Retos y oportunidades en organización del conocimiento en la intersección con las tecnologías de la información

  1. Daniel Martínez-Ávila 1
  2. Rosa San Segundo 2
  3. Francisco A. Zurian 3
  1. 1 São Paulo State University – UNESP, Brazil
  2. 2 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, España
  3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 37

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2014.3.1112 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de documentación científica

Resumen

En este trabajo se estudia la intersección de la Organización del Conocimiento y las Tecnologías de la Información, haciendo especial incidencia en los retos y oportunidades que existen en este área para los expertos en Organización del Conocimiento, tanto a un nivel teórico como práctico. Primero se revisan algunos conceptos necesarios para la contextualización del trabajo. Después se analiza la historia de la Web, comenzando con Internet, y continuando con la World Wide Web, la Web Semántica, los problemas en Inteligencia Artificial, la Web 2.0, y Linked Data. Finalmente, se concluye el estudio con algunas aplicaciones de las tecnologías de la información para la Organización del Conocimiento en el campo bibliotecario, como FRBR, BIBFRAME e iniciativas de OCLC, así como algunos retos y oportunidades en los que la investigación y los expertos en Organización del Conocimiento podrían jugar un rol clave en relación con la Web Semántica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, p. 274.
  • Agarwal, P. R. (2012). Semantic Web in Comparison to Web 2.0. Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (ISMS), pp. 558-563. Ahmedabad, India: Jyoti Microsyst. Pvt. Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2012.49
  • Baeza-Yates, R.; Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2011). Modern information retrieval: the concepts and technology behind search. (2a ed.). New York: ACM, p. 913.
  • Berners-Lee, T. (1998a.) Semantic Web Road map. Disponible http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Berners-Lee, T. (1998b). Web design issues; What a semantic can represent. Disponible http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. New York: Harper-Collins, p. 256.
  • Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked Data. Disponible http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Berners-Lee, T; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May, 1-4.
  • Bologna, J.; Walsh, A. M. (1997). The Accountant's Handbook of Information Technology. New York; John Wiley and Sons, p. 384.
  • Bostrom, N. (2006). AI Set to Exceed Human Brain Power. CNN August 9. Disponible http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/07/24/ai.bostrom/ [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Budd, J. (2006). Discourse Analysis and the Study of Communication in LIS. Library Trends, vol. 55 (1), 65-82. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0046
  • Budd, J.; Raber, D. (1996). Discourse Analysis: Method and Application in the Study of Information. Information Processing & Management, vol. 32, 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(96)85007-2
  • Clocksin, W. (2003). Artificial Intelligence and the Future. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 361 (1809), 1721-1748. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York: BasicBooks, p. 400.
  • Dahlberg, I. (2006) Knowledge organization: a new science?. Knowledge Organization, vol. 33 (1), 11-19.
  • Doctorow, C. (2001). Metacrap: Putting the Torch to Seven Straw-Men of the Meta-Utopia. The Well. Disponible http://www.well.com/~doctorowmetacrap.htm [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Durville, P.; Gandon, F. (2009). Filling the gap between Web 2.0 technologies and natural language processing pipelines with semantic web. SEMAPRO '09. Third International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing, 2009, pp. 109-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.23 [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SEMAPRO.2009.23
  • El-Goarany, K.; Saleh, I.; Kulczycki, G. (2008). The Social Service Network - Web 2.0 Can Make Semantic Web Services Happen. 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services. pp. 419-423.
  • Frohmann, B. (1994). Discourse Analysis as a Research Method in Library and Information Science. Library and Information Science Research, vol. 16, 119-138. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0740-8188(94)90004-3
  • Frohmann, B. (2001). Discourse and Documentation: Some Implications for Pedagogy and Research. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, vol. 42, 13-26. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40324034
  • García Marco, F. J. (2009). Perspectivas sobre el uso de la Web Semántica en el tratamiento de información y documentación legislativa. Scire, vol. 15 (1), 59-85.
  • Greaves, M.; Mika, P. (2008). Semantic Web and Web 2.0. Journal of Web Semantics, vol. 6 (1), 1-3. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.12.002
  • Greenberg, J.; Losee, R.; Pérez Agüera, J. R.; Scherle, R.; White, H.; Willis, C. (2011). HIVE: Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 37 (4). Disponible http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-11/AprMay11_Greenberg_etAl.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Gruber, T. (2007). Collective Knowledge Systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 6 (1), 4-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.011
  • Himanen, P. (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. New York: Random House Trade, p. 232.
  • Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, vol. 58 (4), 422-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136
  • Hjørland, B. (2003). Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, vol. 30 (2), 87-111.
  • Hjørland, B. (2006). Laymen as Knowledge Organizers. Lifeboat for Knowledge Organization. Disponible http://www.iva.dk/bh/lifeboat_ko/CONCEPTS/laymen_as_knowledge_organizers.htm [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Hjørland, B. (2008). What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, vol. 35 (2/3), 86-101.
  • Hjørland, B. (2011). The importance of theories of knowledge: indexing and information retrieval as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62 (1), 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21451
  • Hjørland, B. (2012). Knowledge Organization = Information Organization? Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012 Mysore, India, pp. 206-211. Würzburg, Germany: Ergon.
  • Hjørland, B.; Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Do main-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46 (6), 400-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y
