s10551-011- 0869-y
  • Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576. doi:10.2307/256977
  • Johnson, S., La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22-27. doi:10.1257/aer.90.2.22
  • Judge, W. Q., Gaur, A., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2010). Antecedents of shareholder activism in target firms: Evidence from a multi-country study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 258-273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00797.x
  • Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: PWS-KENT Publishing Company.
  • La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3-27.
  • Le-Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22, 704-721. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0541
  • Lee, P., & O'Neill, H. (2003). Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212-225. doi:10.2307/30040615
  • Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(S2), 303-323. doi:10.1007/ s10551-008-9738-8
  • López-Iturriaga, F., & López-de-Foronda, O. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and reference shareholders: An analysis of European multinational firms. Transnational Corporations Review, 3(3), 1-11.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
  • Malhotra, N. K. (1981). A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts and product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), 456-464. doi:10.2307/3151339
  • Manville, B., & Ober, J. (2003). A company of citizens: What the world's first democracy teaches leaders about creating great organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Working Paper.
  • Martínez-Campillo, A., & Fernández-Gago, R. (2011). Diversification strategy, CEO management style and firm performance: An application of Heckman's two-stage method. Quality and Quantity, 45(1), 59-73. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9290-3
  • Martynov, A. (2009). Agents or stewards? Linking managerial behavior and moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 239-249. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0039-7
  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  • Monks, R., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Mudrack, P. (2007). Individual personality factors that affect normative beliefs about the rightness of corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 46(1), 33-62. doi:10.1177/ 0007650306290312
  • Ndemanga, D. A., & Koffi, E. T. 2009. Ownership structure, industry sector and corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices: The case of Swedish listed companies. University Essay de la University of Gothenburg's School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 283-297. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z
  • Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483-515. doi:10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01190.x
  • Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(2), 4-16. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1992.tb00485.x
  • Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Garcia-Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 94-107. doi:10.1002/csr.189
  • Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2008). Social responsibility in Spain: Practices and motivations in firms. Management Decision, 46(8), 1247-1271. doi:10.1108/00251740810901417
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  • Quazi, A. M. (2003). Identifying the determinants of corporate managers' perceived social obligations. Management Decision, 41(9), 822-831. doi:10.1108/00251740310488999
  • Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9
  • Rupp, D., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543. doi:10.1002/job.380
  • Scherer, A., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors, toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505-532. doi:10.5840/beq200616446
  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159-180. doi:10.1002/smj.439
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. doi:10.1037/1082- 989X.7.4.422
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Thomas, A., & Simerly, R. L. (1994). The chief executive officer and corporate social performance: An interdisciplinary examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(12), 959-968. doi:10.1007/ BF00881665
  • Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407-424. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x
  • Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704) 18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885-913. doi:10.1002/ smj.1952
  • Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960-976. doi:10.5465/ AMJ.2006.22798177
  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552. doi:10.2307/256975
  • Zhao, X., Lynch, Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. doi:10.1086/651257