Descubrimiento de información científica¿todavía misión y visión de la biblioteca académica?

  1. Blanca Rodríguez Bravo 1
  2. Maria da Graça Simões 2
  3. María Cristina Vieira de Freitas 2
  4. José Antonio Frías 3
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Universidade de Coimbra
    info

    Universidade de Coimbra

    Coímbra, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/04z8k9a98

  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710 1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Información pública

Volumen: 26

Número: 3

Páginas: 464-479

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2017.MAY.13 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

El acceso a contenidos de calidad es clave para la investigación y uno de los valores principales que los académicos asignan a la biblioteca. Los datos bibliográficos desempeñan un papel trascendental en las bibliotecas universitarias, que dedican abundantes recursos a su obtención y disposición para el acceso. El estudio indaga sobre dónde y cómo se descubre la información bibliográfica, y pone de manifiesto el papel de los motores de búsqueda, bases de datos, repositorios y servicios de descubrimiento en ese proceso. El esfuerzo que las bibliotecas han realizado implementando estos servicios parece haber dado sus frutos en relación al incremento en el uso de las colecciones. Sin embargo, Google parece conservar la prioridad como opción de descubrimiento de información científica. Se trata de un estudio de revisión, basado en el análisis de investigaciones originales, así como de resultados difundidos en informes recientes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2012). “2012 top ten trends in academic libraries. A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education”. College & research libraries news, v. 73, n. 6, pp. 311-320. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/all/2012-toptrends-academic-libraries.html
  • Akeroyd, John (2017). “Discovery systems: are they now the library?”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, January, pp. 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1085
  • Anglada, Lluís (2012). “Bibliotecas universitarias: cabalgando la tecnología, siguiendo al usuario”. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 6, pp. 553-556. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.nov.01
  • Anglada, Lluís (2014). “Are libraries sustainable in a world of free, networked, digital information?”. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 6, pp. 603-611. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.nov.07
  • Asher, Andrew D.; Duke, Lynda M.; Wilson, Suzanne (2013). “Paths of discovery: Comparing the search effectiveness of Ebsco Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and conventional library resources”. College & research libraries, v. 74, n. 5, pp. 464-488. http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16327
  • Ávila-García, Lorena (2013). Herramientas de descubrimiento en bibliotecas universitarias. Ortiz-Repiso, Virginia y Rodríguez-Mateos, David (dirs.). Trabajo fin de master, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. http://repositorio.ual.es:8080/jspui/bitstream/10835/2569/1/ TFM_Lorena_Avila.pdf
  • Ávila-García, Lorena; Ortiz-Repiso, Virginia; Rodríguez-Mateos, David (2015). “Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única?”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 38, n. 1, e077. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.1.1178
  • Aznar-Lafont, David (2014). “Las herramientas de descubrimiento: los nuevos sistemas de búsqueda global en las bibliotecas académicas”. En: Baraibar, Álvaro (ed.). Visibilidad y divulgación de la investigación desde las humanidades digitales. Experiencias y proyectos. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, pp. 253-262. ISBN: 978 84 8081 412 6. http://hdl.handle.net/10171/35724
  • Baldwin, Dee; Kucsak, Michael; Eng, Alice (2012). “Don’t touch that string! There went the databases”. Information outlook, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 24-32. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/library_facpub/7
  • Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís (2016). “Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries”. New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp.173-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
  • Breeding, Marshall (2011). “Discovering Harry pottery barn”. Computers in libraries, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 21-23. https://goo.gl/Ly3Bhm
  • Breeding, Marshall (2014). “Web-scale discovery services”. American libraries, v. 45, n. 1/2, pp. 25-25. http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2014/01/14/webscale-discovery-services
  • Breeding, Marshall (2015a). The future of library resource discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee. Baltimore: NISO. ISBN: 978 1 937522 41 4 http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download. php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf
  • Breeding, Marshall (2015b). “Informe sobre sistemas bibliotecarios. Hacer operativa la innovación”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 485-496. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.16