  • Hoffman, R. R. (1992). The Psychology of Expertise: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI. New York: Springer Press, p. 408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9733-5
  • Hope, G.; Wang, T. (G.); Barkataki, S. (2007). Convergence of Web 2.0 and Semantic Web: A Semantic Tagging and Searching System for Creating and Searching Blogs. International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2007. ICSC 2007, pp. 201-208.
  • Howard, A. (2013). Linking open data to augmented intelligence and the economy. O'Reilly Radar April 30. Disponible http://radar.oreilly.com/2013/04linking-open-data-to-augmented-intelligence-and-the-economy.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (2009). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Disponible http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Jeschke, S.; Wilke, M.; Natho, N.; Pfeiffer, O. (2008). KEA - a Mathematical Knowledge Management System combining Web 2.0 with Semantic Web Technologies. 4th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, 2007. IIT '07, pp. 138-142.
  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking, p. 672.
  • Laningham, S. (2006). developerWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee. Disponible http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwicm-int082206txt.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Leiner, B. M.; Cerf, V. G.; Clark, D. D.; Kahn, R. E.; Kleinrock, L.; Lynch, D. C.; Postel, J.; Roberts, L. G.; Wolff, S. (2000). The History of the Internet. Internet Society. Reimpreso en Leiner, B. M.; Cerf, V. G.; Clark, D. D.; Kahn, R. E.; Kleinrock, L.; Lynch, D. C.; Postel, J.; Roberts, L. G.; Wolff, S. (2009). The History of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review vol. 39 (5), 22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1629607.1629613
  • Lemen, C. (2010). The New Knowledge Processing: Integrating Semantic Web with Web 2.0. 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010), pp. 314-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCASM.2010.5620527
  • López-Huertas, M. J. (2008). Some current research questions in the field of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, vol. 35, 113-136.
  • Markoff, J. (2005). Behind Artificial Intelligence, a Squadron of Bright Real People. The New York Times October 14. Disponible http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/14/technology/14artificial.html?_r=0 [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Martínez-Ávila, D. (2012a). Problems and Characteristics of Foucauldian Discourse Analysis as a Research Method. En Smiraglia, R. P.; Lee, H-L. (editores) Cultural Frames of Knowledge. Ergon, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Martínez-Ávila, D. (2012b). DDC-BISAC switching a new case of reader-interest classification. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
  • Martínez-Ávila, D.; Smiraglia R. P. (2013). Revealing Perception: Discourse Analysis in a Phenomenological Framework. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 4. Milwaukee, Estados Unidos: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Disponible http://www.iskocus.org/NASKO2013proceedings/MartinezAvila_Smiraglia_Revealing_Perception.pdf [Consulta 10 de febrero de 2014]
  • Mas, A. (2005). Agentes software y sistemas multiagente: conceptos, arquitecturas y aplicaciones. Madrid: Prentice Hall, p. 286.
  • McCarthy, J. (2007). What is Artificial Intelligence? Disponible http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/whatisai.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • McCarthy, J.; Minsky, M. L.; Rochester, N.; Shannon, C. E. (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Disponible http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • McCorduck, P. (2004). Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. (2.ª ed.) Natick, MA: A. K. Peters, p. 576.
  • Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.; Mueller, V.; MacDougall, K. (2012). Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Disponible http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Noy, N. F.; McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology'. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, March 2001. Disponible http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.doc [Consulta 10 de febrero de 2014].
  • O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Disponible http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Palma Méndez, J. T.; Marín Morales, R. (2008). Inteligencia artificial: métodos, técnicas y aplicaciones. Madrid: MacGraw-Hill, p. 1022.
  • Raymond, E. S. (2001). The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary Revised and Expanded. Cambridge, Mass.: O'Reilly, p. 241.
  • Roberts, L. (1967). Multiple Computer Networks and Intercomputer Communication. Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, Gatlinburg, Tenn. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/800001.811680 [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/800001.811680
  • Rowley, J.; Hartley, R. (2008). Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information. (4.ª ed.). Hampshire: Ashgate, p. 367.
  • Russell, S. J.; Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. (3.ª ed.) Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, p. 1152.
  • San Segundo, R. (2002). A new concept of knowledge. Online Information Review, vol 26 (4), 239-245. [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520210438688
  • San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D. (2012). New Conceptual Structures for the Digital Environment: From KOS to the Semantic Interconnection. En: Neelameghan, A.; Raghavan, K. S. (editores). Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012 Mysore, India. Würzburg, Germany: Ergon.
  • Schreiber, G. (2011). Issues in Publishing and Aligning Web Vocabularies. Presentado en Classification and Ontology: Formal Approaches and Access to Knowledge: UDC Seminar, 19-20 September, The Hague, The Netherlands. Disponible http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/talks/11-udc.pdf [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013].
  • Smiraglia, R. (2012). Knowledge Organization: Some Trends in an Emergent Domain. El Profesional de la Información, vol. 21, 225-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.may.01 [Consulta 19 de junio de 2013]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.may.01
  • Sowa, J. F. (1999). Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co., p. 594.
  • Taylor, A. G.; Joudrey, D. N. (2009). The Organization of Information. (3ª ed.) Westporet, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited, p. 512.
  • Tennis, J. T. (2003). Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization. vol. 30 (3/4), 191-195.
  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer Power and Human Reason. London: Penguin, p. 300.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet