Evaluación del módulo de cuestionarios del entorno de trabajo UBUVirtual mediante el modelo de aceptación tecnológica

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abella, V., López, C., Ortega, N., Sánchez, P., & Lezcano, F. (2011). Implantación de UBUVirtual en la Universidad de Burgos: evaluación y expectativas de uso. EDUTEC: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 38. Recuperado de: http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec38/implantacion-ubuvirtual-universidad- burgos.html
• Adams, D. A., and Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Arteaga-Sánchez, R., Duarte-Hueros, A. & García-Ordaz, M. (2013). E-learning and University of Huelva: a study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 135-160. doi:10.1108/10650741311306318
• Blanco, M., & Ginovart, M. (2012). Los cuestionarios del entorno Moodle: su contribución a la evaluación virtual formativa de los alumnos de matemáticas de primer año de las titulaciones de Ingeniería. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 9(1), 166-183. Recuperado de: http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/ view/v9n1-blanco-ginovart/v9n1-blanco-ginovart
• Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in Higher Education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37 (1). Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5wm1465
• Bruner, G. C. & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553-558. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.002 (Pubitemid 40083477)
• Chow, M., Herold, D.K., Choo, T.-M. and Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136-1144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011
• Cuesta, I.I., & Alegre J.M. (2012). Uso de la plataforma Moodle como herramienta para la evaluación continua de estudiantes en el espacio europeo de educación superior. Revista de Comunicación Vivat Academia, 117E, Recuperado de: http://www.ucm.es/info/vivataca/numeros/n117E/ DATOSS.htm
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
• Davis, F. D., and Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
• Davis, S. y Wiedenbeck, S. (2001). The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers, 13(5), 549-580. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00034-0 (Pubitemid 32509336)
• De Pablos, C., López, D., & Santos, R. (2010). The implementation of free software in firms: an empirical analysis. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10(16), 113-130. doi:10.4192/1577-8517-v10-5
• Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085-1093. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.012
• Ferrao, M. (2010). E-assessment within the Bologna paradigm: evidence from Portugal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 819-830. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.011
• Gutiérrez, E., and Trenas., M. A., Ramos, J., Corbera, F., & Romero, S. (2010). A new Moodle module supporting automatic verification of VHDL-based assignments. Computers & Education, 54(2), 562-577. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.006
• Hendrickson, A. R., and Massey., P. D., & Cronan, T. P. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 227-230.
• Lee, Y. C. (2008). The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1423-1438. doi:10.1016/j.compedu. 2007.01.001 (Pubitemid 351483952)
• Liu, I.F., Chen, M.C., Sun, Y.S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online. Learning Community Computers and Education, 54(2), 600-610. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
• Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250-267. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 (Pubitemid 44573577)
• Padilla-Meléndez, A., Garrido-Moreno, A. & Del Aguila-Obra, A. R. (2008). Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 609-623. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007. 06.013 (Pubitemid 351697620)
• Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W. and Cha, S.-B. (2012), University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
• van Raij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 (Pubitemid 351174014)
• Saade', R.G., Morin, D., & Thomas, J.D.E. (2012). Critical thinking in e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1608-1617. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.025
• Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence de acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632-1640. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011
• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453-472.
• Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517-525.
• Smoline, D.V. (2008). Some problems of computer-aided testing and "interview-like test". Computers & Education, 51(2), 743-756. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.008 (Pubitemid 351697626)
• Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25(5-6), 863-873. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01873.x
• Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluation and choice: predictive evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 319-324.
• Varol, E.S., Tarcan, E., & Ozmen, I. (2010). The acceptance and use of e-learning systems in Turkey. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 8 (1), 90-105. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2010.03401
• Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favourable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quartely, 27(3), 239-260
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 (Pubitemid 33224535)
• Yoo, S.J., Han, S.H., Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: a case from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 942-950. doi:10.1016/j.chb. 2011.12.015
• Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K.K., & Wang, Z. (2012). Promoting the intention of students to continue their participation in e-learning systems: the role of the communication environment. Information Technology and People, 25 (4), 356-375. doi:10.1108/09593841211278776