  • Breitbach, William (2016). “Web-scale discovery: Utopian dream or dystopian nightmare (or maybe something in between)?”. En: California academic & research libraries 2016 conf. http://conf2016.carl-acrl.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ Breitbach-Web-scale-discovery-FINAL.pdf
  • Chapman, Suzanne; Dennis, Scott; Folger, Kathleen; Varnum, Ken (2012). “Developing a user-centered article discovery environment”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 194-224. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Chickering, F. William; Yang, Sharon Q. (2014). “Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update”. Information technology and libraries, June, pp. 5-30. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471
  • Conrad, Lettie Y. (2017a). “Headlines from the discovery files: Key publications on scholarly content discoverability”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1080
  • Conrad, Lettie Y. (2017b). “Pathways to a new way of working. Discoverability”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1088
  • Dempsey, Lorcan (2012). “Thirteen ways of looking at libraries, discovery, and the catalog: scale, workflow, attention”. Educause review, December 10th. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/12/thirteen-waysof-looking-at-libraries-discovery-and-the-catalog-scaleworkflow-attention
  • Dempsey, Lorcan (2013). “Discovery vs discoverability…” . En: On libraries, services and networks, January. http://orweblog.oclc.org/discovery-vs-discoverability
  • Djenno, Mireille; Insua, Glenda; Gregory, Gwen M.; Brantley, John-Steve (2014). “Discovering usability: Comparing two discovery systems at one academic library”. Journal of web librarianship, v. 8, pp. 263-285. https://works.bepress.com/steve_brantley/23 https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.933690
  • Else, Holly (2016). “Libraries becoming invisible to junior scholars”. THE, December, 8. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/librariesbecoming-invisible-junior-scholars
  • Fagan, Jody-Condit; Mandernach, Meris A.; Nelson, Carl S.; Paulo, Jonathan R.; Saunders, Grover (2012). “Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library”. Information technology and libraries, v. 31, n. 1, March, pp. 83-112. http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/ view/1855/1745 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1855
  • Faherty, Anna (2016). Academic book discovery, evaluation and access: Insights and opportunities for enhancing the scholarly experience. https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/ faherty_academic-book-discovery-full-report.pdf
  • Faiks, Angi; Oberg, Johan; Gabrio, Katy (2012). “WorldCat Local: A transformative solution”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 608-621. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Freund, Leilani; Poehlmann, Christian; Seale, Colleen (2012). “From metasearching to discovery: The University of Florida experience”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 22-43. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Gardner, Tracy; Inger, Simon (2016). How readers discover content in scholarly publications. Fernhill: Renew Training. https://goo.gl/icugHc
  • Hofmann, Melissa A.; Yang, Sharon Q. (2012). “Discovering what’s changed: a revisit of the opacs of 260 academic libraries”. Library hi tech, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239942
  • Inger, Simon; Gardner, Tracy (2013). “Library technology in content discovery –evidence from a large-scale reader survey”. Insights, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 120-127. http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.75
  • Kaufmann, Karen; Larsen, Jeanne; De-Salvo, Patricia (2012). “Discovering the discovery tool: The introduction and impact on research and instruction at Seminole State College of Florida”. College & undergraduate libraries, v. 19, n. 2-4, pp. 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693432
  • Kemp, Jan (2012). “Does web-scale discovery make a difference? Changes in collections use after implementing Summon”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 456-468. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Kennedy, Sean P. (2014). “Uncovering discovery layer services”. Public services quarterly, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.875788
  • Lam, Mun-Yee Shirley; Sum, Ming-Ko (2013). “Enhancing access and usage. The OUHK’s experience in resource discovery service”. En: IFLA World library and information congress, 17-23 August 2013.
  • Levine-Clark, Michael; McDonald, John; Price, Jason (2014).“The effect of discovery systems on online journal usage: a longitudinal study”. Insights, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 249-256. http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.153
  • Levine-Clark, Michael; Price, Jason; McDonald, John (2013). “Discovery or displacement? A large-scale longitudinal study of the effect of discovery systems on online journal usage”. En: Procs of the Charleston library conf. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315331
  • Long Matthew P.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2014). Ithaka S+R US. Library survey 2013. New York: Ithaka S+R. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/ithaka-srus-library-survey-2013
  • Mussell, Jessica; Croft, Rosie (2013). “Discovery layers and the distance student: Online search habits of students”. Journal of library & information services in distance learning, v. 7, n. 1-2, pp. 18-39.
  • National Information Standards Organization (NISO) (2015). ODI Conformance checklists & statements. http://www.niso.org/workrooms/odi/conformance
  • Nicholas, David (2008). “If we do not understand our users, we will certainly fail”. En: The e-resources management handbook 1. United Kingdom Serials Group. http://uksg.metapress.com/content/e2qjfqymrrmg3rqd/ fulltext.pdf
  • Nicholas, David (dir.) (2016). Early career researchers: the Harbingers of change? Final report from Ciber, Year one (2016). https://goo.gl/tA89al
  • Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, A.; Herman, Eti; Swigon, Marzena (2017). “Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 1, January, p. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.108
  • Nicholas, David; Clark, David; Herman, Eti (2016). “ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered”. Learned publishing, v. 29, n. 3, June. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1035
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R. (2015). Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/ JRC94955/jrc94955.pdf
  • Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid; RodríguezBravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Dobrowolki, Tom; Pouchot, Stephany (2015). “New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, July, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303
  • Niyazov, Yuri; Vogel, Carl; Price, Richard; Lund, Ben; Judd, David; Akil, Adnan; Schwartzman, Josh; Shron, Max (2016) “Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu”. PLoS one, v. 11, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148257
  • O’Hara, Lisa (2012). “Collection usage pre-and post-Summon implementation at the University of Manitoba libraries”. Evidence based library and information practice, v. 7, n. 4, pp. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8DK70
  • OCLC (2009). Online catalogs: What users and librarians want. Dublin: Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center. https://lccn.loc.gov/2011280465
  • Ollé, Candela; Borrego, Ángel (2010), “A qualitative study of the impact of electronic journals on scholarly information behavior”, Library & information science research, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.02.002
  • Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto, DelgadoLópez-Cozar, Emilio (2016). “ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas”. El profesional de la información, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 303310. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.mar.18
  • Perruso, Carol (2016). “Undergraduates’ use of Google vs. library resources: A four-year cohort study”. College & research libraries, v. 77, n. 5, pp. 614-630. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.614
  • Pinto, María; Fernández-Marcial, Viviana; Gómez-Camarero, Carmen (2010), “The impact of information behaviour in academic library service quality: A case study of the science and technology area in Spain”. The journal of academic librarianship, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.11.008
  • Pintos-Ureta, Paula (2016). El etiquetado social y el contenido generado por los usuarios en las bibliotecas universitarias españolas que usan servicios de descubrimiento. Trabajo de fin de grado. Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo (dir.). León: Universidad de León.
  • Pontis, Sheila; Blandford, Ann; Greifeneder, Eiker; Attalla, Hesham; Neal, David (2015). “Keeping up to date: An academic researcher’s information journey”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 1, p. 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23623
  • Priestner, Andy; Marshall, David (2016). Snapshot: a cultural probe study exploring the research and information behavior of postdocs and PhD students at the University of Cambridge. https://futurelib.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/the-snapshotproject.pdf
  • Race, Tammera M. (2012). “Resource discovery tools: Supporting serendipity”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 139-152. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Research Information Network (2009). Creating catalogues: Bibliographic records in a networked world. A RIN report. https://goo.gl/d17zJY
  • Research Information Network (2011). The value of libraries for research and researchers: A RIN and Rlink report. https://goo.gl/SZAbfk
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa (2011). “An analysis of the use of electronic journals in a Spanish academic context: Developments and profitability”. Serials review, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 181-195. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00987913.2 011.10765381
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Alvite-Díez, María-Luisa; Olea, Isabel (2015). “La utilización de las revistas electrónicas en la Universidad de León (España): hábitos de consumo y satisfacción de los investigadores”. Investigación bibliotecológica, v. 29, n. 66, pp. 17-55. http://ref.scielo.org/dgpr5s
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Borges, Maria-Manuel; Fernandes, Alberto-Nuno-Oliveira; Olea-Merino, Isabel; De-Oliveira, Maria-João Carvalho (2013). “Hábitos de consumo y satisfacción con las revistas electrónicas de los investigadores de las universidades de Coimbra, León y Porto”. En: Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Fernanda Ribeiro, coords. 6º Encontro ibérico Edicic 2013: Globalização, Ciencia e Informação. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto: Cetac. Media, pp. 1189-1208. http://eprints.rclis.org/23189
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Simões, Maria-da-Graça; DeFreitas, Maria-Cristina-Vieira; Frías, José-Antonio (2015). “La búsqueda de información en herramientas de descubrimiento y opac’s: fortalezas y debilidades”. En: XII Congreso
  • ISKO España y II Congreso ISKO España-Portugal. Organización del conocimiento para sistemas de información abiertos. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia. https://goo.gl/3s7izq
  • Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Travieso-Rodríguez, Críspulo; Simões, Maria-da-Graça; De-Freitas, Maria-Cristina-Vieira (2014). “Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries”. En: Wieslaw Babik (ed.) (2014). Knowledge organization in the 21st century: Between historical patterns and future prospects. Procs of the 13th Intl ISKO conf., 19-22 May 2014Kraków, Poland. Würzburg: ErgonVerlag, pp. 516-523. http://hdl.handle.net/10174/11782
  • Rodríguez-Yunta, Luis (2015). “Servicios de descubrimiento basados en un índice centralizado: su expansión en las bibliotecas académicas españolas y futuras líneas de investigación”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 9, pp. 49-55. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2015.09
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2014). Does discovery still happen in the library? Roles and strategies for a shifting reality. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.24914
  • Schonfeld, Roger C. (2015). Meeting researchers where they start: Streamlining access to scholarly resources. Ithaka S+R. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ SR_Issue_Brief_Meeting_Researchers_Where_They_ Start_032615.pdf
  • Soules, Aline; Golomb, Liorah; Kelly, James R.; Chen, Barbara (2014). “Navigating the MLA bibliography-redux: Performance across vendor platforms and discovery tools”. Journal of library administration, v. 54, n. 2, pp. 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.903367
  • Spezi, Valérie (2016). “Is information-seeking behavior of doctoral students changing?: A review of the literature (2010-2015)”. New review of academic librarianship, v. 22, n. 1, p. 78-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831
  • Spezi, Valérie; Creaser, Claire; Conyers, Angela (2015). “The impact of resource discovery services (RDS) on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: Selected results from a UKSG-funded project”. Serials review, v. 41, n. 2, pp. 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1035991
  • Tay, Aaron (2016a). “Aggregating institutional repositories: A rethink”. Musings about librarianship. https://goo.gl/FX9L4O
  • Tay, Aaron (2016b). “Library discovery and the open access challenge Take 2”. Mussings about librarianship. https://goo.gl/3S28K1
  • Tennant, Roy (2009). “21st century description and access”. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, n. 22. http://bid.ub.edu/22/tennant2.htm https://doi.org/10.1344/105.000001454
  • Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Christian, Lisa; Volentine, Rachel (2015). “Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: A continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150203
  • Thoburn, June; Coates, Annette; Stone, Graham (2012). “Simplifying resource discovery and access in academic libraries: Implementing and evaluating Summon at Huddersfield and Northumbria Universities”. En: Mary-Pagliero Popp; Diane Dallis (eds.). Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 580-597. ISBN: 978 1 4666 1821 3
  • Vaughan, Jason (2012). “Investigations into library webscale discovery services”. Information technology and libraries, v. 31, n. 1, pp. 32-82. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1916
  • Warren, John W. (2015). “Zen and the art of metadata maintenance”. Journal of electronic publishing, v. 18, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.305
  • Warwick, Clare; Rimmer, Jon; Blandford, Ann; Gow, Jeremy; Buchanan, George (2009). “Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 69, n. 12, pp. 2402-2415. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21179
  • Way, Doug (2010).“The impact of Web-scale discovery on the use of a library collection”. Serials review, v. 36, n. 4, December, pp. 214-220. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/library_sp/9
  • Wolff, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York: Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.277685
  • Wolff, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016b). UK survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R/Jisc/RLUK. New York: Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10. 18665/sr.282736
  • Zhu, Julie; Kelley, Jalyn (2015). “Collaborating to reduce content gaps in discovery: What publishers, discovery service providers, and libraries can do to close the gaps”. Science & technology libraries, v. 34, n. 4, p. 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1102677